Accounting for Variation in Technical Quality and Patient Satisfaction
The Contribution of Patient, Provider, Team, and Medical Center
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9102907 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kelly Stolzmann (0000-0002-3491-9803, VA Boston Healthcare System, autor de correspondencia), Kelly L Stolzmann, Mark Meterko (0000-0002-2818-8725, VA Boston Healthcare System, autor de correspondencia), Michael Shwartz (0000-0003-4840-1682, Boston University, autor de correspondencia), Gary J Young (0000-0002-4223-9971, VA Boston Healthcare System, autor de correspondencia), Erol A Peköz (0000-0002-7459-7562, Boston University), Justin K Benzer (0000-0001-5151-2127, VA Boston Healthcare System, autor de correspondencia), Katerine Osatuke, Bert White (VA Boston Healthcare System, autor de correspondencia), David C Mohr (0000-0002-5443-7596, VA Boston Healthcare System, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2010 |
| Volumen | 48 |
| Número | 8 |
| Páginas | 676-682 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2010-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editorial | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181e35b1f |
| PMID | 20613661 |
| OpenAlex | W2104875339 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 32 |
BACKGROUND: The delivery of healthcare depends on individual providers, coordination within teams, and the structure of the work setting. We analyzed the amount of variation in technical quality and patient satisfaction accounted for at the patient, provider, team, and medical center level. METHODS: Data abstracted from Veterans Health Administration patient medical records for 2007 were used to calculate measures of technical quality based on adherence to best practice guidelines in 5 domains. Outpatient satisfaction was obtained from a 2007 standardized national mail survey. Hierarchical linear models that accounted for the clustering of patients within providers, providers within teams, and teams within medical centers were used to partition the variation in technical quality and satisfaction across patients and components of the system (ie, providers, teams, and medical centers). RESULTS: Providers accounted for the largest percent of system-level variance for all technical quality domains, ranging from 46.5% to 71.9%. For the single-item measure of patient satisfaction, medical centers, teams, and providers accounted for about the same percent of system-level variance (31%-34%). For the doctor/patient interaction scale providers explained 59.9% of system-level variance, more than double that of teams and medical centers. For all the measures, the residual variance (composed of patient-level and random error) explained the largest proportion of the total variance. CONCLUSIONS: Providers explained the greatest amount of system-level variation in technical quality and patient satisfaction. However, in both of these domains, differences between patients were the predominant source of nonrandom variance
Business · Explained variation · Family medicine · Health care · Multilevel model · Patient satisfaction · Quality (philosophy) · Statistics · Variance (accounting) · Accounting · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Safety and Medication Errors · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Primary Care and Health Outcomes
The Quality of Care
Using a single‐item approach to measure facet job satisfaction
Using SAS PROC Mixed to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models
What Makes Teams Work
A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey
Patient Satisfaction with the General Practitioner
Using Knowledge of Multiple Levels of Variation in Care to Target Performance Incentives to Providers
Patient Satisfaction With Hospital Care
Attributing Sources of Variation in Patients’ Experiences of Ambulatory Care
Gender Differences in Practice Style
Do Attending or Resident Physician Practice Styles Account for Variations in Hospital Resource Use
Meaningful Variation in Performance
Meaningful Variation in Performance
Patient satisfaction revisited
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,29 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2012 - 2021 (10) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |