Javier Gomez‐lavin
Biographic Data
| ID | 1102364 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Javier Gomez‐lavin |
| GIVEN NAMES | Javier |
| FAMILY NAME | Gomez‐lavin |
| SIGNATURE | LAVIN J G |
| AFFILIATIONS | California University of Pennsylvania |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0476-8290 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 6 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Response to LÖhr: Why We Still Need a New Normativism
Guido Löhr's recent article makes several insightful and productive suggestions about how to proceed with the empirical study of collective action. However, their critique of the conclusions drawn in Gomez-Lavin & Rachar (2022) is undermined by some issues with the interpretation of the debate and paper. This discussion article clears up those issues, presents new findings from experiments developed in response to Löhr's critiques, reflects on th…
Why We Need a New Normativism about Collective Action
What do we owe each other when we act together? According to normativists about collective action, necessarily something and potentially quite a bit. They contend that collective action inherently involves a special normative status amongst participants, which may, for example, involve mutual obligations to receive the concurrence of the others before leaving. We build on recent empirical work whose results lend plausibility to a normativist acco…
Working memory is not a natural kind and cannot explain central cognition
Why We Need a New Normativism about Collective Action
What do we owe each other when we act together? According to normativists about collective action, necessarily something and potentially quite a bit. They contend that collective action inherently involves a special normative status amongst participants, which may, for example, involve mutual obligations to receive the concurrence of the others before leaving. We build on recent empirical work whose results lend plausibility to a normativist acco…
Response to LÖhr: Why We Still Need a New Normativism
Guido Löhr's recent article makes several insightful and productive suggestions about how to proceed with the empirical study of collective action. However, their critique of the conclusions drawn in Gomez-Lavin & Rachar (2022) is undermined by some issues with the interpretation of the debate and paper. This discussion article clears up those issues, presents new findings from experiments developed in response to Löhr's critiques, reflects on th…
Working memory is not a natural kind and cannot explain central cognition
Why We Need a New Normativism about Collective Action
What do we owe each other when we act together? According to normativists about collective action, necessarily something and potentially quite a bit. They contend that collective action inherently involves a special normative status amongst participants, which may, for example, involve mutual obligations to receive the concurrence of the others before leaving. We build on recent empirical work whose results lend plausibility to a normativist acco…
Response to LÖhr: Why We Still Need a New Normativism
Guido Löhr's recent article makes several insightful and productive suggestions about how to proceed with the empirical study of collective action. However, their critique of the conclusions drawn in Gomez-Lavin & Rachar (2022) is undermined by some issues with the interpretation of the debate and paper. This discussion article clears up those issues, presents new findings from experiments developed in response to Löhr's critiques, reflects on th…
Action (physics (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Free Will and Agency (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Cognition (1 works) · Cognitive psychology (1 works)