Preservative or Transformative? Theorizing the U.K. Constitution Using Comparative Method
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9532104 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jo Eric Khushal Murkens (0000-0001-8897-8860, European University Institute, Florence, Italy, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 412-440 |
| Publication date | 2020-08-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The American Journal of Comparative Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-919X • E-ISSN: 2326-9197 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ajcl/avaa015 |
| OpenAlex | W3042360328 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
The complexities of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the European Union while simultaneously honoring its prior commitments to its decentralized, autonomous, and constituent regions have put constitutional questions back on the map. The dominant approach analyzes these questions premised on the “preservative” view of the constitution. This view prioritizes the stability and continuity of the institutions in Westminster (Parliament) and Whitehall (central executive). However, the preservative view of the constitution is theoretically and practically deficient as it cannot give an account of the multipolar and decentralized developments of the past twenty years. Another interpretation regards the legal and political changes to the constitution as “transformative.” This view accentuates the fragility of the U.K. constitution due to a plurality of constitutional rules and the ongoing processes of devolution of powers within multilevel systems of government. This Article discusses that evolution of the U.K. constitution through the prism of comparative constitutional law and its appropriate methodology. The preservative model of the constitution favors a universalist method, whereas the transformative model requires a contextualist method. I argue that the experience of supranational (European Union) and infranational (devolution) power sharing has fundamentally altered the United Kingdom’s central constitutional concepts. To stabilize its fragmentary forces, the United Kingdom needs to adopt concepts that reflect the state as divided, the constitution as transitional, sovereignty as an attribute of the state rather than Parliament, and democracy as conflicted. Nothing less than the future of the United Kingdom as a state is at stake
Constitution · Constitutional law · Economics · European union · Law and economics · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · State (computer science) · Transformative learning · European and International Law Studies · International Law and Aviation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law
Constitutional pluralism
Towards a Unified Theory of Transitional Justice
Crafting State-Nations—India and Other Multinational Democracies
Why Britain Needs a Written Constitution—and Can't Wait for Parliament to Write One
The politics of territorial identity
Constitutional Referendums
The Frontiers of Legal Analysis
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |