Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Managed Health Plan Effects on the Specialty Referral Process

Results from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network Referral Study

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9102689
AutoresChristopher B Forrest (0000-0003-1252-068X, Johns Hopkins University, autor de correspondencia), Paul Nutting (University of Colorado Denver), James J Werner (University of Colorado Denver), Barbara Starfield (Johns Hopkins University, autor de correspondencia), Sarah von Schrader (0000-0002-3541-1374, Johns Hopkins University, autor de correspondencia), Charles A Rohde (0000-0002-7671-2480, Johns Hopkins University), Charles Rohde
Año2003
Volumen41
Número2
Páginas242-253
Fecha de publicación2003-02-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/01.mlr.0000044903.91168.b6
PMID12555052
OpenAlexW2068629806
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas22

OBJECTIVES: The specialty referral process is one of the chief targets of managed care constraints on ambulatory medical decision-making. This study examines the influence of gatekeeping arrangements and capitated primary care physician (PCP) payment on the specialty referral process in primary care settings. RESEARCH DESIGN: Primary care practice-based study of referred and nonreferred office visits. SUBJECTS: The study comprised 14,709 visits made by privately insured, nonelderly patients who were seen by 139 primary care physicians in 80 practices located in 31 states. MEASURES: Visits were grouped by health plan type: gatekeeping with capitated PCP payment; gatekeeping with fee-for-service PCP payment; no gatekeeping. Dependent measures included the proportion of visits referred, characteristics of referrals, and physician coordination activities. RESULTS: The percentages of office visits resulting in a referral were similar between the two gatekeeping groups and higher than the no gatekeeping group. Patients in plans with capitated PCP payment were more likely to be referred for discretionary indications than those in nongatekeeping plans (15.5% v 9.9%, P < 0.05). The frequency of referring physician coordination activities did not vary by health plan type. The proportion of patients in gatekeeping health plans within a practice was directly related to employing staff as referral coordinators, allowing nurses to refer without physician consultation, and permitting patients to request referrals by leaving recorded telephone messages. CONCLUSION: The specialty referral process for privately insured nonelderly patients enrolled in managed health plans is generally similar, regardless of the presence of gatekeeping arrangements and capitated PCP payment. An increase in the number of discretionary referrals among patients in plans with capitated PCP payment provides support for exploring strategies that encourage PCPs to manage in their entirety conditions that straddle the boundaries between primary and specialty care. In response to increasing numbers of patients enrolled in managed health plans with gatekeeping arrangements, physicians appear to modify the structure of their practices to facilitate access to and coordination of referrals

Business · Capitation · Family medicine · Gatekeeping · Health care · Managed care · Payment · Referral · Specialty · Finance · Healthcare Policy and Management · Healthcare Systems and Technology · Medicine · Primary Care and Health Outcomes

  • Effect of a gatekeeper plan on health services use and charges

    Diane P Martins, D P Martin et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1989

  • Entry into primary care and continuity

    C B Forrest, Barbara Starfield•American Journal of Public Health•1998

  • Physician Response to Patient Insurance Status in Ambulatory Care Clinical Decision-Making

    ELIZABETH A MORT, Elizabeth Mort et al.•Medical Care•1996

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae