Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Kevin J S Zollman

Biographic Data

ID1062912
NAMEKevin J S Zollman
GIVEN NAMESKevin J S
FAMILY NAMEZollman
SIGNATUREZOLLMAN K J S
AFFILIATIONSCarnegie Mellon University
ORCID0000-0001-9776-1890
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS22
TOTAL CITATIONS204
WORKS AS AUTHOR22
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2005
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX9
  • Reflection, introspection, and book

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman, Kevin Dorst•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2025•References: 7

    The much‐debated Reflection principle states that a coherent agent's credences must match their estimates for their future credences. Defenders claim that there are Dutch‐book arguments in its favor, putting it on the same normative footing as probabilistic coherence. Critics claim that those arguments rely on the implicit, implausible assumption that the agent is introspective : that they are certain what their own credences are. In this paper, …

  • Academic Journals, Incentives, and the Quality of Peer Review

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman, Julian García et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2024

    We model the impact of different incentives on journal behavior in undertaking peer review. Under one scheme, the journal aims to publish the highest-quality papers; under the second, the journal aims to maintain a high rejection rate. Under both schemes, journals prefer to set very high standards for acceptance despite allowing significant error in peer review. Under the second scheme, however, in order to encourage more submissions of mediocre …

  • Explaining costly religious practices

    Open Access•Carl Brusse, Toby Handfield et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2022•Cited by: 1•References: 71

    This paper examines and contrasts two closely related evolutionary explanations in human behaviour: signalling theory, and the theory of Credibility Enhancing Displays (CREDs). Both have been proposed to explain costly, dangerous, or otherwise ‘extravagant’ social behaviours, especially in the context of religious belief and practice, and each have spawned significant lines of empirical research. However, the relationship between these two theore…

  • The theory of games as a tool for the social epistemologist

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • The computational philosophy

    Open Access•Conor Mayo-Wilson, J Mevel et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 7•References: 74

    Modeling and computer simulations, we claim, should be considered core philosophical methods. More precisely, we will defend two theses. First, philosophers should use simulations for many of the same reasons we currently use thought experiments. In fact, simulations are superior to thought experiments in achieving some philosophical goals. Second, devising and coding computational models instill good philosophical habits of mind. Throughout the …

  • Signals without teleology

    Open Access•Carl T Bergstrom, Simon M Huttegger et al.•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    Signals" are a conceptual apparatus in many scientific disciplines. Biologists inquire about the evolution of signals, economists talk about the signaling function of purchases and prices, and philosophers discuss the conditions under which signals acquire meaning. However, less attention has been paid to what is a signal. Most existing accounts are teleological in some way. This paper provides a definition of signals that avoids reference to for…

  • Conservatism and the Scientific State of Nature

    Erich Kummerfeld, Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2016•Cited by: 19•References: 9

    Those who comment on modern scientific institutions are often quick to praise institutional structures that leave scientists to their own devices. These comments reveal an underlying presumption that scientists do best when left alone—when they operate in what we call the ‘scientific state of nature’. Through computer simulation, we challenge this presumption by illustrating an inefficiency that arises in the scientific state of nature. This inef…

  • Dignity and the Value of Rejecting Profitable but Insulting Offers

    E Athanasiou, Alex John London et al.•ARTICLE•Mind•2015

    In this paper we distinguish two competing conceptions of dignity, one recognizably Hobbesian and one recognizably Kantian. We provide a formal model of how decision-makers committed to these conceptions of dignity might reason when engaged in an economic transaction that is not inherently insulting, but in which it is possible for the dignity of the agent to be called into question. This is a modified version of the ultimatum game. We then use t…

  • The Handicap Principle Is an Artifact

    Open Access•Simon M Huttegger, Justin P Bruner et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2015•Cited by: 5•References: 29

    The handicap principle is one of the most influential ideas in evolutionary biology. It asserts that when there is conflict of interest in a signaling interaction signals must be costly in order to be reliable. While in evolutionary biology it is a common practice to distinguish between indexes and fakable signals, we argue this dichotomy is an artifact of existing popular signaling models. Once this distinction is abandoned, we show one cannot a…

  • Introduction, SI of Synthese “The collective dimension of science”

    Open Access•Christophe Imbert, Cyrille Imbert et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2014

  • Methodology in Biological Game Theory

    Simon M Huttegger, Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2013•Cited by: 5•References: 29

    Game theory has a prominent role in evolutionary biology, in particular in the ecological study of various phenomena ranging from conflict behaviour to altruism to signalling and beyond. The two central methodological tools in biological game theory are the concepts of Nash equilibrium and evolutionarily stable strategy. While both were inspired by a dynamic conception of evolution, these concepts are essentially static—they only show that a popu…

  • Network Epistemology

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2013•Cited by: 13•References: 24

    Much of contemporary knowledge is generated by groups not single individuals. A natural question to ask is, what features make groups better or worse at generating knowledge? This paper surveys research that spans several disciplines which focuses on one aspect of epistemic communities: the way they communicate internally. This research has revealed that a wide number of different communication structures are best, but what is best in a given sit…

  • Computer Simulation and Emergent Reliability in Science

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman, Kevin Zollman•ARTICLE•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2011

    While the popular image of scientists portrays them as objective, dispassionate observers of nature, actual scientists rarely are. It is not really known to what extent these individual departures from the scientific ideal effects the reliability of the scientific community. This paper suggests a number of concrete projects which help to determine this relationship

  • The Independence Thesis

    Open Access•Conor Mayo-Wilson, Conor Mayo‐Wilson et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2011•Cited by: 28•References: 16

    Several philosophers of science have argued that epistemically rational individuals might form epistemically irrational groups and that, conversely, rational groups might be composed of irrational individuals. We call the conjunction of these two claims the Independence Thesis, as they entail that methodological prescriptions for scientific communities and those for individual scientists are logically independent. We defend the inconsistency thes…

  • Social network structure and the achievement of consensus

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman, Kevin JS Zollman•ARTICLE•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2011•Cited by: 9•References: 15

    It is widely believed that bringing parties with differing opinions together to discuss their differences will help both in securing consensus and also in ensuring that this consensus closely approximates the truth. This paper investigates this presumption using two mathematical and computer simulation models. Ultimately, these models show that increased contact can be useful in securing both consensus and truth, but it is not always beneficial i…

  • The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Erkenntnis•2010

  • Evolutionary dynamics of Lewis signaling games

    Open Access•Simon M Huttegger, Brian Skyrms et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2010•Cited by: 18•References: 25

    Transfer of information between senders and receivers, of one kind or another, is essential to all life. David Lewis introduced a game theoretic model of the simplest case, where one sender and one receiver have pure common interest. How hard or easy is it for evolution to achieve information transfer in Lewis signaling?. The answers involve surprising subtleties. We discuss some if these in terms of evolutionary dynamics in both finite and infin…

  • Social structure and the effects of conformity

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Synthese•2010•Cited by: 9•References: 35

  • Evolutionary considerations in the framing of social norms

    Open Access•Brian Skyrms, Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2010•Cited by: 5•References: 4

    In this article, we aim to illustrate evolutionary explanations for the emergence of framing effects, discussed in detail in Cristina Bicchieri’s The Grammar of Society. We show how framing effects might evolve which coalesce two economically distinct interactions into a single one, leading to apparently irrational behavior in each individual interaction. Here we consider the now well-known example of the ultimatum game, and show how this ‘irrati…

  • Explaining fairness in complex environments

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2008•Cited by: 10

    This article presents the evolutionary dynamics of three games: the Nash bargaining game, the ultimatum game, and a hybrid of the two. One might expect that the probability that some behavior evolves in an environment with two games would be near the probability that the same behavior evolves in either game alone. This is not the case for the ultimatum and Nash bargaining games. Fair behavior is more likely to evolve in a combined game than in ei…

  • The Communication Structure of Epistemic Communities

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2007•Cited by: 62•References: 4

    Increasingly, epistemologists are becoming interested in social structures and their effect on epistemic enterprises, but little attention has been paid to the proper distribution of experimental results among scientists. This paper will analyze a model first suggested by two economists, which nicely captures one type of learning situation faced by scientists. The results of a computer simulation study of this model provide two interesting conclu…

  • Talking to Neighbors

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2005•Cited by: 12•References: 2

    In seeking to explain the evolution of social cooperation, many scholars are using increasingly complex game-theoretic models. These complexities often model readily observable features of human and animal populations. In the case of previous games analyzed in the literature, these modifications have had radical effects on the stability and efficiency properties of the models. We will analyze the effect of adding spatial structure to two communic…

  • The Communication Structure of Epistemic Communities

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2007•Cited by: 62•References: 4

    Increasingly, epistemologists are becoming interested in social structures and their effect on epistemic enterprises, but little attention has been paid to the proper distribution of experimental results among scientists. This paper will analyze a model first suggested by two economists, which nicely captures one type of learning situation faced by scientists. The results of a computer simulation study of this model provide two interesting conclu…

  • The Independence Thesis

    Open Access•Conor Mayo-Wilson, Conor Mayo‐Wilson et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2011•Cited by: 28•References: 16

    Several philosophers of science have argued that epistemically rational individuals might form epistemically irrational groups and that, conversely, rational groups might be composed of irrational individuals. We call the conjunction of these two claims the Independence Thesis, as they entail that methodological prescriptions for scientific communities and those for individual scientists are logically independent. We defend the inconsistency thes…

  • Conservatism and the Scientific State of Nature

    Erich Kummerfeld, Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2016•Cited by: 19•References: 9

    Those who comment on modern scientific institutions are often quick to praise institutional structures that leave scientists to their own devices. These comments reveal an underlying presumption that scientists do best when left alone—when they operate in what we call the ‘scientific state of nature’. Through computer simulation, we challenge this presumption by illustrating an inefficiency that arises in the scientific state of nature. This inef…

  • Evolutionary dynamics of Lewis signaling games

    Open Access•Simon M Huttegger, Brian Skyrms et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2010•Cited by: 18•References: 25

    Transfer of information between senders and receivers, of one kind or another, is essential to all life. David Lewis introduced a game theoretic model of the simplest case, where one sender and one receiver have pure common interest. How hard or easy is it for evolution to achieve information transfer in Lewis signaling?. The answers involve surprising subtleties. We discuss some if these in terms of evolutionary dynamics in both finite and infin…

  • Network Epistemology

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2013•Cited by: 13•References: 24

    Much of contemporary knowledge is generated by groups not single individuals. A natural question to ask is, what features make groups better or worse at generating knowledge? This paper surveys research that spans several disciplines which focuses on one aspect of epistemic communities: the way they communicate internally. This research has revealed that a wide number of different communication structures are best, but what is best in a given sit…

  • Talking to Neighbors

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2005•Cited by: 12•References: 2

    In seeking to explain the evolution of social cooperation, many scholars are using increasingly complex game-theoretic models. These complexities often model readily observable features of human and animal populations. In the case of previous games analyzed in the literature, these modifications have had radical effects on the stability and efficiency properties of the models. We will analyze the effect of adding spatial structure to two communic…

  • Explaining fairness in complex environments

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2008•Cited by: 10

    This article presents the evolutionary dynamics of three games: the Nash bargaining game, the ultimatum game, and a hybrid of the two. One might expect that the probability that some behavior evolves in an environment with two games would be near the probability that the same behavior evolves in either game alone. This is not the case for the ultimatum and Nash bargaining games. Fair behavior is more likely to evolve in a combined game than in ei…

  • Social network structure and the achievement of consensus

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman, Kevin JS Zollman•ARTICLE•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2011•Cited by: 9•References: 15

    It is widely believed that bringing parties with differing opinions together to discuss their differences will help both in securing consensus and also in ensuring that this consensus closely approximates the truth. This paper investigates this presumption using two mathematical and computer simulation models. Ultimately, these models show that increased contact can be useful in securing both consensus and truth, but it is not always beneficial i…

  • Social structure and the effects of conformity

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Synthese•2010•Cited by: 9•References: 35

  • The computational philosophy

    Open Access•Conor Mayo-Wilson, J Mevel et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 7•References: 74

    Modeling and computer simulations, we claim, should be considered core philosophical methods. More precisely, we will defend two theses. First, philosophers should use simulations for many of the same reasons we currently use thought experiments. In fact, simulations are superior to thought experiments in achieving some philosophical goals. Second, devising and coding computational models instill good philosophical habits of mind. Throughout the …

  • The Handicap Principle Is an Artifact

    Open Access•Simon M Huttegger, Justin P Bruner et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2015•Cited by: 5•References: 29

    The handicap principle is one of the most influential ideas in evolutionary biology. It asserts that when there is conflict of interest in a signaling interaction signals must be costly in order to be reliable. While in evolutionary biology it is a common practice to distinguish between indexes and fakable signals, we argue this dichotomy is an artifact of existing popular signaling models. Once this distinction is abandoned, we show one cannot a…

  • Methodology in Biological Game Theory

    Simon M Huttegger, Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2013•Cited by: 5•References: 29

    Game theory has a prominent role in evolutionary biology, in particular in the ecological study of various phenomena ranging from conflict behaviour to altruism to signalling and beyond. The two central methodological tools in biological game theory are the concepts of Nash equilibrium and evolutionarily stable strategy. While both were inspired by a dynamic conception of evolution, these concepts are essentially static—they only show that a popu…

  • Evolutionary considerations in the framing of social norms

    Open Access•Brian Skyrms, Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2010•Cited by: 5•References: 4

    In this article, we aim to illustrate evolutionary explanations for the emergence of framing effects, discussed in detail in Cristina Bicchieri’s The Grammar of Society. We show how framing effects might evolve which coalesce two economically distinct interactions into a single one, leading to apparently irrational behavior in each individual interaction. Here we consider the now well-known example of the ultimatum game, and show how this ‘irrati…

  • Explaining costly religious practices

    Open Access•Carl Brusse, Toby Handfield et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2022•Cited by: 1•References: 71

    This paper examines and contrasts two closely related evolutionary explanations in human behaviour: signalling theory, and the theory of Credibility Enhancing Displays (CREDs). Both have been proposed to explain costly, dangerous, or otherwise ‘extravagant’ social behaviours, especially in the context of religious belief and practice, and each have spawned significant lines of empirical research. However, the relationship between these two theore…

  • Signals without teleology

    Open Access•Carl T Bergstrom, Simon M Huttegger et al.•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    Signals" are a conceptual apparatus in many scientific disciplines. Biologists inquire about the evolution of signals, economists talk about the signaling function of purchases and prices, and philosophers discuss the conditions under which signals acquire meaning. However, less attention has been paid to what is a signal. Most existing accounts are teleological in some way. This paper provides a definition of signals that avoids reference to for…

  • Talking to Neighbors

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2005•Cited by: 12•References: 2

    In seeking to explain the evolution of social cooperation, many scholars are using increasingly complex game-theoretic models. These complexities often model readily observable features of human and animal populations. In the case of previous games analyzed in the literature, these modifications have had radical effects on the stability and efficiency properties of the models. We will analyze the effect of adding spatial structure to two communic…

  • The Communication Structure of Epistemic Communities

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2007•Cited by: 62•References: 4

    Increasingly, epistemologists are becoming interested in social structures and their effect on epistemic enterprises, but little attention has been paid to the proper distribution of experimental results among scientists. This paper will analyze a model first suggested by two economists, which nicely captures one type of learning situation faced by scientists. The results of a computer simulation study of this model provide two interesting conclu…

  • Explaining fairness in complex environments

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2008•Cited by: 10

    This article presents the evolutionary dynamics of three games: the Nash bargaining game, the ultimatum game, and a hybrid of the two. One might expect that the probability that some behavior evolves in an environment with two games would be near the probability that the same behavior evolves in either game alone. This is not the case for the ultimatum and Nash bargaining games. Fair behavior is more likely to evolve in a combined game than in ei…

  • The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Erkenntnis•2010

  • Evolutionary dynamics of Lewis signaling games

    Open Access•Simon M Huttegger, Brian Skyrms et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2010•Cited by: 18•References: 25

    Transfer of information between senders and receivers, of one kind or another, is essential to all life. David Lewis introduced a game theoretic model of the simplest case, where one sender and one receiver have pure common interest. How hard or easy is it for evolution to achieve information transfer in Lewis signaling?. The answers involve surprising subtleties. We discuss some if these in terms of evolutionary dynamics in both finite and infin…

  • Social structure and the effects of conformity

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Synthese•2010•Cited by: 9•References: 35

  • Evolutionary considerations in the framing of social norms

    Open Access•Brian Skyrms, Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2010•Cited by: 5•References: 4

    In this article, we aim to illustrate evolutionary explanations for the emergence of framing effects, discussed in detail in Cristina Bicchieri’s The Grammar of Society. We show how framing effects might evolve which coalesce two economically distinct interactions into a single one, leading to apparently irrational behavior in each individual interaction. Here we consider the now well-known example of the ultimatum game, and show how this ‘irrati…

  • Computer Simulation and Emergent Reliability in Science

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman, Kevin Zollman•ARTICLE•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2011

    While the popular image of scientists portrays them as objective, dispassionate observers of nature, actual scientists rarely are. It is not really known to what extent these individual departures from the scientific ideal effects the reliability of the scientific community. This paper suggests a number of concrete projects which help to determine this relationship

  • The Independence Thesis

    Open Access•Conor Mayo-Wilson, Conor Mayo‐Wilson et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2011•Cited by: 28•References: 16

    Several philosophers of science have argued that epistemically rational individuals might form epistemically irrational groups and that, conversely, rational groups might be composed of irrational individuals. We call the conjunction of these two claims the Independence Thesis, as they entail that methodological prescriptions for scientific communities and those for individual scientists are logically independent. We defend the inconsistency thes…

  • Social network structure and the achievement of consensus

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman, Kevin JS Zollman•ARTICLE•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2011•Cited by: 9•References: 15

    It is widely believed that bringing parties with differing opinions together to discuss their differences will help both in securing consensus and also in ensuring that this consensus closely approximates the truth. This paper investigates this presumption using two mathematical and computer simulation models. Ultimately, these models show that increased contact can be useful in securing both consensus and truth, but it is not always beneficial i…

  • Methodology in Biological Game Theory

    Simon M Huttegger, Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2013•Cited by: 5•References: 29

    Game theory has a prominent role in evolutionary biology, in particular in the ecological study of various phenomena ranging from conflict behaviour to altruism to signalling and beyond. The two central methodological tools in biological game theory are the concepts of Nash equilibrium and evolutionarily stable strategy. While both were inspired by a dynamic conception of evolution, these concepts are essentially static—they only show that a popu…

  • Network Epistemology

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2013•Cited by: 13•References: 24

    Much of contemporary knowledge is generated by groups not single individuals. A natural question to ask is, what features make groups better or worse at generating knowledge? This paper surveys research that spans several disciplines which focuses on one aspect of epistemic communities: the way they communicate internally. This research has revealed that a wide number of different communication structures are best, but what is best in a given sit…

  • Introduction, SI of Synthese “The collective dimension of science”

    Open Access•Christophe Imbert, Cyrille Imbert et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2014

  • Dignity and the Value of Rejecting Profitable but Insulting Offers

    E Athanasiou, Alex John London et al.•ARTICLE•Mind•2015

    In this paper we distinguish two competing conceptions of dignity, one recognizably Hobbesian and one recognizably Kantian. We provide a formal model of how decision-makers committed to these conceptions of dignity might reason when engaged in an economic transaction that is not inherently insulting, but in which it is possible for the dignity of the agent to be called into question. This is a modified version of the ultimatum game. We then use t…

  • The Handicap Principle Is an Artifact

    Open Access•Simon M Huttegger, Justin P Bruner et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2015•Cited by: 5•References: 29

    The handicap principle is one of the most influential ideas in evolutionary biology. It asserts that when there is conflict of interest in a signaling interaction signals must be costly in order to be reliable. While in evolutionary biology it is a common practice to distinguish between indexes and fakable signals, we argue this dichotomy is an artifact of existing popular signaling models. Once this distinction is abandoned, we show one cannot a…

  • Conservatism and the Scientific State of Nature

    Erich Kummerfeld, Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2016•Cited by: 19•References: 9

    Those who comment on modern scientific institutions are often quick to praise institutional structures that leave scientists to their own devices. These comments reveal an underlying presumption that scientists do best when left alone—when they operate in what we call the ‘scientific state of nature’. Through computer simulation, we challenge this presumption by illustrating an inefficiency that arises in the scientific state of nature. This inef…

  • Signals without teleology

    Open Access•Carl T Bergstrom, Simon M Huttegger et al.•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    Signals" are a conceptual apparatus in many scientific disciplines. Biologists inquire about the evolution of signals, economists talk about the signaling function of purchases and prices, and philosophers discuss the conditions under which signals acquire meaning. However, less attention has been paid to what is a signal. Most existing accounts are teleological in some way. This paper provides a definition of signals that avoids reference to for…

  • The theory of games as a tool for the social epistemologist

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•ARTICLE•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • The computational philosophy

    Open Access•Conor Mayo-Wilson, J Mevel et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2021•Cited by: 7•References: 74

    Modeling and computer simulations, we claim, should be considered core philosophical methods. More precisely, we will defend two theses. First, philosophers should use simulations for many of the same reasons we currently use thought experiments. In fact, simulations are superior to thought experiments in achieving some philosophical goals. Second, devising and coding computational models instill good philosophical habits of mind. Throughout the …

  • Explaining costly religious practices

    Open Access•Carl Brusse, Toby Handfield et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2022•Cited by: 1•References: 71

    This paper examines and contrasts two closely related evolutionary explanations in human behaviour: signalling theory, and the theory of Credibility Enhancing Displays (CREDs). Both have been proposed to explain costly, dangerous, or otherwise ‘extravagant’ social behaviours, especially in the context of religious belief and practice, and each have spawned significant lines of empirical research. However, the relationship between these two theore…

  • Academic Journals, Incentives, and the Quality of Peer Review

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman, Julian García et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2024

    We model the impact of different incentives on journal behavior in undertaking peer review. Under one scheme, the journal aims to publish the highest-quality papers; under the second, the journal aims to maintain a high rejection rate. Under both schemes, journals prefer to set very high standards for acceptance despite allowing significant error in peer review. Under the second scheme, however, in order to encourage more submissions of mediocre …

  • Reflection, introspection, and book

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman, Kevin Dorst•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2025•References: 7

    The much‐debated Reflection principle states that a coherent agent's credences must match their estimates for their future credences. Defenders claim that there are Dutch‐book arguments in its favor, putting it on the same normative footing as probabilistic coherence. Critics claim that those arguments rely on the implicit, implausible assumption that the agent is introspective : that they are certain what their own credences are. In this paper, …

Epistemology (17 works) · Computer Science (15 works) · Philosophy (15 works) · Sociology (12 works) · Psychology (11 works) · Economics (10 works) · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (10 works) · Game Theory and Applications (10 works) · Mathematics (10 works) · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (8 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae