Irena Vassileva
Biographic Data
| ID | 1174852 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Irena Vassileva |
| GIVEN NAMES | Irena |
| FAMILY NAME | Vassileva |
| SIGNATURE | VASSILEVA I |
| AFFILIATIONS | New Bulgarian University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0150-6375 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 14 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1995 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
GenAI and Authorship in Academia
Amid vivid ethical discussions on using AI to assist scholars in the writing process, this contribution tackles the question about Generative AI and authorship from a philosophy of language and academic perspective. In this integrative review, we look into the ways Generative AI impacts the very notion of authorship on the stages of knowledge production, knowledge consumption and knowledge dissemination. We focus on the implications of using Larg…
An ‘academic war’ – A case study of confrontation in academia
Co-evolving academic rhetoric across culture; Britain, Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany in the 20th century
Who am I/who are we in academic writing?L
One of the conspicuous differences infacademic discourse presentation is the preference for use of the first person singular ‘I’ perspective in some languages versus the first person plural ‘we’ perspective in others. This distinction is due not so much to purely linguistic reasons as to cultural ones. The purpose of this paper is to present some data concerning the employment of the two perspectives in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgar…
Some aspects of the rhetorical structure of specialized written discourse in English, Bulgarian and Russian
The paper focuses on the similarities and differences between the rhetorical structure of some Slavonic (Russian and Bulgarian) and English scientific texts. The aim of the study is to test the widely accepted assumption that scientific discourse has universal features which are language‐independent. The analysis is based on speech act theory and takes into account both the macro‐ and micro‐functions of the various rhetorical units. The results o…
Who am I/who are we in academic writing?L
One of the conspicuous differences infacademic discourse presentation is the preference for use of the first person singular ‘I’ perspective in some languages versus the first person plural ‘we’ perspective in others. This distinction is due not so much to purely linguistic reasons as to cultural ones. The purpose of this paper is to present some data concerning the employment of the two perspectives in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgar…
Co-evolving academic rhetoric across culture; Britain, Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany in the 20th century
Some aspects of the rhetorical structure of specialized written discourse in English, Bulgarian and Russian
The paper focuses on the similarities and differences between the rhetorical structure of some Slavonic (Russian and Bulgarian) and English scientific texts. The aim of the study is to test the widely accepted assumption that scientific discourse has universal features which are language‐independent. The analysis is based on speech act theory and takes into account both the macro‐ and micro‐functions of the various rhetorical units. The results o…
Some aspects of the rhetorical structure of specialized written discourse in English, Bulgarian and Russian
The paper focuses on the similarities and differences between the rhetorical structure of some Slavonic (Russian and Bulgarian) and English scientific texts. The aim of the study is to test the widely accepted assumption that scientific discourse has universal features which are language‐independent. The analysis is based on speech act theory and takes into account both the macro‐ and micro‐functions of the various rhetorical units. The results o…
Who am I/who are we in academic writing?L
One of the conspicuous differences infacademic discourse presentation is the preference for use of the first person singular ‘I’ perspective in some languages versus the first person plural ‘we’ perspective in others. This distinction is due not so much to purely linguistic reasons as to cultural ones. The purpose of this paper is to present some data concerning the employment of the two perspectives in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgar…
Co-evolving academic rhetoric across culture; Britain, Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany in the 20th century
An ‘academic war’ – A case study of confrontation in academia
GenAI and Authorship in Academia
Amid vivid ethical discussions on using AI to assist scholars in the writing process, this contribution tackles the question about Generative AI and authorship from a philosophy of language and academic perspective. In this integrative review, we look into the ways Generative AI impacts the very notion of authorship on the stages of knowledge production, knowledge consumption and knowledge dissemination. We focus on the implications of using Larg…
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (4 works) · Linguistics (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Bulgarian (2 works) · History (2 works) · History (2 works) · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Academic writing (1 work)