Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Responsible public bureaucracy

A rationale and a framework for analysis

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9784748
AutoresKenneth Kernaghan (Brock University, autor de correspondencia)
Año1973
Volumen16
Número4
Páginas572-603
Fecha de publicación1973-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaCanadian Public Administration (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0008-4840 • E-ISSN: 1754-7121
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1754-7121.1973.tb01636.x
OpenAlexW2089930343
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas14
Referencias citadas4

The longstanding concern of scholars and practitioners for the re conciliation of administrative power and administrative responsibility has become more acute in recent years. Both the conventional theory and the existing practice relating to administrative responsibility are inadequate for the needs of contemporary public bureaucracies. A distinction between objective and subjective responsibility provides a focus on the sources of administrative responsibility and on the values of public servants. In this essay, these two elements are examined separately by means of an institutional framework and a value framework for administrative decision‐making. Then the theoretical bonds between the two frameworks are demonstrated with reference to administrative responsibility. The links between the concepts of administrative responsibility and the public interest serve as a base for a description of two hypothetically extreme types of bureaucrat — the objectively responsible and the subjectively responsible official. A number of hypotheses relating to administrative responsibility are formulated and the conclusion is drawn that subjective responsibility is becoming increasingly important for the achievement of responsible public bureaucracy. Sommaire. Le désir de longue date des théoriciens et des praticiens de réconcilier pouvoir administratif et responsabilité administrative s'est intensifié au cours des dernières années. La théone classique et la pratique existante de la responsabilité administrative sont insuffisantes pour répondre aux besoins des bureaucraties publiques contemporaines. En faisant une distinction entre la responsabilité objective et la responsabilité subjective, on peut dégager les sources de la responsabilité administrative et les valeurs des fonctionnaires. Dam cette étude, l'auteur examine séparément ces deux éléments à l'aide d'un cadre d'analyse institutionnel et normatif de la prise de décision en administration. Il démontre ensuite les rapports théoriques entre ces deux cadres d'analyse en ce qui concerne la responsabilité administrative. Les liens entre les concepts de responsabilité administrative et d'intérêt public servent de base à la description de deux types hypothétiques extrêmes de bureaucrats:le fonctionnaire responsable objectivement et le fonctionnaire responsable subjectivement. L'auteur formule un certain nombre d'hypothèses sur la responsabilité administrative et terrnine en disant que la responsabilité subjective devient de plus en plus importante pour parvenir à une bureaucratie publique responsable

Bureaucracy · Economics · Political science · Politics · Welfare economics · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Public Administration

  • A Comparative Study of Zambia and Mozambique

    Open Access•Mokubung O Nkomo, Mokubung Nkomo•Journal of Black Studies•1986

  • Power, Parliament and Public Servants in Canada

    Kenneth Kernaghan•Canadian Public Policy•1979

  • Administrative responsibility in a developing country

    Open Access•Gatian F Lungu•Public Administration and…•1983

  • Rationality and the Problems of Administrative Theory

    Open Access•Richard Hartwig, R O Hartwig•Public Administration•1978

  • Government “responsibility” and responsible government

    Ian Thynne, John Goldring•Politics•1981

  • Teaching Ethics in Public Administration Courses

    Open Access•Om Prakash Dwivedi•International Review of…•1988

  • Codes of ethics and administrative responsibility

    Open Access•Kenneth Kernaghan•Canadian Public Administration•1974

  • Technical decisions and public accountability

    Open Access•Roger Williams, Roger J Williams et al.•Canadian Public Administration•1976

  • Changing concepts of power and responsibility in the Canadian public service

    Open Access•Kenneth Kernaghan•Canadian Public Administration•1978

  • Conscience and conformity

    Open Access•H L Laframboise•Canadian Public Administration•1983

  • Politics, policy and public servants

    Open Access•Kenneth Kemaghan•Canadian Public Administration•1976

  • The conscience of the bureaucrat

    Open Access•Kenneth Kernughan•Canadian Public Administration•1984

  • Legislators, Bureaucrats, and Canadian Democracy

    Open Access•Lee Sigelman, William G Vanderbok et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•1977

  • The global relevance of Canadian public administration? A bibliometric research note

    Open Access•Eric S Zeemering•Canadian Public Administration•2018

  • The Role of the Deputy Minister

    Open Access•Andrew Johnson, A W Johnson•Canadian Public Administration•1961

  • The Framework of Administrative Responsibility

    Charles E Gilbert•The Journal of Politics•1959

  • The Crucial Link

    Herbert J Storing, Carl J Friedrich et al.•Public Administration Review•1964

  • Fundamental Approaches to Administrative Responsibility

    Open Access•Arch Dotson•The Western Political Quarterly•1957

Obras citantes distintas14
Citas por año0,27
Intervalo de citas1974 - 2018 (45)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 14
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae