Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

When More Power Makes Actors Worse Off

Turning a Profit in the American Economy

Bibliographic Data

ID2959747
AuthorsMikołaj Jan Piskorski (0000-0001-6260-7367, Harvard University Press, corresponding author), T Casciaro (0000-0003-3757-4756, Harvard University Press)
Year2006
Volume85
Issue2
Pages1011-1036
Publication date2006-12-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Forces (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0037-7732 • E-ISSN: 1534-7605
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1353/sof.2007.0021
OpenAlexW2103566584
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited24

We propose a theory which predicts that an increase in an actor's relative power reduces the actor's rewards in high mutual dependence dyads. Our argument is based on the premise that higher relative power gives the more powerful actor a greater share of surplus, but it also reduces dyadic exchange frequency, which lowers the expected magnitude of that surplus. As mutual dependence increases, fairness issues associated with power imbalances reduce exchange frequency and expected surplus at an increasingly higher rate. Thus, at a certain level of mutual dependence, the more powerful actor obtains a greater share of a much smaller exchange surplus leading him or her to be worse off than he would be in an equal-power dyad. We support this prediction with data on profit rates in American industries from 1977 through 1992

Argument (complex analysis) · Bargaining power · Dyad · Econometrics · Economics · Exchange rate · Microeconomics · Monetary economics · Power (physics) · Premise · Profit (economics) · Purchasing power parity · Relative purchasing power parity · Surplus value · Economic Theory and Institutions · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Law · Psychology · Social Power and Status Dynamics · Social Psychology

  • Resource Dependence and Indirect Power

    Open Access•Jeongwon Choi, John P Walsh•The Journal of Higher Education•2026

  • Tie Dissolution in Market Networks

    Open Access•David R Clough, Henning Piezunka•Administrative Science Quarterly•2020

  • Power asymmetries in tourism distribution networks

    Open Access•Robert C Ford, Youcheng Wang et al.•Annals of Tourism Research•2012

  • Corporate profits and cooptation

    Ronald S Burt•Corporate profits and cooptation•1983

  • Bargaining, power, tactics, and outcomes

    Samuel B Bacharach•Bargaining, power, tactics, and…•1981

  • Economic Action and Social Structure

    Mark Granovetter•Readings in Economic Sociology•2002

  • Coercive Power in Social Exchange

    Open Access•Linda D Molm•Coercive Power in Social Exchange•1997

  • Structural Holes

    R S Burt•Structural Holes•1992

  • Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments

    Kathleen M Eisenhardt, L J Bourgeois•Academy of Management Journal•1988

  • Toward a structural theory of action

    Ronald S Burt•Toward a structural theory of…•1982

  • The Social Structure of Competition

    R S Burt, Ronald Burt•Networks in the knowledge economy•2003

  • Power-Dependence Relations

    Richard M Emerson•American Sociological Review•1962

  • Two Approaches to Social Structure

    K S Cook, Joseph M Whitmeyer•Annual Review of Sociology•1992

  • The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations

    Brian Uzzi•American Sociological Review•1996

  • Power in exchange networks

    Open Access•K S Cook, Toshio Yamagishi•Social Networks•1992

  • The Incidence of Exchange Networks

    N E Friedkin•Social Psychology Quarterly•1995

  • Networks, Exchange and Coercion

    Henry A Walker, D Willer et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1982

  • A formal theory of social power

    N E Friedkin•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1986

  • Structure, Action, and Outcomes

    Linda D Molm•American Sociological Review•1990

  • Power and the Emergence of Commitment Behavior in Negotiated Exchange

    Edward J Lawler, Jeongkoo Yoon•American Sociological Review•1993

  • Commitment in Exchange Relations

    Edward J Lawler, Jeongkoo Yoon•American Sociological Review•1996

  • Exclusion and Power

    J Skvoretz, D Willer•American Sociological Review•1993

  • Power Processes in Bargaining

    Open Access•Edward J Lawler•Sociological Quarterly•1992

  • Network Connections and the Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks

    Toshio Yamagishi, Mary Rogers Gillmore et al.•American Journal of Sociology•1988

  • The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks

    K S Cook, Richard M Emerson et al.•American Journal of Sociology•1983

  • Restricted Access in Networks and Models of Power

    P V Marsden•American Journal of Sociology•1983

  • Autonomy in a Social Topology

    R S Burt•American Journal of Sociology•1980

Citations per year0.21
Citation span2012 - 2026 (15)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae