Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Imperial Judiciary Meets the Impotent Congress

Bibliographic Data

ID6090433
AuthorsTimothy J O''Neill, Timothy J O’neill (0000-0003-2108-8008, corresponding author), Timothy J O'Neill
Year1987
Volume9
Issue1
Pages97-117
Publication date1987-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9930.1987.tb00399.x
OpenAlexW2143069246
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited11

The continuing debate over an activist judiciary frequently overlooks the issue whether majoritarian institutions such as Congress can be the principal policy makers for a democracy as well as whether they ought to be. An explicit comparison of the institutional capacities of the Congress and federal courts on abortion funding suggests that Congress is capable of developing representative, responsible, and educative policies. However, a retreat by the “Imperial Judiciary” from an activist posture would not necessarily transfer power from the courts to the Congress but from the courts to unelected bureaucracies within the Congress and the Presidency

Bureaucracy · Democracy · Law and economics · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Presidency · Principal (computer security · Separation of powers · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Public Administration

  • Il Giudice Nei Regimi Democratici

    Open Access•Patrizia Pederzoli•Italian Political Science…•1990

  • Abortion

    E Manier, Wanqing Liu et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1978

  • The Role of the Supreme Court in American Government

    Archibald Cox•Stanford Law Review•1976

  • Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation

    Open Access•Karen O’connor, Karen O'Connor et al.•Law & Society Review•1982

  • The Search for Information

    Open Access•Robert Zwier•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1979

  • Role Perceptions and Behavior in Three U.S. Courts of Appeals

    John W Howard, J Woodford Howard J Woodford Howard•The Journal of Politics•1977

  • Public Opinion and Federal Judicial Policy

    Beverly B Cook•American Journal of Political…•1977

  • Constituency Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Warren E Miller, Donald E Stokes et al.•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Political Orientations, Social Backgrounds, and Role Perceptions of State Supreme Court Judges

    John T Wold•The Western Political Quarterly•1974

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,03
Citation span1990 - 1990 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae