Modelling the Take-up of Means-Tested Benefits
The Case of Housing Benefits in the United Kingdom
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9706846 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Richard Blundell (0000-0003-1588-2299, Institute for Fiscal Studies), Vanessa Fry (0000-0001-9300-119X, Institute for Fiscal Studies), Ian Walker (0000-0002-0079-3149) |
| Año | 1988 |
| Volumen | 98 |
| Número | 390 |
| Páginas | 58 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1988-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Economic Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0013-0133 • E-ISSN: 1468-0297 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2233304 |
| OpenAlex | W2030438422 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 31 |
| Referencias citadas | 1 |
Journal Article Modelling the Take-up of Means-Tested Benefits: The Case of Housing Benefits in the United Kingdom Get access Richard Blundell, Richard Blundell University College London and the Institute for Fiscal Studies Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Vanessa Fry, Vanessa Fry Essex University and the Institute for Fiscal Studies Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Ian Walker Ian Walker Manchester University and the Institute for Fiscal Studies Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 98, Issue 390, 1 April 1988, Pages 58–74, https://doi.org/10.2307/2233304 Published: 01 April 1988
Economic history · Economics · Kingdom · Library science · Political science · Computer Science · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Housing Market and Economics · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
The Normative Analysis of Tagging Revisited
Why do eligible individuals fail to enrol for social assistance programmes? A systematic narrative review of factors affecting take-up
Social benefits in Uruguay
Estimating the Impact of a Policy Reform on Benefit Take‐up
Estimating and Testing a Model of Welfare Participation
Labor Market Discrimination and Sorting
A New Targeting - A New Take-Up? Non-Take-Up of Social Assistance in Germany after Social Policy Reforms
Modelling the take-up of state support
Immigrant Participation in the German Welfare Program
Misreporting of program take-up in survey data and its consequences for measuring non-take-up
The differential impact of socioeconomic status indicators on values and self-mastery ( El impacto diferencial de los indicadores del nivel socioeconómico en los valores y el autodominio )
Are Negative Community Attitudes Toward Welfare Recipients Associated With Unemployment? Evidence From an Australian Cross-Sectional Sample and Longitudinal Cohort
The targeting efficiency of rural social assistance programmes and income inequality
Optimizing Engagement
To take or not to take? An overview of the factors contributing to the non-take-up of public provisions
From formal rights to real opportunities
Worth the effort? Compliance costs, heuristics, and perceived program accessibility
Rental subsidies and take‐up barriers in an era of expensive rents
Welfare or Work? Low-Income Working Households' Housing Consumption in the Private Rented Sector in England
Non-take-up of tax-favored savings plans
What Other Programs Can Teach Us
Housing Benefit and Income Redistribution
Social relationships, stigma, and wellbeing through experiences of homelessness in the United Kingdom
The effectiveness of Luxembourg's minimum guaranteed income
Redistributive Effects of Transfer Programmes in the United Kingdom
The Labour Supply, Unemployment and Participation of Lone Mothers in In‐Work Transfer Programmes
The Manitoba Healthy Baby Prenatal Benefit Program
Information Costs and the Non‐Take‐Up of Social Benefits
Increasing Inequality
Targeting Performance under Self-selection and Administrative Targeting Methods
Why Do Poor People Not Take up Benefits? Evidence from the Barcelona's B-Mincome Experiment
| Obras citantes distintas | 31 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,94 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1993 - 2026 (34) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 26 |