Facial first impressions from another angle
How social judgements are influenced by changeable and invariant facial properties
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7676402 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Clare A M Sutherland (0000-0003-0443-3412, ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders School of Psychology University of Western Australia Crawley WA Australia, autor de correspondencia), Andrew W Young (0000-0002-1202-6297, Department of Psychology University of York Heslington North Yorkshire UK), Gary Rhodes (0000-0002-3631-8518, The University of Western Australia), Gillian Rhodes (ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders School of Psychology University of Western Australia Crawley WA Australia) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Volumen | 108 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 397-415 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | British Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/bjop.12206 |
| PMID | 27443971 |
| OpenAlex | W2479750831 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 37 |
| Referencias citadas | 48 |
First impressions made to photographs of faces can depend as much on momentary characteristics of the photographed image (within‐person variability) as on consistent properties of the face of the person depicted (between‐person variability). Here, we examine two important sources of within‐person variability: emotional expression and viewpoint. We find more within‐person variability than between‐person variability for social impressions of key traits of trustworthiness, dominance, and attractiveness, which index the main dimensions in theoretical models of facial impressions. The most important source of this variability is the emotional expression of the face, but the viewpoint of the photograph also affects impressions and modulates the effects of expression. For example, faces look most trustworthy with a happy expression when they are facing the perceiver, compared to when they are facing elsewhere, whereas the opposite is true for anger and disgust. Our findings highlight the integration of these different sources of variability in social impression formation
Cognitive psychology · Facial expression · Invariant (physics) · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Communication · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Face Recognition and Perception · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology
The effect of opponent’s emotional facial expressions on individuals’ cooperation and underlying mechanism in prisoner’s dilemma game
The effects of facial attractiveness and trustworthiness in online peer-to-peer markets
The unique contributions of perceiver and target characteristics in person perception
Sociology of the Fear of Crime
Pon tu mejor cara! La influencia de la expresión facial en la confianza percibida y la capacidad para gobernar
‘Imagine you’re in the Opera House … ’ Learning nonverbal communication for the concert stage
Independent measurement of face perception, face matching, and face memory reveals impairments in face perception and memory, but not matching, in autism
Name-face congruence
Dictators’ facial characteristics and foreign direct investment
Do photos matter? the effect of hosts’ facial features on customers’ booking intentions in peer-to-peer accommodation
Getting close to beauty makes you better
Good video game players look better
Welcome to the Gray Zone
Accuracy in Facial Trustworthiness Impressions
Effects of emotional variability on social evaluations of faces
What will we judge a book by its cover?—Content analysis of face perception in a Chinese sample
Differences in Variance, Skewness, and Kurtosis Can Account for Differences in Binary Outcomes
Facial First Impressions of Partner Preference Traits
The relationship of Twitter with teacher credibility and motivation in university students
Physician's online image and patient's choice in the online health community
How Can I Trust You? The Role of Facial Trustworthiness in the Development of Epistemic and Interpersonal Trust
Testing the functional basis of first impressions
Neural dynamics of attentional Bias
Attention promotes accurate impression formation
Misperception of non-Happy Facial Features
Predicting attractiveness from face parts reveals multiple covarying cues
Comparison of face‐based and voice‐based first impressions in a Chinese sample
The interpersonal effects of emotions in money versus candy games
Understanding the role of faces in person perception
How resistant are implicit impressions of facial trustworthiness? When new evidence leads to durable updating
The right man for the job? Dictators’ selection mode and their facial characteristics
Do facial first impressions reflect a shared social reality
Should I trust you? Autistic traits predict reduced appearance-based trust decisions
Facial and self-report questionnaire measures capture different aspects of romantic partner preferences
Facial first impressions and partner preference models
Understanding trait impressions from faces
How does familiarity with a voice affect trait judgements
Social Attributions from Faces
Social inferences from faces
Social attributions from faces bias human choices
PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python
Variability in photos of the same face
Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences
The distributed human neural system for face perception
The functional basis of face evaluation
Emotional versus neutral expressions and perceptions of social dominance and submissiveness
Attractiveness judgements of individuals vary across emotional expression and movement conditions
Knowing Who's Boss
What is smiling is beautiful and good
You're only as pretty as you feel
Understanding face recognition
Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation
Mental representations of familiar faces
| Obras citantes distintas | 37 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4,11 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 34 |