Parliamentary committees
Changing perspectives on changing institutions
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6292017 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lawrence D Longley (Lawrence University), Roger H Davidson, Roger Davidson (University of Maryland, College Park) |
| Año | 1998 |
| Volumen | 4 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 1-20 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1998-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Legislative Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1357-2334 • E-ISSN: 1743-9337 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13572339808420537 |
| OpenAlex | W2001491456 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 23 |
| Referencias citadas | 9 |
Parliaments, which according to the then prevalent scholarly literature were expected to decline in significance in the decades of the 1960s and 1970s, actually have developed new and vital political roles and, in recent decades, have innovated in their institutional structure – most recurrently in their newly organised or invigorated parliamentary committees. This is in striking contrast to the seeming antipathy between a vigorous committee system and traditional parliamentary government. There has been a growth of the centrality of committees, not only in a few parliaments, but as a global phenomenon. Even as newly democratic parliaments throughout the world experiment with more elaborate committee structures, those with older, highly developed committee systems are reaching for more varied and flexible alternatives. In short, parliamentary committees have emerged as vibrant and central institutions of democratic parliaments of today's world and have begun to define new and changing roles for themselves. This publication in its entirety is devoted to the study and evaluation of these important and still emergent parliamentary developments ‐ to an understanding of the new roles of parliamentary committees in the quest for effective parliamentary influence in and contribution to democratic government
Antipathy · Centrality · Democracy · Government (linguistics · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Sociology · European and International Law Studies · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration
The 'Why' and the 'How' of Policy Practice
Social Workers as Policy Actors
Representação política
How to measure the substantive representation of traditionally excluded groups in comparative research
Public Accounts Committees, New Public Management, and Institutionalism
Parliamentary reforms and Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
Legislative influence in House of Commons committees in Canada
Legislative committees in the Turkish Parliament
Parliamentary committees’ initiative powers in Sweden – Tactical exploitation by opposition parties
Social policy formulation and the role of professionals
Underrepresentation of Ethiopian–Israeli minority students in programmes for the gifted and talented
Policy Practice in Practice
Inter-institutional Rules and Division of Power in the European Parliament
The Committee System
Committee structure and political preferences
Explaining Gender Gaps in Legislative Committees
Who gets what and why? Committee assignments in the German Bundestag
Gender and Select Committee Elections in the British House of Commons
Conceptualizing and Measuring Women's Political Leadership
Gendered Patterns of Committee Assignments—To What Extent Are Women in Parliamentary Party Groups Game Changers
The UK post-legislative scrutiny gap
Encouraging a longer time horizon
The conditions of committee importance – drawing lessons from a qualitative case study of Finland
| Obras citantes distintas | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2003 - 2025 (23) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 23 |