Janneke Gitsels
Biographic Data
| ID | 10157902 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Janneke Gitsels |
| GIVEN NAMES | Janneke |
| FAMILY NAME | Gitsels |
| SIGNATURE | GITSELS J |
| AFFILIATIONS | University Medical Center Groningen |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5742-7246 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Dutch Christian Faith Leaders Deliberating Human Germline Gene Editing
While human germline gene editing (HGGE) is not allowed, the World Health Organization and others called for public dialogue to clarify the values at stake. Some values may be rooted in religion, such as Christianity, and relevant to religious communities and wider society. In-depth interviews (N = 16) were conducted with Dutch Christian faith leaders in 2019 and 2024. Participants were asked about their views and underlying values, their possibl…
The impact of counselors’ values and religious beliefs on their role identity and perspectives on heritable genome editing
The implementation of the noninvasive prenatal test has shown the importance of involving future care providers in healthcare innovations at an early stage. Therefore, in this explorative study in-depth interviews were performed with Dutch midwife counselors who explicitly identify as religious, to explore how they currently deal with their worldview during counseling for prenatal anomaly screening and regarding their perspectives on heritable ge…
Between desire and fear
Human genome editing technologies are advancing at a rapid pace, and their potential disruptive implications lead to ethical and societal questions that cannot be addressed by scientists alone. Further consideration of different stakeholders’ views on human genome editing is crucial to translate society’s needs and values into thoughtful regulations and policies. We therefore explored the views of carriers of autosomal dominant disorders on somat…
No prominent works on this page.
Between desire and fear
Human genome editing technologies are advancing at a rapid pace, and their potential disruptive implications lead to ethical and societal questions that cannot be addressed by scientists alone. Further consideration of different stakeholders’ views on human genome editing is crucial to translate society’s needs and values into thoughtful regulations and policies. We therefore explored the views of carriers of autosomal dominant disorders on somat…
The impact of counselors’ values and religious beliefs on their role identity and perspectives on heritable genome editing
The implementation of the noninvasive prenatal test has shown the importance of involving future care providers in healthcare innovations at an early stage. Therefore, in this explorative study in-depth interviews were performed with Dutch midwife counselors who explicitly identify as religious, to explore how they currently deal with their worldview during counseling for prenatal anomaly screening and regarding their perspectives on heritable ge…
Dutch Christian Faith Leaders Deliberating Human Germline Gene Editing
While human germline gene editing (HGGE) is not allowed, the World Health Organization and others called for public dialogue to clarify the values at stake. Some values may be rooted in religion, such as Christianity, and relevant to religious communities and wider society. In-depth interviews (N = 16) were conducted with Dutch Christian faith leaders in 2019 and 2024. Participants were asked about their views and underlying values, their possibl…
Qualitative research (3 works) · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 works) · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Reflexivity (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Thematic analysis (2 works) · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (1 works) · Christian faith (1 works)