The October Revolution in Prospect and Retrospect
Interventions in Russian and Soviet History
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23805327 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Eric Marot (corresponding author), John Marot |
| Year | 2012 |
| Publication date | 2012-06-08 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | October Revolution in Prospect and Retrospect (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/9789004229877 |
| OpenAlex | W1607405219 |
| ISBN | 9789004229877 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
In a series of probing analytical essays, John Marot tracks the development of Bolshevism through the prism of pre-1917 intra-Russian Social Democratic controversies in politics and philosophy. For 1917, the author presents a critique of social historical interpretation of the Russian Revolution. Turning to NEP Russia, the author applies Robert Brenner's analysis of pre-capitalist modes of production and concludes that neither Bukharin nor Trotsky's NEP-premised programs of economic transformation and advance toward socialism were feasible. At the same time, he rejects the view that Stalinism was pre-destined to supplant NEP. Instead, he hypothesises that the superior alternative to Stalinism was NEP without collectivization and the Five-Year Plans — a outcome that would have been possible had Bukharin and Trotsky joined forces to stop Stalin.
Communism · Democracy · Economic history · Interpretation (philosophy) · Physics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Prism · Russian revolution · Social democracy · Socialism · Sociology · History · Law · Philosophy · Soviet and Russian History
Número completo
The 1917 Russian Revolution and Eastern Orthodox Christian Utopianism
Convergencias contradictorias. Proletariado industrial y concepción programática bolchevique entre 1917 y 1929
From Revolution to Modernising Counter-Revolution in Russia, 1917–28
What Is a Philosophical Tendency
How Capitalist Were the ‘Bourgeois Revolutions’
Religion in Russian Marxism
A Maverick in European Social Democracy
| Citations per year | 0.62 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2020 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |