La correspondance de F.-A. Pouchet avec les membres de l'Académie des Sciences

Une réévaluation du débat sur la génération spontanée

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9609840
AutoresDominique Raynaud (0000-0001-7750-6884, Université Pierre Mendes France, autor de correspondencia)
Año1999
Volumen40
Número2
Páginas257-276
Fecha de publicación1999-11-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEuropean Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0003-9756 • E-ISSN: 1474-0583
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0003975600007475
OpenAlexW2172118432
IdiomaFR
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas20

The controversy between Pasteur and Pouchet on spontaneous generation (1859–1864) has received great interest in the sociology of scientific knowledge. This paper shows that some statements were shifted by Pennetier's biased version (1907). The study of the correspondence between Pouchet and the members of the Academie des Sciences reveals that Pouchet was on intimate terms with many members of this institution, and also that the two commissions appointed in 1862 and 1864 did not collude with any Pastorian lobby. The discovery of Pouchet's forgery leads to a quite different estimate of this controversy. Pouchet's defeat can be explained by his repeated retreats in front of the commissions, his dogmatic faith in heterogeny, lobbying by the press, and an immoderate need for glory. Beyond the lack of replies to the rationale against heterogeny, such a transgression of the norms of scientific ethos seems to have been a source of irritation among the Academicians

Epistemology · Ethos · Faith · Glory · Humanities · Political science · Sociology · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · Law · Philosophy