Charles Côté-Bouchard
Biographic Data
| ID | 1285584 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Charles Côté-Bouchard |
| GIVEN NAMES | Charles |
| FAMILY NAME | Côté-Bouchard |
| SIGNATURE | CÔTÉ-BOUCHARD C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Collège Montmorency |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3442-5221 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 7 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Dialogue ’s Graduate Issues Program / Programme de dossiers étudiants de Dialogue
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
The Motivation Problem of Epistemic Expressivists
Many philosophers have adopted epistemic expressivism in recent years. The core commitment of epistemic expressivism is that epistemic claims express conative states. This paper assesses the plausibility of this commitment. First, we raise a new type of problem for epistemic expressivism, the epistemic motivation problem. The problem arises because epistemic expressivists must provide an account of the motivational force of epistemic judgment (th…
Epistemic Consequentialism, Veritism, and Scoring Rules
Two types of epistemic instrumentalism
Ought’ implies ‘can’ against epistemic deontologism: Beyond doxastic involuntarism
Is Epistemic Normativity Value-Based
What is the source of epistemic normativity? In virtue of what do epistemic norms have categorical normative authority? According to epistemic teleologism, epistemic normativity comes from value. Epistemic norms have categorical authority because conforming to them is necessarily good in some relevant sense. In this article, I argue that epistemic teleologism should be rejected. The problem, I argue, is that there is no relevant sense in which it…
Is Epistemic Normativity Value-Based
What is the source of epistemic normativity? In virtue of what do epistemic norms have categorical normative authority? According to epistemic teleologism, epistemic normativity comes from value. Epistemic norms have categorical authority because conforming to them is necessarily good in some relevant sense. In this article, I argue that epistemic teleologism should be rejected. The problem, I argue, is that there is no relevant sense in which it…
Two types of epistemic instrumentalism
Is Epistemic Normativity Value-Based
What is the source of epistemic normativity? In virtue of what do epistemic norms have categorical normative authority? According to epistemic teleologism, epistemic normativity comes from value. Epistemic norms have categorical authority because conforming to them is necessarily good in some relevant sense. In this article, I argue that epistemic teleologism should be rejected. The problem, I argue, is that there is no relevant sense in which it…
Ought’ implies ‘can’ against epistemic deontologism: Beyond doxastic involuntarism
Two types of epistemic instrumentalism
The Motivation Problem of Epistemic Expressivists
Many philosophers have adopted epistemic expressivism in recent years. The core commitment of epistemic expressivism is that epistemic claims express conative states. This paper assesses the plausibility of this commitment. First, we raise a new type of problem for epistemic expressivism, the epistemic motivation problem. The problem arises because epistemic expressivists must provide an account of the motivational force of epistemic judgment (th…
Epistemic Consequentialism, Veritism, and Scoring Rules
Dialogue ’s Graduate Issues Program / Programme de dossiers étudiants de Dialogue
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Epistemology (5 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Free Will and Agency (2 works) · Metaphysics (2 works) · Normative (2 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 works) · Philosophy of language (2 works) · Philosophy of science (2 works)