Timothy J O'Neill
Biographic Data
| ID | 4532338 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Timothy J O'Neill |
| GIVEN NAMES | Timothy J |
| FAMILY NAME | O'Neill |
| SIGNATURE | NEILL T J O |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 17 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1981 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1990 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Belonging to America: Equal Citizenship and the Constitution. Kenneth L. Karst
Liberal Constitutionalism & Bureaucratic Discretion
O’Neill, T. J. (1988). Liberal Constitutionalism & Bureaucratic Discretion. Polity, 20(3), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234868
The Imperial Judiciary Meets the Impotent Congress
The continuing debate over an activist judiciary frequently overlooks the issue whether majoritarian institutions such as Congress can be the principal policy makers for a democracy as well as whether they ought to be. An explicit comparison of the institutional capacities of the Congress and federal courts on abortion funding suggests that Congress is capable of developing representative, responsible, and educative policies. However, a retreat b…
The Language of Equality in a Constitutional Order
Like all languages, the language of American law can liberate or confine thinking. Its confining power is illustrated by the absence of the radical "group rights" claim in the Bakke litigation despite the prominence of that argument in the popular debate over affirmative discrimination. This absence establishes the limitations of the metaphor developed to give meaning to the concept "persons" in the equal protection context. While capable of inve…
The Language of Equality in a Constitutional Order
Like all languages, the language of American law can liberate or confine thinking. Its confining power is illustrated by the absence of the radical "group rights" claim in the Bakke litigation despite the prominence of that argument in the popular debate over affirmative discrimination. This absence establishes the limitations of the metaphor developed to give meaning to the concept "persons" in the equal protection context. While capable of inve…
Liberal Constitutionalism & Bureaucratic Discretion
O’Neill, T. J. (1988). Liberal Constitutionalism & Bureaucratic Discretion. Polity, 20(3), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234868
The Imperial Judiciary Meets the Impotent Congress
The continuing debate over an activist judiciary frequently overlooks the issue whether majoritarian institutions such as Congress can be the principal policy makers for a democracy as well as whether they ought to be. An explicit comparison of the institutional capacities of the Congress and federal courts on abortion funding suggests that Congress is capable of developing representative, responsible, and educative policies. However, a retreat b…
The Language of Equality in a Constitutional Order
Like all languages, the language of American law can liberate or confine thinking. Its confining power is illustrated by the absence of the radical "group rights" claim in the Bakke litigation despite the prominence of that argument in the popular debate over affirmative discrimination. This absence establishes the limitations of the metaphor developed to give meaning to the concept "persons" in the equal protection context. While capable of inve…
The Imperial Judiciary Meets the Impotent Congress
The continuing debate over an activist judiciary frequently overlooks the issue whether majoritarian institutions such as Congress can be the principal policy makers for a democracy as well as whether they ought to be. An explicit comparison of the institutional capacities of the Congress and federal courts on abortion funding suggests that Congress is capable of developing representative, responsible, and educative policies. However, a retreat b…
Liberal Constitutionalism & Bureaucratic Discretion
O’Neill, T. J. (1988). Liberal Constitutionalism & Bureaucratic Discretion. Polity, 20(3), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234868
Belonging to America: Equal Citizenship and the Constitution. Kenneth L. Karst
Law (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 works) · Law and economics (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Bureaucracy (2 works) · Constitution (2 works) · Constitutional law (2 works)