Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

R Keith Aufhauser

Biographic Data

ID1168258
NAMER Keith Aufhauser
GIVEN NAMESR Keith
FAMILY NAMEAufhauser
SIGNATUREAUFHAUSER R K
AFFILIATIONSQueens College, CUNY
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS22
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1973
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1974
H-INDEX3
  • Slavery and Technological Change

    Open Access•R Keith Aufhauser•ARTICLE•The Journal of Economic History•1974•Cited by: 4•References: 5

    Much of the confusion in the debate on slavery and technology derives from the belief that identifies technological change with progress. Not only the Awkwrights and Seniors thought this way; Marx and, from what I have heard from my colleagues at this conference, a fair proportion of economic historians maintain that the salvation of society depends upon changes in the techniques of production

  • Profitability of Slavery in the British Caribbean

    R Keith Aufhauser•ARTICLE•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1974•Cited by: 4

    Profitability of Slavery in the British Caribbean No one today argues that free labor is an unremunerative economic system. But there are many scholars who claim that the system of slave labor was losing money in the years just preceding its abolition. This article demonstrates the profitability of slavery in the nineteenth-century sugar business. We will show that you cannot bury slavery by praising the superior profitability of free labor regim…

  • Slavery and Scientific Management

    Open Access•R Keith Aufhauser•ARTICLE•The Journal of Economic History•1973•Cited by: 14

    In the last few years, the controversy over the economic history of slavery has centered about two positions. On the one hand, Genovese has argued that the slave mode of production was fundamentally antagonistic to the bourgeois mode and that the conflicts between the two systems doomed slavery to a nineteenth-century grave. On the other hand, Conrad and Meyer spawned many studies which, on the whole, denied that any specifically economic difficu…

  • Slavery and Scientific Management

    Open Access•R Keith Aufhauser•ARTICLE•The Journal of Economic History•1973•Cited by: 14

    In the last few years, the controversy over the economic history of slavery has centered about two positions. On the one hand, Genovese has argued that the slave mode of production was fundamentally antagonistic to the bourgeois mode and that the conflicts between the two systems doomed slavery to a nineteenth-century grave. On the other hand, Conrad and Meyer spawned many studies which, on the whole, denied that any specifically economic difficu…

  • Slavery and Technological Change

    Open Access•R Keith Aufhauser•ARTICLE•The Journal of Economic History•1974•Cited by: 4•References: 5

    Much of the confusion in the debate on slavery and technology derives from the belief that identifies technological change with progress. Not only the Awkwrights and Seniors thought this way; Marx and, from what I have heard from my colleagues at this conference, a fair proportion of economic historians maintain that the salvation of society depends upon changes in the techniques of production

  • Profitability of Slavery in the British Caribbean

    R Keith Aufhauser•ARTICLE•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1974•Cited by: 4

    Profitability of Slavery in the British Caribbean No one today argues that free labor is an unremunerative economic system. But there are many scholars who claim that the system of slave labor was losing money in the years just preceding its abolition. This article demonstrates the profitability of slavery in the nineteenth-century sugar business. We will show that you cannot bury slavery by praising the superior profitability of free labor regim…

  • Slavery and Scientific Management

    Open Access•R Keith Aufhauser•ARTICLE•The Journal of Economic History•1973•Cited by: 14

    In the last few years, the controversy over the economic history of slavery has centered about two positions. On the one hand, Genovese has argued that the slave mode of production was fundamentally antagonistic to the bourgeois mode and that the conflicts between the two systems doomed slavery to a nineteenth-century grave. On the other hand, Conrad and Meyer spawned many studies which, on the whole, denied that any specifically economic difficu…

  • Slavery and Technological Change

    Open Access•R Keith Aufhauser•ARTICLE•The Journal of Economic History•1974•Cited by: 4•References: 5

    Much of the confusion in the debate on slavery and technology derives from the belief that identifies technological change with progress. Not only the Awkwrights and Seniors thought this way; Marx and, from what I have heard from my colleagues at this conference, a fair proportion of economic historians maintain that the salvation of society depends upon changes in the techniques of production

  • Profitability of Slavery in the British Caribbean

    R Keith Aufhauser•ARTICLE•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1974•Cited by: 4

    Profitability of Slavery in the British Caribbean No one today argues that free labor is an unremunerative economic system. But there are many scholars who claim that the system of slave labor was losing money in the years just preceding its abolition. This article demonstrates the profitability of slavery in the nineteenth-century sugar business. We will show that you cannot bury slavery by praising the superior profitability of free labor regim…

Economics (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 works) · Macroeconomics (2 works) · Neoclassical economics (2 works) · Aesthetics (1 works) · Art (1 works) · Bourgeoisie (1 works) · Business (1 works) · Caribbean history, culture, and politics (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae