Peter Bannister
Biographic Data
| ID | 1138687 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Peter Bannister |
| GIVEN NAMES | Peter |
| FAMILY NAME | Bannister |
| SIGNATURE | BANNISTER P |
| AFFILIATIONS | Universidad Internacional De La Rioja |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7216-3912 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
ParadAIse L0st
This paper explores the relationship between mind and machine at the intersection of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and research writing in Higher Education. Through provocative stylistic resistance, the focus here shifts from what GenAI can or cannot produce to the paradoxical human behaviours in response, for instance, the mechanical predictability of narrative arcs prevalent in contemporary GenAI-related scholarship, whether human-…
‘AI lost the prompt!’ Replacing ‘AI hallucination’ to distinguish between mere errors and irregularities
One of the principal areas of current AI research concerns what are termed “hallucinations”. Whilst hundreds of different definitions and classifications of “AI hallucination” have been published, none have yet considered the distinction between errors and irregularities in Wittgenstein’s sense. This article provides a straightforward explanation of this distinction, illustrated through examples of AI outputs drawn from various publications. We t…
Exploring Legitimation Code Theory and TikTok
This exploratory study employs Legitimation Code Theory (LCT), a theoretical framework for analysing knowledge practices across disciplinary and social contexts, to elucidate the construction and legitimisation of financial knowledge on TikTok, a platform witnessing a surge in informal financial literacy education. A meticulously curated multimodal corpus of financial influencer (‘finfluencer’) videos (n=100; 50 English, 50 Spanish) underwent rig…
Validating the Pandora GenAI Susceptibility Rubric for Higher Education Assessment
This study, conducted at a fully online Spanish higher education institution, documents the validation of a bespoke quality assessment tool designed to measure the susceptibility of formative assignments to AI academic misconduct. The research explored the impact of Generative AI (GenAI) technologies in the Humanities. The framework study consisted of four stages: the design of a rubric (Stages 1–3) and its large‐scale validation (Stage 4) throug…
On the essay in a time of GenAI
On the essay in a time of GenAI
Transnational higher education cultures and generative AI
Purpose This purpose of this paper is to report on the development of an evidence-informed framework created to facilitate the formulation of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) academic integrity policy responses for English medium instruction (EMI) higher education, responding to both the bespoke challenges for the sector and longstanding calls to define and disseminate quality implementation good practice. Design/methodology/approach A …
Results Speak for Themselves
The author has undertaken a narrative inquiry that explores the political and cultural positioning of drama education in the English secondary school. The inquiry also serves as both an experiment in and an argument for the relevance of a storying methodology in educational research. The reader is encouraged through the employment of particular expressionistic features, borrowed from the poetic mode, to enter into reflective conversation with the…
The Offence of Beauty in Modern Western Art Music
In recent decades, beauty has become a largely unfashionable, even offensive notion within art and philosophy. As Eastern Orthodox theologian, David Bentley Hart, has pointed out, this offence has a twofold sense. Firstly, the 'beautiful' has been dismissed as philosophically insignificant in comparison to the 'sublime' by an intellectual tradition tracing itself back to Immanuel Kant's Critique of Judgment. Secondly, the making of apparently bea…
Transnational higher education cultures and generative AI
Purpose This purpose of this paper is to report on the development of an evidence-informed framework created to facilitate the formulation of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) academic integrity policy responses for English medium instruction (EMI) higher education, responding to both the bespoke challenges for the sector and longstanding calls to define and disseminate quality implementation good practice. Design/methodology/approach A …
Results Speak for Themselves
The author has undertaken a narrative inquiry that explores the political and cultural positioning of drama education in the English secondary school. The inquiry also serves as both an experiment in and an argument for the relevance of a storying methodology in educational research. The reader is encouraged through the employment of particular expressionistic features, borrowed from the poetic mode, to enter into reflective conversation with the…
The Offence of Beauty in Modern Western Art Music
In recent decades, beauty has become a largely unfashionable, even offensive notion within art and philosophy. As Eastern Orthodox theologian, David Bentley Hart, has pointed out, this offence has a twofold sense. Firstly, the 'beautiful' has been dismissed as philosophically insignificant in comparison to the 'sublime' by an intellectual tradition tracing itself back to Immanuel Kant's Critique of Judgment. Secondly, the making of apparently bea…
Transnational higher education cultures and generative AI
Purpose This purpose of this paper is to report on the development of an evidence-informed framework created to facilitate the formulation of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) academic integrity policy responses for English medium instruction (EMI) higher education, responding to both the bespoke challenges for the sector and longstanding calls to define and disseminate quality implementation good practice. Design/methodology/approach A …
Validating the Pandora GenAI Susceptibility Rubric for Higher Education Assessment
This study, conducted at a fully online Spanish higher education institution, documents the validation of a bespoke quality assessment tool designed to measure the susceptibility of formative assignments to AI academic misconduct. The research explored the impact of Generative AI (GenAI) technologies in the Humanities. The framework study consisted of four stages: the design of a rubric (Stages 1–3) and its large‐scale validation (Stage 4) throug…
On the essay in a time of GenAI
On the essay in a time of GenAI
ParadAIse L0st
This paper explores the relationship between mind and machine at the intersection of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and research writing in Higher Education. Through provocative stylistic resistance, the focus here shifts from what GenAI can or cannot produce to the paradoxical human behaviours in response, for instance, the mechanical predictability of narrative arcs prevalent in contemporary GenAI-related scholarship, whether human-…
‘AI lost the prompt!’ Replacing ‘AI hallucination’ to distinguish between mere errors and irregularities
One of the principal areas of current AI research concerns what are termed “hallucinations”. Whilst hundreds of different definitions and classifications of “AI hallucination” have been published, none have yet considered the distinction between errors and irregularities in Wittgenstein’s sense. This article provides a straightforward explanation of this distinction, illustrated through examples of AI outputs drawn from various publications. We t…
Exploring Legitimation Code Theory and TikTok
This exploratory study employs Legitimation Code Theory (LCT), a theoretical framework for analysing knowledge practices across disciplinary and social contexts, to elucidate the construction and legitimisation of financial knowledge on TikTok, a platform witnessing a surge in informal financial literacy education. A meticulously curated multimodal corpus of financial influencer (‘finfluencer’) videos (n=100; 50 English, 50 Spanish) underwent rig…
Sociology (3 works) · Art (2 works) · Literature (2 works) · Narrative (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Student Assessment and Feedback (2 works) · Academic integrity and plagiarism (1 work) · Accountability (1 work) · Acknowledgement (1 work)