Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Stefan Napel

Datos Biográficos

ID1152779
NOMBREStefan Napel
NOMBRESStefan
APELLIDONapel
FIRMANAPEL S
AFILIACIONESUniversity of Bayreuth
ORCID0000-0002-7116-6441
VERIFICADOSí
TOTAL DE OBRAS9
TOTAL DE CITAS34
TOTAL COMO AUTOR9
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN2004
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2022
ÍNDICE H4
  • Relative Responsibility for Cartel Damages

    Stefan Napel, Dominik Welter•ARTICLE•Journal of Institutional and…•2022

    Cartel members are liable jointly and severally: any infringing firm may be litigated and forced to compensate victims on behalf of all members. EU law stipulates that co-infringers must pay internal redress in proportion to »relative responsibility for the harm caused.« We suggest to quantify this by invoking basic proportioning axioms and requiring that redress payments reflect causal links between actions and damages. This calls for applicatio…

  • Welfare rationales for conditionality of cash transfers

    Open Access•Dilip Mookherjee, Stefan Napel•ARTICLE•Journal of Development Economics•2021•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 7

  • On the Democratic Weights of Nations

    Sascha Kurz, Nicola Maaser et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Economy•2017•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 8

    Which voting weights ought to be allocated to single delegates of differently sized groups from a democratic fairness perspective? We operationalize the one person, one vote principle by demanding every individual's influence on collective decisions to be equal a priori. The analysis differs from previous ones by considering intervals of alternatives. New reasons lead to an old conclusion: weights should be proportional to the square root of cons…

  • Monotonicity of power in weighted voting games with restricted communication

    Open Access•Stefan Napel, Andreas Nohn et al.•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2012•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 31

  • A note on the direct democracy deficit in two-tier voting

    Open Access•Nicola Maaser, Stefan Napel•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2012•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 18

  • The European Commission–Appointment, preferences, and institutional relations

    Open Access•Stefan Napel, Mika Widgrèn•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2008•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 22

  • Inequality Aversion in a Variety of Games – An Indirect Evolutionary Analysis

    Open Access•Werner Güth, Stefan Napel•ARTICLE•The Economic Journal•2006•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 21

    The indirect evolutionary approach integrates forward-looking evaluation of opportunities and adaptation in the light of the past. Subjective motivation determines behaviour, but long-run evolutionary success of motivational types depends on objective factors only. This can justify intrinsic aversion to inequality in reward allocation games. Whereas earlier analysis was restricted to specific games, this article considers a more complex environme…

  • The Possibility of a Preference-Based Power Index

    Open Access•Stefan Napel, Mika Widgrèn•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2005•Citada por: 6•Referencias: 10

    This article replies to the claim that preference-based power indices are impossible and that preferences should be ignored when assessing actors’ influence in different interactions (Braham and Holler [2005] ‘The Impossibility of a Preference-based Power Index’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 17: 137-57). The article argues that preferences are an important determinant of potential and actual outcomes of social interaction and thereby a valuabl…

  • Power Measurement as Sensitivity Analysis

    Open Access•Stefan Napel, Mika Widgrèn•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2004•Citada por: 13•Referencias: 43

    This paper proposes a unified framework that integrates the traditional index-based approach and the competing non-cooperative approach to power analysis. It rests on a quantifiable notion of ex post power as the (counter-factual) sensitivity of the expected or observed outcome to individual players. Thus, it formalizes players’ marginal impact on outcomes in both cooperative and non-cooperative games, for both strategic interaction as well as pu…

  • Power Measurement as Sensitivity Analysis

    Open Access•Stefan Napel, Mika Widgrèn•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2004•Citada por: 13•Referencias: 43

    This paper proposes a unified framework that integrates the traditional index-based approach and the competing non-cooperative approach to power analysis. It rests on a quantifiable notion of ex post power as the (counter-factual) sensitivity of the expected or observed outcome to individual players. Thus, it formalizes players’ marginal impact on outcomes in both cooperative and non-cooperative games, for both strategic interaction as well as pu…

  • The Possibility of a Preference-Based Power Index

    Open Access•Stefan Napel, Mika Widgrèn•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2005•Citada por: 6•Referencias: 10

    This article replies to the claim that preference-based power indices are impossible and that preferences should be ignored when assessing actors’ influence in different interactions (Braham and Holler [2005] ‘The Impossibility of a Preference-based Power Index’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 17: 137-57). The article argues that preferences are an important determinant of potential and actual outcomes of social interaction and thereby a valuabl…

  • On the Democratic Weights of Nations

    Sascha Kurz, Nicola Maaser et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Economy•2017•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 8

    Which voting weights ought to be allocated to single delegates of differently sized groups from a democratic fairness perspective? We operationalize the one person, one vote principle by demanding every individual's influence on collective decisions to be equal a priori. The analysis differs from previous ones by considering intervals of alternatives. New reasons lead to an old conclusion: weights should be proportional to the square root of cons…

  • Inequality Aversion in a Variety of Games – An Indirect Evolutionary Analysis

    Open Access•Werner Güth, Stefan Napel•ARTICLE•The Economic Journal•2006•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 21

    The indirect evolutionary approach integrates forward-looking evaluation of opportunities and adaptation in the light of the past. Subjective motivation determines behaviour, but long-run evolutionary success of motivational types depends on objective factors only. This can justify intrinsic aversion to inequality in reward allocation games. Whereas earlier analysis was restricted to specific games, this article considers a more complex environme…

  • Welfare rationales for conditionality of cash transfers

    Open Access•Dilip Mookherjee, Stefan Napel•ARTICLE•Journal of Development Economics•2021•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 7

  • A note on the direct democracy deficit in two-tier voting

    Open Access•Nicola Maaser, Stefan Napel•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2012•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 18

  • The European Commission–Appointment, preferences, and institutional relations

    Open Access•Stefan Napel, Mika Widgrèn•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2008•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 22

  • Monotonicity of power in weighted voting games with restricted communication

    Open Access•Stefan Napel, Andreas Nohn et al.•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2012•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 31

  • Power Measurement as Sensitivity Analysis

    Open Access•Stefan Napel, Mika Widgrèn•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2004•Citada por: 13•Referencias: 43

    This paper proposes a unified framework that integrates the traditional index-based approach and the competing non-cooperative approach to power analysis. It rests on a quantifiable notion of ex post power as the (counter-factual) sensitivity of the expected or observed outcome to individual players. Thus, it formalizes players’ marginal impact on outcomes in both cooperative and non-cooperative games, for both strategic interaction as well as pu…

  • The Possibility of a Preference-Based Power Index

    Open Access•Stefan Napel, Mika Widgrèn•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2005•Citada por: 6•Referencias: 10

    This article replies to the claim that preference-based power indices are impossible and that preferences should be ignored when assessing actors’ influence in different interactions (Braham and Holler [2005] ‘The Impossibility of a Preference-based Power Index’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 17: 137-57). The article argues that preferences are an important determinant of potential and actual outcomes of social interaction and thereby a valuabl…

  • Inequality Aversion in a Variety of Games – An Indirect Evolutionary Analysis

    Open Access•Werner Güth, Stefan Napel•ARTICLE•The Economic Journal•2006•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 21

    The indirect evolutionary approach integrates forward-looking evaluation of opportunities and adaptation in the light of the past. Subjective motivation determines behaviour, but long-run evolutionary success of motivational types depends on objective factors only. This can justify intrinsic aversion to inequality in reward allocation games. Whereas earlier analysis was restricted to specific games, this article considers a more complex environme…

  • The European Commission–Appointment, preferences, and institutional relations

    Open Access•Stefan Napel, Mika Widgrèn•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2008•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 22

  • Monotonicity of power in weighted voting games with restricted communication

    Open Access•Stefan Napel, Andreas Nohn et al.•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2012•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 31

  • A note on the direct democracy deficit in two-tier voting

    Open Access•Nicola Maaser, Stefan Napel•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•2012•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 18

  • On the Democratic Weights of Nations

    Sascha Kurz, Nicola Maaser et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Political Economy•2017•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 8

    Which voting weights ought to be allocated to single delegates of differently sized groups from a democratic fairness perspective? We operationalize the one person, one vote principle by demanding every individual's influence on collective decisions to be equal a priori. The analysis differs from previous ones by considering intervals of alternatives. New reasons lead to an old conclusion: weights should be proportional to the square root of cons…

  • Welfare rationales for conditionality of cash transfers

    Open Access•Dilip Mookherjee, Stefan Napel•ARTICLE•Journal of Development Economics•2021•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 7

  • Relative Responsibility for Cartel Damages

    Stefan Napel, Dominik Welter•ARTICLE•Journal of Institutional and…•2022

    Cartel members are liable jointly and severally: any infringing firm may be litigated and forced to compensate victims on behalf of all members. EU law stipulates that co-infringers must pay internal redress in proportion to »relative responsibility for the harm caused.« We suggest to quantify this by invoking basic proportioning axioms and requiring that redress payments reflect causal links between actions and damages. This calls for applicatio…

Economics (8 obras) · Mathematical economics (6 obras) · Microeconomics (6 obras) · Political science (6 obras) · Computer Science (5 obras) · Law (5 obras) · Game Theory and Voting Systems (4 obras) · Law (4 obras) · Mathematics (4 obras) · Politics (4 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae