T Casciaro
Biographic Data
| ID | 1435 |
|---|---|
| NAME | T Casciaro |
| GIVEN NAMES | T |
| FAMILY NAME | Casciaro |
| SIGNATURE | CASCIARO T |
| AFFILIATIONS | Carnegie Mellon University |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3757-4756 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 4 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1998 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Why connect? Moral consequences of networking with a promotion or prevention focus
Networks are a key source of social capital for achieving goals in professional and personal settings. Yet, despite the clear benefits of having an extensive network, individuals often shy away from the opportunity to create new connections because engaging in instrumental networking can make them feel morally impure. In this article, we explore how the motives people have when engaging in networking impact these feelings and, as result, change h…
Resource Dependence
Resource‐dependence theory marked a watershed by positioning power at the core of organizational theory.
When Competence Is Irrelevant
This paper examines the role of a person's generalized positive or negative feelings toward someone (interpersonal affect) in task-related networks in organizations. We theorize that negative interpersonal affect renders task competence virtually irrelevant in a person's choice of a partner for task interactions but that positive interpersonal affect increases a person's reliance on competence as a criterion for choosing task partners, facilitati…
When More Power Makes Actors Worse Off
We propose a theory which predicts that an increase in an actor's relative power reduces the actor's rewards in high mutual dependence dyads. Our argument is based on the premise that higher relative power gives the more powerful actor a greater share of surplus, but it also reduces dyadic exchange frequency, which lowers the expected magnitude of that surplus. As mutual dependence increases, fairness issues associated with power imbalances reduc…
Seeing things clearly
When More Power Makes Actors Worse Off
We propose a theory which predicts that an increase in an actor's relative power reduces the actor's rewards in high mutual dependence dyads. Our argument is based on the premise that higher relative power gives the more powerful actor a greater share of surplus, but it also reduces dyadic exchange frequency, which lowers the expected magnitude of that surplus. As mutual dependence increases, fairness issues associated with power imbalances reduc…
Seeing things clearly
When More Power Makes Actors Worse Off
We propose a theory which predicts that an increase in an actor's relative power reduces the actor's rewards in high mutual dependence dyads. Our argument is based on the premise that higher relative power gives the more powerful actor a greater share of surplus, but it also reduces dyadic exchange frequency, which lowers the expected magnitude of that surplus. As mutual dependence increases, fairness issues associated with power imbalances reduc…
When Competence Is Irrelevant
This paper examines the role of a person's generalized positive or negative feelings toward someone (interpersonal affect) in task-related networks in organizations. We theorize that negative interpersonal affect renders task competence virtually irrelevant in a person's choice of a partner for task interactions but that positive interpersonal affect increases a person's reliance on competence as a criterion for choosing task partners, facilitati…
Resource Dependence
Resource‐dependence theory marked a watershed by positioning power at the core of organizational theory.
Why connect? Moral consequences of networking with a promotion or prevention focus
Networks are a key source of social capital for achieving goals in professional and personal settings. Yet, despite the clear benefits of having an extensive network, individuals often shy away from the opportunity to create new connections because engaging in instrumental networking can make them feel morally impure. In this article, we explore how the motives people have when engaging in networking impact these feelings and, as result, change h…
Psychology (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Business (2 works) · Economics (2 works) · Feeling (2 works) · Microeconomics (2 works) · Perception (2 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 works) · Social Power and Status Dynamics (2 works)