Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Timothy J O''Neill

Biographic Data

ID1324464
NAMETimothy J O''Neill
GIVEN NAMESTimothy J
FAMILY NAMEO''Neill
SIGNATURENEILL T J O
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS17
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1981
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1988
H-INDEX2
  • Liberal Constitutionalism & Bureaucratic Discretion

    Timothy J O''Neill, Timothy J O’neill et al.•ARTICLE•Polity•1988•Cited by: 6

    O’Neill, T. J. (1988). Liberal Constitutionalism & Bureaucratic Discretion. Polity, 20(3), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234868

  • The Imperial Judiciary Meets the Impotent Congress

    Open Access•Timothy J O''Neill, Timothy J O’neill et al.•ARTICLE•Law & Policy•1987•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    The continuing debate over an activist judiciary frequently overlooks the issue whether majoritarian institutions such as Congress can be the principal policy makers for a democracy as well as whether they ought to be. An explicit comparison of the institutional capacities of the Congress and federal courts on abortion funding suggests that Congress is capable of developing representative, responsible, and educative policies. However, a retreat b…

  • The Language of Equality in a Constitutional Order

    Open Access•Timothy J O''Neill, Timothy J O’neill et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1981•Cited by: 10•References: 7

    Like all languages, the language of American law can liberate or confine thinking. Its confining power is illustrated by the absence of the radical "group rights" claim in the Bakke litigation despite the prominence of that argument in the popular debate over affirmative discrimination. This absence establishes the limitations of the metaphor developed to give meaning to the concept "persons" in the equal protection context. While capable of inve…

  • The Language of Equality in a Constitutional Order

    Open Access•Timothy J O''Neill, Timothy J O’neill et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1981•Cited by: 10•References: 7

    Like all languages, the language of American law can liberate or confine thinking. Its confining power is illustrated by the absence of the radical "group rights" claim in the Bakke litigation despite the prominence of that argument in the popular debate over affirmative discrimination. This absence establishes the limitations of the metaphor developed to give meaning to the concept "persons" in the equal protection context. While capable of inve…

  • Liberal Constitutionalism & Bureaucratic Discretion

    Timothy J O''Neill, Timothy J O’neill et al.•ARTICLE•Polity•1988•Cited by: 6

    O’Neill, T. J. (1988). Liberal Constitutionalism & Bureaucratic Discretion. Polity, 20(3), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234868

  • The Imperial Judiciary Meets the Impotent Congress

    Open Access•Timothy J O''Neill, Timothy J O’neill et al.•ARTICLE•Law & Policy•1987•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    The continuing debate over an activist judiciary frequently overlooks the issue whether majoritarian institutions such as Congress can be the principal policy makers for a democracy as well as whether they ought to be. An explicit comparison of the institutional capacities of the Congress and federal courts on abortion funding suggests that Congress is capable of developing representative, responsible, and educative policies. However, a retreat b…

  • The Language of Equality in a Constitutional Order

    Open Access•Timothy J O''Neill, Timothy J O’neill et al.•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1981•Cited by: 10•References: 7

    Like all languages, the language of American law can liberate or confine thinking. Its confining power is illustrated by the absence of the radical "group rights" claim in the Bakke litigation despite the prominence of that argument in the popular debate over affirmative discrimination. This absence establishes the limitations of the metaphor developed to give meaning to the concept "persons" in the equal protection context. While capable of inve…

  • The Imperial Judiciary Meets the Impotent Congress

    Open Access•Timothy J O''Neill, Timothy J O’neill et al.•ARTICLE•Law & Policy•1987•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    The continuing debate over an activist judiciary frequently overlooks the issue whether majoritarian institutions such as Congress can be the principal policy makers for a democracy as well as whether they ought to be. An explicit comparison of the institutional capacities of the Congress and federal courts on abortion funding suggests that Congress is capable of developing representative, responsible, and educative policies. However, a retreat b…

  • Liberal Constitutionalism & Bureaucratic Discretion

    Timothy J O''Neill, Timothy J O’neill et al.•ARTICLE•Polity•1988•Cited by: 6

    O’Neill, T. J. (1988). Liberal Constitutionalism & Bureaucratic Discretion. Polity, 20(3), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234868

Law (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Law and economics (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 works) · Bureaucracy (2 works) · Constitutional law (2 works) · Democracy (2 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae