Chizuko Yoshimizu
Biographic Data
| ID | 1443696 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Chizuko Yoshimizu |
| GIVEN NAMES | Chizuko |
| FAMILY NAME | Yoshimizu |
| SIGNATURE | YOSHIMIZU C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Professor, University of Tsukuba, Dr.phil. |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 7 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2002 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
The Historical Development of the Negation of Arising from Other in Madhyamaka Tradition: The Turning Point by Kamalaśīla
The negation of arising from other in Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā and its commentaries aimed to validate the ultimate Madhyamaka doctrine of non-arising by refuting the Ābhidharmika Buddhist view that a thing arises from its conditions. As epistemology and logic developed and debates took place between Buddhists and non-Buddhists, the theory of causality or the question of how to establish a causal relation became a point of interest for sch…
Updating Prāsaṅgika and prasaṅga
帰謬派(*Prāsaṅgika)と自立派(*Svātantrika)という中観派の区分は,チベットにチャンドラキールティの著作を翻訳・紹介したパツァプ・ニマタク(1055–1145?)に帰せられる『根本中論般若釈』(カダム文集第11巻所収)に確認されるが,この著作はカシミールでインド人の共訳者マハースマティの講釈にもとづき著されたことから,11世紀後半には少なくとも一部のインド仏教徒の間で用いられていたと考えられる.パツァプは自らを「帰謬派」と名乗り,この時期に明確な帰属意識が生まれていたことを示す.本稿では,『根本中論般若釈』写本の解読により,パツァプが考えていた「帰謬派」「帰謬論証」とはいかなるものかを論じた.彼にとって「自立派」「帰謬派」の対立とは,バーヴィヴェーカとチャンドラキールティの間の『中論』第1章の解釈をめぐる論争に端を発しながらも,自らに先行する8世紀の中観派学匠シャーンタラクシタ,カマラシーラ師弟の著作と自らとの対峙であった.この対峙がなければ,「帰謬派」という自覚は…
Western Explorations into Eastern Spiritual Worlds
Two books, one by M. Kapstein, the other a joint effort headed up by E. Steinkellner, raise questions of the study of Indian philosophy, Buddhism and Confucianism. Although the two books were published eight years apart, they share a comparative perspective of and a reflection on the possibility of philosophy in Asia and Buddhism. The present review article first offers general considerations on the aims of authors with a brief survey of each art…
A Tibetan Buddhist Text from the Twelfth Century Unknown to Later Tibetans
Le système dbu ma (Madhyamaka) des premiers maîtres tibétains a toujours été reconstruit en se fondant sur une transmission tardive ; en effet, seuls un petit nombre de leurs écrits sont accessibles. En dépit de son développement tardif, la première interprétation du système du thal 'gyur ba (*Prāsangika), qui vient des écrits du grand traducteur Candrakīrti, Pa tshab Nyi ma grags (1055-), est toujours sujette à caution. Ses écrits et ceux de ses…
Dreyfus, Georges B.J., Recognizing Reality: Dharmakīrti's Philosophy and Its Tibetan Interpretations . [Suny Series in Buddhist Studies]
Die Erkenntinislehre des Prāsaṅgika-Madhyamaka: Nach dem Tshi gsal ston thun gyi tshad ma'i rnam bsad des 'Jam dbyans bzad pa'i rdo rje: Einleitung, Textanalyse, Übersertzung
Yotsuya, Kodo, The Critique of Svatantra Reasoning by Candrakīrit and Tsong-kha-pa. A Study of Philosophical Proof According to Two Prāsangika Madhyamaka Traditions of India and Tibet
No prominent works on this page.
Yotsuya, Kodo, The Critique of Svatantra Reasoning by Candrakīrit and Tsong-kha-pa. A Study of Philosophical Proof According to Two Prāsangika Madhyamaka Traditions of India and Tibet
Dreyfus, Georges B.J., Recognizing Reality: Dharmakīrti's Philosophy and Its Tibetan Interpretations . [Suny Series in Buddhist Studies]
Die Erkenntinislehre des Prāsaṅgika-Madhyamaka: Nach dem Tshi gsal ston thun gyi tshad ma'i rnam bsad des 'Jam dbyans bzad pa'i rdo rje: Einleitung, Textanalyse, Übersertzung
A Tibetan Buddhist Text from the Twelfth Century Unknown to Later Tibetans
Le système dbu ma (Madhyamaka) des premiers maîtres tibétains a toujours été reconstruit en se fondant sur une transmission tardive ; en effet, seuls un petit nombre de leurs écrits sont accessibles. En dépit de son développement tardif, la première interprétation du système du thal 'gyur ba (*Prāsangika), qui vient des écrits du grand traducteur Candrakīrti, Pa tshab Nyi ma grags (1055-), est toujours sujette à caution. Ses écrits et ceux de ses…
Western Explorations into Eastern Spiritual Worlds
Two books, one by M. Kapstein, the other a joint effort headed up by E. Steinkellner, raise questions of the study of Indian philosophy, Buddhism and Confucianism. Although the two books were published eight years apart, they share a comparative perspective of and a reflection on the possibility of philosophy in Asia and Buddhism. The present review article first offers general considerations on the aims of authors with a brief survey of each art…
Updating Prāsaṅgika and prasaṅga
帰謬派(*Prāsaṅgika)と自立派(*Svātantrika)という中観派の区分は,チベットにチャンドラキールティの著作を翻訳・紹介したパツァプ・ニマタク(1055–1145?)に帰せられる『根本中論般若釈』(カダム文集第11巻所収)に確認されるが,この著作はカシミールでインド人の共訳者マハースマティの講釈にもとづき著されたことから,11世紀後半には少なくとも一部のインド仏教徒の間で用いられていたと考えられる.パツァプは自らを「帰謬派」と名乗り,この時期に明確な帰属意識が生まれていたことを示す.本稿では,『根本中論般若釈』写本の解読により,パツァプが考えていた「帰謬派」「帰謬論証」とはいかなるものかを論じた.彼にとって「自立派」「帰謬派」の対立とは,バーヴィヴェーカとチャンドラキールティの間の『中論』第1章の解釈をめぐる論争に端を発しながらも,自らに先行する8世紀の中観派学匠シャーンタラクシタ,カマラシーラ師弟の著作と自らとの対峙であった.この対峙がなければ,「帰謬派」という自覚は…
The Historical Development of the Negation of Arising from Other in Madhyamaka Tradition: The Turning Point by Kamalaśīla
The negation of arising from other in Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā and its commentaries aimed to validate the ultimate Madhyamaka doctrine of non-arising by refuting the Ābhidharmika Buddhist view that a thing arises from its conditions. As epistemology and logic developed and debates took place between Buddhists and non-Buddhists, the theory of causality or the question of how to establish a causal relation became a point of interest for sch…
Indian and Buddhist Studies (7 works) · Philosophy (6 works) · Indian History and Philosophy (5 works) · Theology (4 works) · Buddhism (3 works) · Chinese history and philosophy (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Art (2 works) · Buddhist philosophy (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works)