Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bradley Monton

Biographic Data

ID1087002
NAMEBradley Monton
GIVEN NAMESBradley
FAMILY NAMEMonton
SIGNATUREMONTON B
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Kentucky
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS14
TOTAL CITATIONS84
AUTHOR COUNT14
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1999
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2010
H-INDEX6
  • An Empiricist Regarding Science, an Empiricist Regarding Representation

    Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2010

    It probably goes without saying that the advent of a new book by Bas van Fraassen is a major event in the world of philosophy of science. Indeed, Scientific Representation does not disappoint. It is full of interesting and erudite discussions, and presents controversial arguments with which philosophers of science will want to come to grips. There are two ways in which one could review a book like this. One could just go through it step by step, …

  • Time Travel Without Causal Loops

    Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2009•References: 7

    It has sometimes been suggested that backwards time travel always incurs causal loops. I show that this is mistaken, by describing worlds where backwards time travel occurs and yet no causal loops occur. Arguments that backwards time travel can occur without causal loops have been given before in the literature, but I show that those arguments are unconvincing

  • Quantum Mechanics and 3 N -Dimensional Space

    Open Access•Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2006•Cited by: 16•References: 5

    I maintain that quantum mechanics is fundamentally about a system of N particles evolving in three-dimensional space, not the wave function evolving in 3 N -dimensional space

  • God, Fine-Tuning, and the Problem of Old Evidence

    Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2006•Cited by: 5•References: 10

    The fundamental constants that are involved in the laws of physics which describe our universe are finely tuned for life, in the sense that if some of the constants had slightly different values life could not exist. Some people hold that this provides evidence for the existence of God. I will present a probabilistic version of this fine-tuning argument which is stronger than all other versions in the literature. Nevertheless, I will show that on…

  • How to Predict Future Duration From Present Age

    Bradley Monton, Brian Kierland•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2006•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    The physicist J. Richard Gott has given an argument which, if good, allows one to make accurate predictions for the future longevity of a process, based solely on its present age. We show that there are problems with some of the details of Gott's argument, but we defend the core thesis: in many circumstances, the greater the present age of a process, the more likely a longer future duration

  • Minimizing Inaccuracy for Self-Locating Beliefs

    Open Access•Brian Kierland, Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2005•Cited by: 10•References: 1

    One's inaccuracy for a proposition is defined as the squared difference between the truth value (1 or 0) of the proposition and the credence (or subjective probability, or degree of belief) assigned to the proposition. One should have the epistemic goal of minimizing the expected inaccuracies of one's credences. We show that the method of minimizing expected inaccuracy can be used to solve certain probability problems involving information loss a…

  • The problem of ontology for spontaneous collapse theories

    Open Access•Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2004

  • Constructive Empiricism and Modal Nominalism

    Bradley Monton, Bas C Van Fraassen•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2003•Cited by: 14•References: 12

    James Ladyman has argued that constructive empiricism entails modal realism, and that this renders constructive empiricism untenable. We maintain that constructive empiricism is compatible with modal nominalism. Although the central term ‘observable’ has been analyzed in terms of counterfactuals, and in general counterfactuals do not have objective truth conditions, the property of being observable is not a modal property, and hence there are obj…

  • The Doomsday Argument without Knowledge of Birth Rank

    Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2003•Cited by: 7•References: 6

    Journal Article The Doomsday Argument without Knowledge of Birth Rank Get access Bradley Monton Bradley Monton University of Kentucky Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 53, Issue 210, January 2003, Pages 79-82, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00297 Published: 28 April 2003

  • Wave Function Ontology

    Open Access•Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Synthese•2002•Cited by: 17•References: 5

  • Supererogatory Superluminality

    Open Access•Bradley Monton, Brian Kierland•ARTICLE•Synthese•2001•Cited by: 1•References: 12

  • Counting Marbles with 'Accessible' Mass Density: A Reply to Bassi and Ghirardi

    Rebecca G Clifton, R Clifton et al.•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2000•Cited by: 7

    In a previous article (cf. quant-ph/9905065) we argued that, while Lewis is correct that the enumeration principle fails in dynamical wavepacket reduction theories, one need not following Lewis in rejecting these theories. Because the dynamical reduction process itself prevents the failure of enumeration from ever becoming manifest, and because one can treat the semantics for dynamical reduction theories as not adding anything of ontological impo…

  • Van Fraassen and Ruetsche on Preparation and Measurement

    Open Access•Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1999•Cited by: 1•References: 4

    Ruetsche (1996) has argued that van Fraassen's (1991) Copenhagen Variant of the Modal Interpretation (CVMI) gives unsatisfactory accounts of measurement and of state preparation. I defend the CVMI against Ruetsche's first argument by using decoherence to show that the CVMI does not need to account for the measurement scenario which Ruetsche poses. I then show, however, that there is a problem concerning preparation, and the problem is more seriou…

  • Losing Your Marbles in Wavefunction Collapse Theories

    Rob Clifton, Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1999•Cited by: 5•References: 9

    Peter Lewis ([1997]) has recently argued that the wavefunction collapse theory of GRW (Chirardi, Rimini and Weber [1986]) can only solve the problem of wavefunction tails at the expense of predicting that arithmetic does not apply to ordinary macroscopic objects. More specifically, Lewis argues that the GRW theory must violate the enumeration principle: that 'if marble 1 is in the box and marble 2 is in the box and so on through marble n, then al…

  • Wave Function Ontology

    Open Access•Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Synthese•2002•Cited by: 17•References: 5

  • Quantum Mechanics and 3 N -Dimensional Space

    Open Access•Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2006•Cited by: 16•References: 5

    I maintain that quantum mechanics is fundamentally about a system of N particles evolving in three-dimensional space, not the wave function evolving in 3 N -dimensional space

  • Constructive Empiricism and Modal Nominalism

    Bradley Monton, Bas C Van Fraassen•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2003•Cited by: 14•References: 12

    James Ladyman has argued that constructive empiricism entails modal realism, and that this renders constructive empiricism untenable. We maintain that constructive empiricism is compatible with modal nominalism. Although the central term ‘observable’ has been analyzed in terms of counterfactuals, and in general counterfactuals do not have objective truth conditions, the property of being observable is not a modal property, and hence there are obj…

  • Minimizing Inaccuracy for Self-Locating Beliefs

    Open Access•Brian Kierland, Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2005•Cited by: 10•References: 1

    One's inaccuracy for a proposition is defined as the squared difference between the truth value (1 or 0) of the proposition and the credence (or subjective probability, or degree of belief) assigned to the proposition. One should have the epistemic goal of minimizing the expected inaccuracies of one's credences. We show that the method of minimizing expected inaccuracy can be used to solve certain probability problems involving information loss a…

  • The Doomsday Argument without Knowledge of Birth Rank

    Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2003•Cited by: 7•References: 6

    Journal Article The Doomsday Argument without Knowledge of Birth Rank Get access Bradley Monton Bradley Monton University of Kentucky Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 53, Issue 210, January 2003, Pages 79-82, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00297 Published: 28 April 2003

  • Counting Marbles with 'Accessible' Mass Density: A Reply to Bassi and Ghirardi

    Rebecca G Clifton, R Clifton et al.•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2000•Cited by: 7

    In a previous article (cf. quant-ph/9905065) we argued that, while Lewis is correct that the enumeration principle fails in dynamical wavepacket reduction theories, one need not following Lewis in rejecting these theories. Because the dynamical reduction process itself prevents the failure of enumeration from ever becoming manifest, and because one can treat the semantics for dynamical reduction theories as not adding anything of ontological impo…

  • God, Fine-Tuning, and the Problem of Old Evidence

    Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2006•Cited by: 5•References: 10

    The fundamental constants that are involved in the laws of physics which describe our universe are finely tuned for life, in the sense that if some of the constants had slightly different values life could not exist. Some people hold that this provides evidence for the existence of God. I will present a probabilistic version of this fine-tuning argument which is stronger than all other versions in the literature. Nevertheless, I will show that on…

  • Losing Your Marbles in Wavefunction Collapse Theories

    Rob Clifton, Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1999•Cited by: 5•References: 9

    Peter Lewis ([1997]) has recently argued that the wavefunction collapse theory of GRW (Chirardi, Rimini and Weber [1986]) can only solve the problem of wavefunction tails at the expense of predicting that arithmetic does not apply to ordinary macroscopic objects. More specifically, Lewis argues that the GRW theory must violate the enumeration principle: that 'if marble 1 is in the box and marble 2 is in the box and so on through marble n, then al…

  • How to Predict Future Duration From Present Age

    Bradley Monton, Brian Kierland•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2006•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    The physicist J. Richard Gott has given an argument which, if good, allows one to make accurate predictions for the future longevity of a process, based solely on its present age. We show that there are problems with some of the details of Gott's argument, but we defend the core thesis: in many circumstances, the greater the present age of a process, the more likely a longer future duration

  • Supererogatory Superluminality

    Open Access•Bradley Monton, Brian Kierland•ARTICLE•Synthese•2001•Cited by: 1•References: 12

  • Van Fraassen and Ruetsche on Preparation and Measurement

    Open Access•Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1999•Cited by: 1•References: 4

    Ruetsche (1996) has argued that van Fraassen's (1991) Copenhagen Variant of the Modal Interpretation (CVMI) gives unsatisfactory accounts of measurement and of state preparation. I defend the CVMI against Ruetsche's first argument by using decoherence to show that the CVMI does not need to account for the measurement scenario which Ruetsche poses. I then show, however, that there is a problem concerning preparation, and the problem is more seriou…

  • Van Fraassen and Ruetsche on Preparation and Measurement

    Open Access•Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1999•Cited by: 1•References: 4

    Ruetsche (1996) has argued that van Fraassen's (1991) Copenhagen Variant of the Modal Interpretation (CVMI) gives unsatisfactory accounts of measurement and of state preparation. I defend the CVMI against Ruetsche's first argument by using decoherence to show that the CVMI does not need to account for the measurement scenario which Ruetsche poses. I then show, however, that there is a problem concerning preparation, and the problem is more seriou…

  • Losing Your Marbles in Wavefunction Collapse Theories

    Rob Clifton, Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1999•Cited by: 5•References: 9

    Peter Lewis ([1997]) has recently argued that the wavefunction collapse theory of GRW (Chirardi, Rimini and Weber [1986]) can only solve the problem of wavefunction tails at the expense of predicting that arithmetic does not apply to ordinary macroscopic objects. More specifically, Lewis argues that the GRW theory must violate the enumeration principle: that 'if marble 1 is in the box and marble 2 is in the box and so on through marble n, then al…

  • Counting Marbles with 'Accessible' Mass Density: A Reply to Bassi and Ghirardi

    Rebecca G Clifton, R Clifton et al.•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2000•Cited by: 7

    In a previous article (cf. quant-ph/9905065) we argued that, while Lewis is correct that the enumeration principle fails in dynamical wavepacket reduction theories, one need not following Lewis in rejecting these theories. Because the dynamical reduction process itself prevents the failure of enumeration from ever becoming manifest, and because one can treat the semantics for dynamical reduction theories as not adding anything of ontological impo…

  • Supererogatory Superluminality

    Open Access•Bradley Monton, Brian Kierland•ARTICLE•Synthese•2001•Cited by: 1•References: 12

  • Wave Function Ontology

    Open Access•Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Synthese•2002•Cited by: 17•References: 5

  • Constructive Empiricism and Modal Nominalism

    Bradley Monton, Bas C Van Fraassen•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2003•Cited by: 14•References: 12

    James Ladyman has argued that constructive empiricism entails modal realism, and that this renders constructive empiricism untenable. We maintain that constructive empiricism is compatible with modal nominalism. Although the central term ‘observable’ has been analyzed in terms of counterfactuals, and in general counterfactuals do not have objective truth conditions, the property of being observable is not a modal property, and hence there are obj…

  • The Doomsday Argument without Knowledge of Birth Rank

    Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2003•Cited by: 7•References: 6

    Journal Article The Doomsday Argument without Knowledge of Birth Rank Get access Bradley Monton Bradley Monton University of Kentucky Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 53, Issue 210, January 2003, Pages 79-82, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00297 Published: 28 April 2003

  • The problem of ontology for spontaneous collapse theories

    Open Access•Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2004

  • Minimizing Inaccuracy for Self-Locating Beliefs

    Open Access•Brian Kierland, Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2005•Cited by: 10•References: 1

    One's inaccuracy for a proposition is defined as the squared difference between the truth value (1 or 0) of the proposition and the credence (or subjective probability, or degree of belief) assigned to the proposition. One should have the epistemic goal of minimizing the expected inaccuracies of one's credences. We show that the method of minimizing expected inaccuracy can be used to solve certain probability problems involving information loss a…

  • Quantum Mechanics and 3 N -Dimensional Space

    Open Access•Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2006•Cited by: 16•References: 5

    I maintain that quantum mechanics is fundamentally about a system of N particles evolving in three-dimensional space, not the wave function evolving in 3 N -dimensional space

  • God, Fine-Tuning, and the Problem of Old Evidence

    Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2006•Cited by: 5•References: 10

    The fundamental constants that are involved in the laws of physics which describe our universe are finely tuned for life, in the sense that if some of the constants had slightly different values life could not exist. Some people hold that this provides evidence for the existence of God. I will present a probabilistic version of this fine-tuning argument which is stronger than all other versions in the literature. Nevertheless, I will show that on…

  • How to Predict Future Duration From Present Age

    Bradley Monton, Brian Kierland•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2006•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    The physicist J. Richard Gott has given an argument which, if good, allows one to make accurate predictions for the future longevity of a process, based solely on its present age. We show that there are problems with some of the details of Gott's argument, but we defend the core thesis: in many circumstances, the greater the present age of a process, the more likely a longer future duration

  • Time Travel Without Causal Loops

    Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2009•References: 7

    It has sometimes been suggested that backwards time travel always incurs causal loops. I show that this is mistaken, by describing worlds where backwards time travel occurs and yet no causal loops occur. Arguments that backwards time travel can occur without causal loops have been given before in the literature, but I show that those arguments are unconvincing

  • An Empiricist Regarding Science, an Empiricist Regarding Representation

    Bradley Monton•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2010

    It probably goes without saying that the advent of a new book by Bas van Fraassen is a major event in the world of philosophy of science. Indeed, Scientific Representation does not disappoint. It is full of interesting and erudite discussions, and presents controversial arguments with which philosophers of science will want to come to grips. There are two ways in which one could review a book like this. One could just go through it step by step, …

Computer Science (11 works) · Philosophy (11 works) · Epistemology (10 works) · Physics (10 works) · Quantum Mechanics and Applications (9 works) · Mathematics (8 works) · Theoretical physics (6 works) · Argument (complex analysis) (5 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (5 works) · Quantum mechanics (5 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae