Physician Response to Patient Insurance Status in Ambulatory Care Clinical Decision-Making

Implications for Quality of Care

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9102927
AutoresELIZABETH A MORT, Elizabeth Mort (0000-0003-0570-5942, Massachusetts General Hospital), JENNIFER N EDWARDS (Massachusetts Mental Health Center), DAVID W EMMONS (Massachusetts Mental Health Center), KAREN CONVERY (Massachusetts Mental Health Center), David Blumenthal (0000-0002-4668-0617, Massachusetts Mental Health Center)
Año1996
Volumen34
Número8
Páginas783-797
Fecha de publicación1996-08-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditorialOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-199608000-00006
PMID8709660
OpenAlexW2037950658
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas10
Referencias citadas32

OBJECTIVES: Individuals without health insurance in general receive fewer health services and are more likely than insured patients to experience poor outcomes. The main goal of this research was to study whether physicians' clinical recommendations vary for insured and uninsured patients, implying that physicians' choices of care may mediate insurance-related differences in health care use. METHODS: The authors designed clinical scenarios that describe routine decisions encountered by primary care physicians in ambulatory settings. Scenarios were designed to include discretionary, nondiscretionary, preventive, and diagnostic/therapeutic services. Insurance status of patients was indicated as either insured or uninsured for the service under consideration. Scenarios were presented to a nationally representative sample of primary care physicians (n = 1182) as part of the American Medical Association 1992 Socio-economic Monitoring System Survey. Physicians were assigned randomly to receive eight scenarios in which patients were either insured or uninsured. For each scenario, physicians were asked to indicate the percentage of patients for whom they would recommend a given service. RESULTS: After controlling for variables associated with nonresponse, we found that physicians who were presented scenarios with insured patients recommended service for 72% of patients, and physicians who were presented scenarios with uninsured patients recommended the same services for 67% of patients (P < 0.001). Physicians recommended both discretionary services (50% versus 42%; P < 0.001) and nondiscretionary services more often for insured than uninsured patients (93% versus 91%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In self-reports, physicians are more likely to recommend services for insured than for uninsured patients, and more so when services are discretionary. This provides evidence that physicians' recommendations may be important mediators of insurance-related variation in the use of health-care services. Higher rates of use among the insured may not always reflect higher quality of care, particularly when the service is discretionary in nature

Actuarial science · Ambulatory · Ambulatory care · Business · Clinical decision making · Economics · Family medicine · Health care · Intensive care medicine · MEDLINE · Healthcare Policy and Management · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Primary Care and Health Outcomes