Epistemic Benefits of Elaborated and Systematized Delusions in Schizophrenia
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 8399435 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lisa Bortolotti (0000-0003-0507-4650, University of Birmingham, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2016 |
| Volumen | 67 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 879-900 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2016-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjps/axv024 |
| PMID | 27924116 |
| OpenAlex | W2280981075 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 9 |
| Referencias citadas | 36 |
In this article I ask whether elaborated and systematized delusions emerging in the context of schizophrenia have the potential for epistemic innocence. Cognitions are epistemically innocent if they have significant epistemic benefits that could not be attained otherwise. In particular, I propose that a cognition is epistemically innocent if it delivers some significant epistemic benefit to a given agent at a given time, and if alternative cognitions delivering the same epistemic benefit are unavailable to that agent at that time. Elaborated and systematized delusions in schizophrenia are typically false and exemplify failures of rationality and self-knowledge. Empirical studies suggest that they may have psychological benefits by relieving anxiety and enhancing meaningfulness. Moreover, these delusions have been considered as adaptive in virtue of the fact that they enable automated learning to resume after a significant disruption caused by incorrect prediction-error signalling. I argue that such psychological benefits and adaptive features also have positive epistemic consequences. More precisely, delusions can be a means to restoring epistemic functionality in agents who are overwhelmed by hypersalient experiences in the prodromal stage of psychosis. The analysis leads to a more complex view of the epistemic status of delusions than is found in the contemporary philosophical literature and has some implications for clinical practice. 1 Introduction 2 Types of Delusions 3 What Is Wrong with Elaborated and Systematized Delusions? 4 Finding Life Meaningful 5 Learning Resumed 6 Epistemic Innocence 7 Epistemic Benefit 8 No Alternatives 9 Conclusions and Implications
Cognition · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Psychiatry · Rationality · Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming) · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Philosophy · Psychology · Schizophrenia research and treatment
The epistemic innocence of psychedelic states
How Stereotypes Deceive Us
The Epistemic Innocence of Elaborated Delusions Re-Examined
Is the biological adaptiveness of delusions doomed
Causal Connections Between Anorexia Nervosa and Delusional Beliefs
Solving the self-illness ambiguity
Are delusions adaptive? An empirical and philosophical study on delusions in OCD
Conspiracy Beliefs and Monothematic Delusions
Delusions, Evidence, and the Limits of Epistemic Classification
The Development of Meaning in Life †
Psychosis as a State of Aberrant Salience
Monothematic Delusions
The epistemic innocence of motivated delusions
General Psychopathology
In Defence of the Doxastic Conception of Delusions
All things considered duties to believe
Epistemology and Cognition
A (Different) Virtue Epistemology
Disorders of attention and perception in early schizophrenia
Distinguishing Justifications from Excuses
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,9 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |