Response to LÖhr
Why We Still Need a New Normativism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7412947 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Javier Gomez‐lavin (0000-0002-0476-8290, Purdue University West Lafayette), Javier Gomez-Lavin (Purdue University , USA), Matthew Rachar (0000-0002-8187-7327, Douglas College) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1067-1076 |
| Publication date | 2023-04-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/pq/pqad047 |
| OpenAlex | W4366332519 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 8 |
Guido Löhr's recent article makes several insightful and productive suggestions about how to proceed with the empirical study of collective action. However, their critique of the conclusions drawn in Gomez-Lavin & Rachar (2022) is undermined by some issues with the interpretation of the debate and paper. This discussion article clears up those issues, presents new findings from experiments developed in response to Löhr's critiques, reflects on the role of experimental research in the development and refinement of philosophical theories, and adds to Löhr's suggestions about the path forward
Action (physics · Economics · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Positive economics · Sociology · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Free Will and Agency · Philosophy · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |