John Eric Marot
Biographic Data
| ID | 1055854 |
|---|---|
| NAME | John Eric Marot |
| GIVEN NAMES | John Eric |
| FAMILY NAME | Marot |
| SIGNATURE | MAROT J E |
| AFFILIATIONS | Keimyung University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 12 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 8 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 12 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1990 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2014 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Lenin, Bolshevism, and Social-Democratic Political Theory
Lars Lih has contributed to our knowledge of Russian Social Democracy lately. However, serious methodological flaws bedevil this advance in knowledge. Lih’s overall approach displays a very static understanding of political ideas in relation to political movements. In the first section, ‘Lenin, the St Petersburg Bolshevik Leadership, and the 1905 Soviet’, I challenge Lih’s position that Lenin never changed his mind about bringing socialist consci…
A Maverick in European Social Democracy
The October Revolution in Prospect and Retrospect
In a series of probing analytical essays, John Marot tracks the development of Bolshevism through the prism of pre-1917 intra-Russian Social Democratic controversies in politics and philosophy. For 1917, the author presents a critique of social historical interpretation of the Russian Revolution. Turning to NEP Russia, the author applies Robert Brenner's analysis of pre-capitalist modes of production and concludes that neither Bukharin nor Trotsk…
October Revolution in Prospect and Retrospect
Trotsky, the Left Opposition and the Rise of Stalinism
Political leadership and working‐class agency in the Russian revolution
A "Postmodern" Approach to the Russian Revolution? Comment on Suny
In Revision and Retreat in the Historiography of 1917: Social History and Its Critics (Russian Review, April 1994), Ronald G. Suny adamantly defends the still dominant interpretation of the Russian Revolution against a resurgent interpretation of it, advanced by Richard Pipes most notably. At the same time, and in a spirit of reconciliation, Suny invites both political and social historians to acknowledge and overcome their respective weaknesses …
Class conflict, political competition and social transformation
Marxism, science, materialism
Politics and Philosophy in Russian Social Democracy
Bolsheviks struggled to determine the political direction of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party. In 1909 a third tendency emerged, Vpered, whose chief theoretician and representative was Alexander Bogdanov. Bogdanov and the Vperedists opposed both the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks on fundamental questions of the revolutionary movement. Bogdanov was also a prominent exponent of neo-Kantianism or Machism in Russian Social Democracy and, alon…
The Bogdanov Issue
My essay [The Russian Review, July 1990] was an attempt to explain the Vperedist split, led by Bogdanov, from the Bolshevik faction of the RSDLP. In contrast to earlier interpretations, I tried to show that Bogdanov did not part from Lenin over their differences of philosophy, orthodox Plekhanovist materialism versus Mach's empiriocriticism. Nor did they separate because Bogdanov dissented from the Bolsheviks' decision to participate in the Duma,…
Alexander Bogdanov, Vpered, and the Role of the Intellectual in the Workers' Movement
John Eric Marot, Alexander Bogdanov, Vpered, and the Role of the Intellectual in the Workers' Movement, The Russian Review, Vol. 49, No. 3, Special Issue on Alexander Bogdanov (Jul., 1990), pp. 241-264
A Maverick in European Social Democracy
Alexander Bogdanov, Vpered, and the Role of the Intellectual in the Workers' Movement
John Eric Marot, Alexander Bogdanov, Vpered, and the Role of the Intellectual in the Workers' Movement, The Russian Review, Vol. 49, No. 3, Special Issue on Alexander Bogdanov (Jul., 1990), pp. 241-264
Trotsky, the Left Opposition and the Rise of Stalinism
A "Postmodern" Approach to the Russian Revolution? Comment on Suny
In Revision and Retreat in the Historiography of 1917: Social History and Its Critics (Russian Review, April 1994), Ronald G. Suny adamantly defends the still dominant interpretation of the Russian Revolution against a resurgent interpretation of it, advanced by Richard Pipes most notably. At the same time, and in a spirit of reconciliation, Suny invites both political and social historians to acknowledge and overcome their respective weaknesses …
Class conflict, political competition and social transformation
Marxism, science, materialism
The Bogdanov Issue
My essay [The Russian Review, July 1990] was an attempt to explain the Vperedist split, led by Bogdanov, from the Bolshevik faction of the RSDLP. In contrast to earlier interpretations, I tried to show that Bogdanov did not part from Lenin over their differences of philosophy, orthodox Plekhanovist materialism versus Mach's empiriocriticism. Nor did they separate because Bogdanov dissented from the Bolsheviks' decision to participate in the Duma,…
Alexander Bogdanov, Vpered, and the Role of the Intellectual in the Workers' Movement
John Eric Marot, Alexander Bogdanov, Vpered, and the Role of the Intellectual in the Workers' Movement, The Russian Review, Vol. 49, No. 3, Special Issue on Alexander Bogdanov (Jul., 1990), pp. 241-264
Politics and Philosophy in Russian Social Democracy
Bolsheviks struggled to determine the political direction of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party. In 1909 a third tendency emerged, Vpered, whose chief theoretician and representative was Alexander Bogdanov. Bogdanov and the Vperedists opposed both the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks on fundamental questions of the revolutionary movement. Bogdanov was also a prominent exponent of neo-Kantianism or Machism in Russian Social Democracy and, alon…
Marxism, science, materialism
Class conflict, political competition and social transformation
A "Postmodern" Approach to the Russian Revolution? Comment on Suny
In Revision and Retreat in the Historiography of 1917: Social History and Its Critics (Russian Review, April 1994), Ronald G. Suny adamantly defends the still dominant interpretation of the Russian Revolution against a resurgent interpretation of it, advanced by Richard Pipes most notably. At the same time, and in a spirit of reconciliation, Suny invites both political and social historians to acknowledge and overcome their respective weaknesses …
Political leadership and working‐class agency in the Russian revolution
Trotsky, the Left Opposition and the Rise of Stalinism
The October Revolution in Prospect and Retrospect
In a series of probing analytical essays, John Marot tracks the development of Bolshevism through the prism of pre-1917 intra-Russian Social Democratic controversies in politics and philosophy. For 1917, the author presents a critique of social historical interpretation of the Russian Revolution. Turning to NEP Russia, the author applies Robert Brenner's analysis of pre-capitalist modes of production and concludes that neither Bukharin nor Trotsk…
October Revolution in Prospect and Retrospect
A Maverick in European Social Democracy
Lenin, Bolshevism, and Social-Democratic Political Theory
Lars Lih has contributed to our knowledge of Russian Social Democracy lately. However, serious methodological flaws bedevil this advance in knowledge. Lih’s overall approach displays a very static understanding of political ideas in relation to political movements. In the first section, ‘Lenin, the St Petersburg Bolshevik Leadership, and the 1905 Soviet’, I challenge Lih’s position that Lenin never changed his mind about bringing socialist consci…
Political science (9 works) · Law (8 works) · Sociology (8 works) · Law (7 works) · Politics (7 works) · Philosophy (6 works) · Democracy (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Soviet and Russian History (5 works) · Epistemology (4 works)