Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nicholas R Miller

Biographic Data

ID1047041
NAMENicholas R Miller
GIVEN NAMESNicholas R
FAMILY NAMEMiller
SIGNATUREMILLER N R
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County
ORCID0000-0001-6894-3919
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS28
TOTAL CITATIONS322
AUTHOR COUNT28
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1975
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX8
  • Helen Cowie Interview

    Helen Cowie, Helen Louise Cowie et al.•ARTICLE•Terrae Incognitae•2025

    Interview between Nicholas Miller and Helen Cowie on the role of animals in exploration, published as part of a special issue on this topic in the journal Terrae Incognitae

  • Ranked-choice voting and the spoiler effect: A supplementary note

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2024•References: 3

  • Animal Studies and Exploration History: Amundsen’s Sledge Dogs Who Helped Discover the South Pole

    Nicholas R Miller, Nicholas Miller•ARTICLE•Terrae Incognitae•2022

  • Reflections on Arrow’s theorem and voting rules

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2019•Cited by: 6•References: 29

  • Closeness matters: Monotonicity failure in IRV elections with three candidates

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2017•Cited by: 9•References: 15

  • Election Inversions under Proportional Representation

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Scandinavian Political Studies•2015•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    It has been shown by P eter K urrild‐ K litgaard, using several empirical examples under the D anish electoral system, that proportional representation ( PR ) can produce ‘election inversions’ such that a coalition of parties collectively supported by a majority of voters fails to win a majority of parliamentary seats. However, K urrild‐ K litgaard's examples result from imperfections in the D anish PR system introduced to serve goals other than …

  • What to Do About Election Inversions Under Proportional Representation

    Dan S Felsenthal, Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Representation•2015•Cited by: 3•References: 12

    An election inversion occurs when a party, or coalition of parties, wins more seats in the legislature than another party, or coalition of parties, despite the fact that the other party, or coalition of parties, won a larger number of votes cast in an election. It is well known that such inversions can and do occur under the kind of ‘majoritarian’ electoral systems commonly used in English-speaking countries. It has recently been observed that su…

  • The Alternative Vote and Coombs Rule versus First-Past-the-Post: A social choice analysis of simulated data based on English elections, 1992–2010

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2014•Cited by: 5•References: 10

  • The house size effect and the referendum paradox in U.S. presidential elections

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • Why the Electoral College is good for political science (and public choice)

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2012•Cited by: 12•References: 15

  • Banzhaf voting power, random elections, and the Electoral College winner’s advantage

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2011•References: 4

  • Agendas and sincerity: A second response to Schwartz

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2010•References: 3

  • Agenda trees and sincere voting: A response to Schwartz

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2009•Cited by: 3•References: 9

  • In Search of the Uncovered Set

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Political Analysis•2007•Cited by: 10•References: 25

    This paper pursues a number of theoretical explorations and conjectures pertaining to the uncovered set in spatial voting games. It was stimulated by the article “The Uncovered Set and the Limits of Legislative Action” by W. T. Bianco, I. Jeliazkov, and I. Sened (2004, Political Analysis 12:256—78) that employed a grid-search computational algorithm for estimating the size, shape, and location of the uncovered set, and it has been greatly facilit…

  • The butterfly effect under STV

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2007•Cited by: 1•References: 3

  • The structure of the Banks set

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller, B Grofman et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1990•Cited by: 3•References: 9

  • Cycle avoiding trajectories, strategic agendas, and the duality of memory and foresight: An informal exposition

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller, B Grofman et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1990•Cited by: 4•References: 23

  • The Geometry of Majority Rule

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller, B Grofman et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1989•Cited by: 27•References: 13

    We present some basic results concerning the spatial theory of voting in such a way that the theorems and their proofs should be accessible to a broad audience of political scientists. We do this by making the presentation essentially geometrical. We present the following results in particular: Plott's `pairwise symmetry' condition for an unbeaten point; McKelvey's `global cycling' theorem; Ferejohn, McKelvey and Packel's cardioid construction fo…

  • Centripetal forces in spatial voting: On the size of the Yolk

    Open Access•L Feld, Scott L Feld et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1988•Cited by: 16•References: 29

  • Nice Strategies Finish First: A Review of The Evolution of Cooperation

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•1985

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Bicameralism and the Theory of Voting: A Comment

    Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•The Western Political Quarterly•1984

  • Bicameralism and the Theory of Voting: A Comment

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•The Western Political Quarterly•1984•References: 5

  • Pluralism and Social Choice

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1983•Cited by: 49•References: 63

    Pluralist political theory identifies certain patterns of political preferences as promoting the "stability" of democratic political systems and others as threatening to such stability. Social choice theory likewise identifies certain patterns of political preferences as leading to "stability" in social choice under majority rule and related collective decision rules, and other patterns as leading to "unstable" social choice. But the preference p…

  • A New Solution Set for Tournaments and Majority Voting: Further Graph- Theoretical Approaches to the Theory of Voting

    Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•1980•Cited by: 120•References: 6

    The Condorcet, or minimal undominated, set of proposals has been identified as a solution set for majority voting. Unfortunately, the Condorcet set may be very large and may include Pareto-inefficient proposals. An alternative solution set is proposed here: the uncovered set, from which every other proposal in the tournament representing majority preference is reachable in no more than two steps. It is shown that this set has a number of desirabl…

  • Social preference” and game theory: A comment on “the dilemma of a paretian liberal”

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1977•Cited by: 4•References: 4

Next
  • A New Solution Set for Tournaments and Majority Voting: Further Graph- Theoretical Approaches to the Theory of Voting

    Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•1980•Cited by: 120•References: 6

    The Condorcet, or minimal undominated, set of proposals has been identified as a solution set for majority voting. Unfortunately, the Condorcet set may be very large and may include Pareto-inefficient proposals. An alternative solution set is proposed here: the uncovered set, from which every other proposal in the tournament representing majority preference is reachable in no more than two steps. It is shown that this set has a number of desirabl…

  • Pluralism and Social Choice

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1983•Cited by: 49•References: 63

    Pluralist political theory identifies certain patterns of political preferences as promoting the "stability" of democratic political systems and others as threatening to such stability. Social choice theory likewise identifies certain patterns of political preferences as leading to "stability" in social choice under majority rule and related collective decision rules, and other patterns as leading to "unstable" social choice. But the preference p…

  • Graph-Theoretical Approaches to the Theory of Voting

    Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•1977•Cited by: 38•References: 4

    In this article, language, concepts, and theorems from the theory of directed graphs are used to characterize and analyze the structure of majority preference. A number of results are then derived concerning sincere, sophisticated, and cooperative decisions under two common majority procedures. These results supplement the work of Black and Farquharson. Perhaps contrary to common-sense thinking, general strategic manipulation of processes has ben…

  • The Geometry of Majority Rule

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller, B Grofman et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1989•Cited by: 27•References: 13

    We present some basic results concerning the spatial theory of voting in such a way that the theorems and their proofs should be accessible to a broad audience of political scientists. We do this by making the presentation essentially geometrical. We present the following results in particular: Plott's `pairwise symmetry' condition for an unbeaten point; McKelvey's `global cycling' theorem; Ferejohn, McKelvey and Packel's cardioid construction fo…

  • Centripetal forces in spatial voting: On the size of the Yolk

    Open Access•L Feld, Scott L Feld et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1988•Cited by: 16•References: 29

  • Why the Electoral College is good for political science (and public choice)

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2012•Cited by: 12•References: 15

  • In Search of the Uncovered Set

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Political Analysis•2007•Cited by: 10•References: 25

    This paper pursues a number of theoretical explorations and conjectures pertaining to the uncovered set in spatial voting games. It was stimulated by the article “The Uncovered Set and the Limits of Legislative Action” by W. T. Bianco, I. Jeliazkov, and I. Sened (2004, Political Analysis 12:256—78) that employed a grid-search computational algorithm for estimating the size, shape, and location of the uncovered set, and it has been greatly facilit…

  • Closeness matters: Monotonicity failure in IRV elections with three candidates

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2017•Cited by: 9•References: 15

  • Logrolling, vote trading, and the paradox of voting: A game-theoretical overview

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1977•Cited by: 7•References: 17

  • Reflections on Arrow’s theorem and voting rules

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2019•Cited by: 6•References: 29

  • The Alternative Vote and Coombs Rule versus First-Past-the-Post: A social choice analysis of simulated data based on English elections, 1992–2010

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2014•Cited by: 5•References: 10

  • Cycle avoiding trajectories, strategic agendas, and the duality of memory and foresight: An informal exposition

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller, B Grofman et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1990•Cited by: 4•References: 23

  • Social preference” and game theory: A comment on “the dilemma of a paretian liberal”

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1977•Cited by: 4•References: 4

  • What to Do About Election Inversions Under Proportional Representation

    Dan S Felsenthal, Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Representation•2015•Cited by: 3•References: 12

    An election inversion occurs when a party, or coalition of parties, wins more seats in the legislature than another party, or coalition of parties, despite the fact that the other party, or coalition of parties, won a larger number of votes cast in an election. It is well known that such inversions can and do occur under the kind of ‘majoritarian’ electoral systems commonly used in English-speaking countries. It has recently been observed that su…

  • Agenda trees and sincere voting: A response to Schwartz

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2009•Cited by: 3•References: 9

  • The structure of the Banks set

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller, B Grofman et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1990•Cited by: 3•References: 9

  • Election Inversions under Proportional Representation

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Scandinavian Political Studies•2015•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    It has been shown by P eter K urrild‐ K litgaard, using several empirical examples under the D anish electoral system, that proportional representation ( PR ) can produce ‘election inversions’ such that a coalition of parties collectively supported by a majority of voters fails to win a majority of parliamentary seats. However, K urrild‐ K litgaard's examples result from imperfections in the D anish PR system introduced to serve goals other than …

  • Logrolling and the arrow paradox: A note

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1975•Cited by: 2•References: 6

  • The house size effect and the referendum paradox in U.S. presidential elections

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • The butterfly effect under STV

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2007•Cited by: 1•References: 3

  • Logrolling and the arrow paradox: A note

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1975•Cited by: 2•References: 6

  • Social preference” and game theory: A comment on “the dilemma of a paretian liberal”

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1977•Cited by: 4•References: 4

  • Logrolling, vote trading, and the paradox of voting: A game-theoretical overview

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1977•Cited by: 7•References: 17

  • Graph-Theoretical Approaches to the Theory of Voting

    Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•1977•Cited by: 38•References: 4

    In this article, language, concepts, and theorems from the theory of directed graphs are used to characterize and analyze the structure of majority preference. A number of results are then derived concerning sincere, sophisticated, and cooperative decisions under two common majority procedures. These results supplement the work of Black and Farquharson. Perhaps contrary to common-sense thinking, general strategic manipulation of processes has ben…

  • A New Solution Set for Tournaments and Majority Voting: Further Graph- Theoretical Approaches to the Theory of Voting

    Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•1980•Cited by: 120•References: 6

    The Condorcet, or minimal undominated, set of proposals has been identified as a solution set for majority voting. Unfortunately, the Condorcet set may be very large and may include Pareto-inefficient proposals. An alternative solution set is proposed here: the uncovered set, from which every other proposal in the tournament representing majority preference is reachable in no more than two steps. It is shown that this set has a number of desirabl…

  • Pluralism and Social Choice

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1983•Cited by: 49•References: 63

    Pluralist political theory identifies certain patterns of political preferences as promoting the "stability" of democratic political systems and others as threatening to such stability. Social choice theory likewise identifies certain patterns of political preferences as leading to "stability" in social choice under majority rule and related collective decision rules, and other patterns as leading to "unstable" social choice. But the preference p…

  • Bicameralism and the Theory of Voting: A Comment

    Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•The Western Political Quarterly•1984

  • Bicameralism and the Theory of Voting: A Comment

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•The Western Political Quarterly•1984•References: 5

  • Nice Strategies Finish First: A Review of The Evolution of Cooperation

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Politics and the Life Sciences•1985

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Centripetal forces in spatial voting: On the size of the Yolk

    Open Access•L Feld, Scott L Feld et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1988•Cited by: 16•References: 29

  • The Geometry of Majority Rule

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller, B Grofman et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1989•Cited by: 27•References: 13

    We present some basic results concerning the spatial theory of voting in such a way that the theorems and their proofs should be accessible to a broad audience of political scientists. We do this by making the presentation essentially geometrical. We present the following results in particular: Plott's `pairwise symmetry' condition for an unbeaten point; McKelvey's `global cycling' theorem; Ferejohn, McKelvey and Packel's cardioid construction fo…

  • The structure of the Banks set

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller, B Grofman et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1990•Cited by: 3•References: 9

  • Cycle avoiding trajectories, strategic agendas, and the duality of memory and foresight: An informal exposition

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller, B Grofman et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•1990•Cited by: 4•References: 23

  • In Search of the Uncovered Set

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Political Analysis•2007•Cited by: 10•References: 25

    This paper pursues a number of theoretical explorations and conjectures pertaining to the uncovered set in spatial voting games. It was stimulated by the article “The Uncovered Set and the Limits of Legislative Action” by W. T. Bianco, I. Jeliazkov, and I. Sened (2004, Political Analysis 12:256—78) that employed a grid-search computational algorithm for estimating the size, shape, and location of the uncovered set, and it has been greatly facilit…

  • The butterfly effect under STV

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2007•Cited by: 1•References: 3

  • Agenda trees and sincere voting: A response to Schwartz

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2009•Cited by: 3•References: 9

  • Agendas and sincerity: A second response to Schwartz

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2010•References: 3

  • Banzhaf voting power, random elections, and the Electoral College winner’s advantage

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2011•References: 4

  • Why the Electoral College is good for political science (and public choice)

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2012•Cited by: 12•References: 15

  • The Alternative Vote and Coombs Rule versus First-Past-the-Post: A social choice analysis of simulated data based on English elections, 1992–2010

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2014•Cited by: 5•References: 10

  • The house size effect and the referendum paradox in U.S. presidential elections

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Electoral Studies•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 2

  • Election Inversions under Proportional Representation

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Scandinavian Political Studies•2015•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    It has been shown by P eter K urrild‐ K litgaard, using several empirical examples under the D anish electoral system, that proportional representation ( PR ) can produce ‘election inversions’ such that a coalition of parties collectively supported by a majority of voters fails to win a majority of parliamentary seats. However, K urrild‐ K litgaard's examples result from imperfections in the D anish PR system introduced to serve goals other than …

  • What to Do About Election Inversions Under Proportional Representation

    Dan S Felsenthal, Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Representation•2015•Cited by: 3•References: 12

    An election inversion occurs when a party, or coalition of parties, wins more seats in the legislature than another party, or coalition of parties, despite the fact that the other party, or coalition of parties, won a larger number of votes cast in an election. It is well known that such inversions can and do occur under the kind of ‘majoritarian’ electoral systems commonly used in English-speaking countries. It has recently been observed that su…

  • Closeness matters: Monotonicity failure in IRV elections with three candidates

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2017•Cited by: 9•References: 15

  • Reflections on Arrow’s theorem and voting rules

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2019•Cited by: 6•References: 29

Political science (24 works) · Game Theory and Voting Systems (20 works) · Law (19 works) · Voting (17 works) · Economics (16 works) · Law (16 works) · Computer Science (15 works) · Mathematical economics (15 works) · Politics (15 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (14 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae