Jo Eric Khushal Murkens
Biographic Data
| ID | 1323362 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jo Eric Khushal Murkens |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jo Eric Khushal |
| FAMILY NAME | Murkens |
| SIGNATURE | MURKENS J E K |
| AFFILIATIONS | London School of Economics and Political Science |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8897-8860 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 8 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2007 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Preservative or Transformative? Theorizing the U.K. Constitution Using Comparative Method
The complexities of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the European Union while simultaneously honoring its prior commitments to its decentralized, autonomous, and constituent regions have put constitutional questions back on the map. The dominant approach analyzes these questions premised on the “preservative” view of the constitution. This view prioritizes the stability and continuity of the institutions in Westminster (Parliament) …
Mixed Messages in Bottles
An unprecedented eleven‐member UK Supreme Court decided R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union on 24 January 2017. The Government's argument, that it could start the process of withdrawing from the EU using a prerogative power instead of an Act of Parliament, was comprehensively defeated by an 8:3 majority. However, the Government also secured a unanimous verdict that it did not need the consent from the devolved legislatu…
From Empire to Union
This book examines the constitutional relationship between Germany and the European Union from a sociological and historical perspective. Sociologically, it analyses the relationship not purely in shallow, doctrinal terms (e.g. by discussing the authority of the relevant provisions of the Basic Law—although an entire chapter is dedicated to substantive constitutional law and interpretation), but through a deeper, ‘cultural’ analysis that is gener…
Zwischen Vorrangstellung und Ergebenheit
Historisch betrachtet kennt die britische Verfassung nur zwei Staatsorgane: Die Krone und die drei im Parlament vertretenen Stände. Das Fehlen von Gerichten im Modell der gemischten Verfassung ist aus kontinentaleuropäischer Perspektive ungewöhnlich. Die traditionelle Unterordnung der Gerichte unter die »politische Verfassung« begann sich jedoch Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts zu verändern, gipfelnd in der räumlichen Trennung von Justiz und Parlament …
Neither Parochial Nor Cosmopolitan
Comparative Constitutional Law in the Courts
Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America" analyses legal and constitutional developments in all states or regions outside of Europe as well as their regional and international integration. Founded in 1968 and inspired by decolonization and the idea of a cooperative new beginning, the Journal also promotes a special interest in contributions on 'Law and development'. The journal aims to provide a forum for a variety of perspectives on th…
The Future of Staatsrecht
The relationship between the national and the European legal orders is affected by the way it is theorised by the national constitutional traditions. This article will explore the opposing constitutional assumptions in Germany that underlie two interpretations of what in Anglo‐Saxon countries is known as constitutional law: Staatsrecht and Verfassungsrecht. The two contending visions are generated from different conceptions of the European Union …
Herausforderungen und Antworten
Mixed Messages in Bottles
An unprecedented eleven‐member UK Supreme Court decided R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union on 24 January 2017. The Government's argument, that it could start the process of withdrawing from the EU using a prerogative power instead of an Act of Parliament, was comprehensively defeated by an 8:3 majority. However, the Government also secured a unanimous verdict that it did not need the consent from the devolved legislatu…
Comparative Constitutional Law in the Courts
Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America" analyses legal and constitutional developments in all states or regions outside of Europe as well as their regional and international integration. Founded in 1968 and inspired by decolonization and the idea of a cooperative new beginning, the Journal also promotes a special interest in contributions on 'Law and development'. The journal aims to provide a forum for a variety of perspectives on th…
The Future of Staatsrecht
The relationship between the national and the European legal orders is affected by the way it is theorised by the national constitutional traditions. This article will explore the opposing constitutional assumptions in Germany that underlie two interpretations of what in Anglo‐Saxon countries is known as constitutional law: Staatsrecht and Verfassungsrecht. The two contending visions are generated from different conceptions of the European Union …
Herausforderungen und Antworten
Neither Parochial Nor Cosmopolitan
Comparative Constitutional Law in the Courts
Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America" analyses legal and constitutional developments in all states or regions outside of Europe as well as their regional and international integration. Founded in 1968 and inspired by decolonization and the idea of a cooperative new beginning, the Journal also promotes a special interest in contributions on 'Law and development'. The journal aims to provide a forum for a variety of perspectives on th…
Zwischen Vorrangstellung und Ergebenheit
Historisch betrachtet kennt die britische Verfassung nur zwei Staatsorgane: Die Krone und die drei im Parlament vertretenen Stände. Das Fehlen von Gerichten im Modell der gemischten Verfassung ist aus kontinentaleuropäischer Perspektive ungewöhnlich. Die traditionelle Unterordnung der Gerichte unter die »politische Verfassung« begann sich jedoch Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts zu verändern, gipfelnd in der räumlichen Trennung von Justiz und Parlament …
From Empire to Union
This book examines the constitutional relationship between Germany and the European Union from a sociological and historical perspective. Sociologically, it analyses the relationship not purely in shallow, doctrinal terms (e.g. by discussing the authority of the relevant provisions of the Basic Law—although an entire chapter is dedicated to substantive constitutional law and interpretation), but through a deeper, ‘cultural’ analysis that is gener…
Mixed Messages in Bottles
An unprecedented eleven‐member UK Supreme Court decided R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union on 24 January 2017. The Government's argument, that it could start the process of withdrawing from the EU using a prerogative power instead of an Act of Parliament, was comprehensively defeated by an 8:3 majority. However, the Government also secured a unanimous verdict that it did not need the consent from the devolved legislatu…
Preservative or Transformative? Theorizing the U.K. Constitution Using Comparative Method
The complexities of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the European Union while simultaneously honoring its prior commitments to its decentralized, autonomous, and constituent regions have put constitutional questions back on the map. The dominant approach analyzes these questions premised on the “preservative” view of the constitution. This view prioritizes the stability and continuity of the institutions in Westminster (Parliament) …
Political science (8 works) · European and International Law Studies (5 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (5 works) · Law (5 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Constitutional law (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · European union (3 works) · History (3 works) · Law and Political Science (3 works)