Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

John Wigglesworth

Biographic Data

ID1236966
NAMEJohn Wigglesworth
GIVEN NAMESJohn
FAMILY NAMEWigglesworth
SIGNATUREWIGGLESWORTH J
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Vienna
ORCID0000-0002-7305-6844
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS1
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2017
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX1
  • Structuralism and informal provability

    Open Access•Georg Schiemer, John Wigglesworth•ARTICLE•Synthese•2023•References: 37

    Mathematical structuralism can be understood as a theory of mathematical ontology, of the objects that mathematics is about. It can also be understood as a theory of the semantics for mathematical discourse, of how and to what mathematical terms refer. In this paper we propose an epistemological interpretation of mathematical structuralism. According to this interpretation, the main epistemological claim is that mathematical knowledge is purely s…

  • The Structuralist Thesis Reconsidered

    Open Access•Georg Schiemer, John Wigglesworth•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 18

    Øystein Linnebo and Richard Pettigrew ([2014]) have recently developed a version of non-eliminative mathematical structuralism based on Fregean abstraction principles. They argue that their theory of abstract structures proves a consistent version of the structuralist thesis that positions in abstract structures only have structural properties. They do this by defining a subset of the properties of positions in structures, so-called fundamental p…

  • The Boundary Stones of Thought

    John Wigglesworth•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2017

    Debates over which logic is the correct logic, either generally or for a particular area of discourse, pose a distinctive problem. Any justification for a logical law should proceed via an argument, and that argument will likely appeal to the very logical law that is in question. The argument will then be circular, and most likely viciously so. Ian Rumfitt's The Boundary Stones of Thought shows how we can avoid this problem in order to rationally…

  • The Structuralist Thesis Reconsidered

    Open Access•Georg Schiemer, John Wigglesworth•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 18

    Øystein Linnebo and Richard Pettigrew ([2014]) have recently developed a version of non-eliminative mathematical structuralism based on Fregean abstraction principles. They argue that their theory of abstract structures proves a consistent version of the structuralist thesis that positions in abstract structures only have structural properties. They do this by defining a subset of the properties of positions in structures, so-called fundamental p…

  • The Boundary Stones of Thought

    John Wigglesworth•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2017

    Debates over which logic is the correct logic, either generally or for a particular area of discourse, pose a distinctive problem. Any justification for a logical law should proceed via an argument, and that argument will likely appeal to the very logical law that is in question. The argument will then be circular, and most likely viciously so. Ian Rumfitt's The Boundary Stones of Thought shows how we can avoid this problem in order to rationally…

  • The Structuralist Thesis Reconsidered

    Open Access•Georg Schiemer, John Wigglesworth•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 18

    Øystein Linnebo and Richard Pettigrew ([2014]) have recently developed a version of non-eliminative mathematical structuralism based on Fregean abstraction principles. They argue that their theory of abstract structures proves a consistent version of the structuralist thesis that positions in abstract structures only have structural properties. They do this by defining a subset of the properties of positions in structures, so-called fundamental p…

  • Structuralism and informal provability

    Open Access•Georg Schiemer, John Wigglesworth•ARTICLE•Synthese•2023•References: 37

    Mathematical structuralism can be understood as a theory of mathematical ontology, of the objects that mathematics is about. It can also be understood as a theory of the semantics for mathematical discourse, of how and to what mathematical terms refer. In this paper we propose an epistemological interpretation of mathematical structuralism. According to this interpretation, the main epistemological claim is that mathematical knowledge is purely s…

Epistemology (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Linguistics (2 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (2 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 works) · Structuralism (philosophy of science) (2 works) · Abstraction (1 work) · Appeal (1 work) · Argument (complex analysis) (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae