Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Epistemic Consequentialism, Veritism, and Scoring Rules

Bibliographic Data

ID21461635
AuthorsMarc-Kevin Daoust (0000-0002-6710-1944, Harvard University, corresponding author), Charles Côté-Bouchard (0000-0002-3442-5221, Carleton University)
Year2023
Volume88
Issue4
Pages1741-1765
Publication date2023-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueErkenntnis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0165-0106 • E-ISSN: 1572-8420
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10670-021-00426-5
OpenAlexW3172810401
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited56

Consequentialism · Epistemology · Monism · Ontology · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Free Will and Agency · Medicine · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Elimination Counterexamples

    Leszek Wroński, Michał Tomasz Godziszewski et al.•The British Journal for the…•2025

  • Justification and the Truth-Connection

    Open Access•Clayton Littlejohn•Justification and the Truth-Connect…•2012

  • Accuracy and the Laws of Credence

    Richard Pettigrew•Accuracy and the Laws of Credence•2016

  • The Importance of Being Rational

    Errol Lord•Importance of Being Rational•2018

  • Justifying Conditionalization

    Hilary Greaves, David Wallace•Mind•2006

  • Accuracy and Coherence

    Open Access•James M Joyce•Degrees of Belief•2009

  • Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy

    Open Access•Kevin Dorst•Mind•2019

  • Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation

    Tilmann Gneiting, Adrian E Raftery•Journal of the American…•2007

  • On ‘Truth Is Good’

    Open Access•Marian David•Philosophical Books•2005

  • Rationality Through Reasoning

    Open Access•Ernest Sosa, John Broome•Rationality Through Reasoning•2013

  • Russellian physicalism and its dilemma

    Open Access•Lok‐Chi Chan•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • Scoring methods for multiple choice assessment in higher education – Is it still a matter of number right scoring or negative marking

    Ellen Lesage, Martin Valcke et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2013

  • Who Cares What You Accurately Believe

    Open Access•Clayton Littlejohn•Philosophical Perspectives•2015

  • A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism

    Open Access•James M Joyce•Philosophy of Science•1998

  • A Pragmatist’s Guide to Epistemic Utility

    Open Access•Benjamin A Levinstein•Philosophy of Science•2017

  • Immodest Inductive Methods

    Open Access•David Lewis•Philosophy of Science•1971

  • The Lottery Paradox, Knowledge, and Rationality

    Dana Kay Nelkin•The Philosophical Review•2000

  • The Lottery Paradox, Knowledge, and Rationality

    Dana Kay Nelkin•The Philosophical Review•2000

  • Scoring Imprecise Credences

    Open Access•Conor Mayo‐Wilson, Gregory Wheeler•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2016

  • The Conflict of Evidence and Coherence

    Open Access•Alex Worsnip•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2015

  • Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions

    Selim Berker•The Philosophical Review•2013

  • Arguments for–or against–Probabilism

    Alan Hajek•The British Journal for the…•2008

  • The Value of Rationality

    Ruth Wedgwood, Ralph Wedgwood•Normativity of Rationality•2017

  • The Normativity of Rationality

    Benjamin Kiesewetter•The Normativity of Rationality•2017

  • Is Epistemic Normativity Value-Based

    Open Access•Charles Côté-Bouchard•Dialogue•2017

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae