Centralization in the BJP
Its Impact on Descriptive Representation of Gender and Ethnicity and the Local Party System
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7168577 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Dishil Shrimankar (0000-0003-2919-6054, University of Manchester, autor de correspondencia), Arvind Kumar (0009-0009-1715-5686, University of Hertfordshire) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 34 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-01-01 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1960-6060 • E-ISSN: 1960-6060 |
| Editorial | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/15afg |
| OpenAlex | W4417056235 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 27 |
This paper examines the effects of organizational centralization on two key dimensions of Indian politics within the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP): the descriptive representation of marginalized social groups and the configuration of local party systems. While comparative research, particularly from Western democracies, suggests that centralized candidate selection can promote inclusion by bypassing local elites, we test this claim in the context of India’s increasingly centralized ruling party. Using a dataset on candidate renomination from 1984 to 2019, we show that the BJP became significantly more centralized in the post-2014 period. We assess whether this organizational shift led to greater representation of women and lower-caste candidates, particularly in seats where sitting MPs were replaced. While some individual substitutions suggest a modest attempt at broadening representation—such as replacing upper-caste male incumbents with lower caste or female candidates—these changes were neither systematic nor widespread. Further, aggregate analysis of turnout, electoral volatility, and party-system fragmentation at the constituency level shows little evidence that such representational shifts had major systemic effects. Nevertheless, constituencies—where both caste and gender of the BJP candidate changed in more inclusive directions—did exhibit reduced party system fragmentation, suggesting some consolidation of voter support. Our findings challenge the assumption that centralization inherently promotes inclusion, and they highlight the need to theorize intra-party dynamics and representational outcomes within the specific institutional and social contexts of the Global South
Caste · Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Politics and Society in Latin America
Democracy within Parties
Gender and Political Recruitment
The stringdist Package for Approximate String Matching
Organizing a Victory
One nation,” BJP, and the future of Indian federalism
Candidate selection in India
Incumbency, internal processes and renomination in Indian parties
Why regional parties succeed at the sub-national level in India
Women candidates, women voters, and the gender politics of India’s 2019 parliamentary election
The dynamics of federal (in)stability and negotiated cooperation under single-party dominance
The politics of vishwas
India, Consociational Theory, and Ethnic Violence
The Congress 'System' in India
Nationalisation of multilevel party systems
Party Strategies and the Descriptive Representation of Ethnic Minorities
Party System Institutionalization and Economic Voting
Electoral Volatility and Turnout
Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates
Determinants of Candidate Selection
Modi Consolidates Power
Competing Inequalities? On the Intersection of Gender and Ethnicity in Candidate Nominations in Indian Elections
Incumbency, Parties, and Legislatures
Effective” Number of Parties
Determinants of Legislative Turnover
India’s States
| Altamente citado | No |
|---|