Measuring design diversity
A new application of Ostrom's rule types
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6330709 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Claire A Dunlop (0000-0003-2122-1075, Department of Politics University of Exeter Exeter UK), Jonathan C Kamkhaji (0000-0002-1358-926X, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering Politecnico di Milano Milano Italy), Claudio M Radaelli (0000-0001-5056-5585, European University Institute, autor de correspondencia), Gaia Taffoni (0000-0003-0561-5410, European University Institute) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 50 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 432-452 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Policy Studies Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/psj.12440 |
| PMID | 35874188 |
| OpenAlex | W3186427542 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 14 |
| Referencias citadas | 28 |
We draw on the Institutional Grammar Tool's rule types to empirically analyze the design of four major procedural regulatory instruments in the 27 member states of the European Union and the UK. They are: consultation, regulatory impact assessment, freedom of information, and the Ombudsman. By adopting the Institutional Grammar Tool as conceptual lens we end up with a single measurement template applicable to a variety of action situations. We derive measures that are conceptually robust and suitable for comparative analysis. With original data gathered on the official legal base in the 28 cases, we carry out principal components analysis. We identify design patterns across countries and instruments; the specialization of each instrument in terms of rule type; and the components that best explain cross‐country variation. In the conclusions we argue that to reframe the design features of the four instruments in conceptual, theoretical categories is not simply a taxonomical exercise but it extends to the territory of comparative policy analysis, practice and reform
Art · Diversity (politics · Economics · Freedom of information · Grammar · Humanities · Law and economics · Linguistics · Political science · Regional science · Sociology · Welfare economics · European and International Law Studies · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Philosophy · Public Administration · Regulation and Compliance Studies
The Use of the Institutional Grammar 1.0 for Institutional Analysis
Calibration and specification in policy practice
A Comprehensive Taxonomy of Rules for Nuanced Analysis of Governance Systems
Health policy under the microscope
From Niches to the Mainstream
The Institutional Grammar
The Micro-Governance of Collaborative Networks for Water Protection
Policy Innovation
Understanding regulation using the Institutional Grammar 2.0
Measuring design diversity
The institutional grammar in policy process research
Understanding the Impact of Institutions on Climate‐Adaptive Policy Designs
A grammar of institutions for complex legal topics
Regulation and its metrics
Theories of the Policy Process
Networks of Adjacent Action Situations in Polycentric Governance
Designing Research in the Social Sciences
Understanding Institutional Diversity
More inclusive European governance through impact assessments
Regulatory indicators in the European Union and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
Assessing Policy Divergence
The Politics of Freedom of Information
Better Regulation in Europe
Measuring policy learning
Designing stakeholder consultations
Rationality, Power, Management and Symbols
Regulatory policy outputs and impacts
Measuring design diversity
Institutional Analysis with the Institutional Grammar
Dissecting Policy Designs
Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
Layering Action Situations to Integrate Spatial Scales, Resource Linkages, and Change over Time
Integrating core concepts from the institutional analysis and development framework for the systematic analysis of policy designs
Does consultation count for corruption? The causal relations in the EU-28
Diffusion without convergence
Regulating Rule‐Making via Impact Assessment
A sleeping giant awakes? The rise of the Institutional Grammar Tool (IGT) in policy research
A Grammar of Institutions
| Obras citantes distintas | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 13 |