Thomas M Tripp
Biographic Data
| ID | 146896 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Thomas M Tripp |
| GIVEN NAMES | Thomas M |
| FAMILY NAME | Tripp |
| SIGNATURE | TRIPP T M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Washington State University Vancouver |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4910-7189 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 12 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 27 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 12 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1993 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Restoring dignity at work: The role of offender reintegration in moral repair outcomes
Purpose The emerging moral repair literature suggests that, in the aftermath of workplace wrongdoing, reintegrating offenders reaps numerous benefits, not just for the offender, but for the organization. However, only a small number of empirical studies have investigated whether reintegration actually produces these outcomes, and little is known about how and why these relationships occur. The purpose of this paper is to examine how and when offe…
When and How Underdog Expectations Promote Cheating Behavior: The Roles of Need Fulfillment and General Self-efficacy
P areto Optimality
A Pareto optimal allocation is one from which it is impossible to improve any party's share without diminishing the share of another party. When allocating resources, whether through a negotiation process, political process, or simply by edict, the question arises: How do you know whether the final allocation is a “good” one? Regardless of one's philosophy, a necessary condition for “goodness” with which few people would argue is Pareto optimalit…
When Customer Love Turns into Lasting Hate: The Effects of Relationship Strength and Time on Customer Revenge and Avoidance
This article explores the effects of time and relationship strength on the evolution of customer revenge and avoidance in online public complaining contexts. First, the authors examine whether online complainers hold a grudge—in terms of revenge and avoidance desires—over time. They find that time affects the two desires differently: Although revenge decreases over time, avoidance increases over time, indicating that customers indeed hold a grudg…
A Vigilante Model of Justice: Revenge, Reconciliation, Forgiveness, and Avoidance
Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations.
A field study and an experimental study examined relationships among organizational variables and various responses of victims to perceived wrongdoing. Both studies showed that procedural justice climate moderates the effect of organizational variables on the victim's revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, or avoidance behaviors. In Study 1, a field study, absolute hierarchical status enhanced forgiveness and reconciliation, but only when percepti…
How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace.
This study investigated the relationships between blame, victim and offender status, and the pursuit of revenge or reconciliation after a personal offense. Results from a sample of 141 government agency employees showed that blame is positively related to revenge and negatively related to reconciliation. In addition, victim-offender relative status moderated the relation between blame and revenge such that victims who blamed sought revenge more o…
Two Faces of the Powerless: Coping with Tyranny in Organizations
Beyond Distrust: “Getting Even” and the Need for Revenge
Is outcome fairness used to make procedural fairness judgments when procedural information is inaccessible
Procedural fairness and profit seeking: The perceived legitimacy of market exploitation
Recent studies by Kahneman et al. (1986a, b) present consistent evidence that the economically rational decision of market exploitation is perceived as unfair by individuals. Further, these fairness judgments are influenced by the sign of the outcome—that is, an outcome coded as a gain is perceived as fairer than an objectively similar outcome coded as a loss, particularly when they occur for the benefit of the exploiter. As an extension of the K…
Power and fairness in negotiations
A Vigilante Model of Justice: Revenge, Reconciliation, Forgiveness, and Avoidance
Procedural fairness and profit seeking: The perceived legitimacy of market exploitation
Recent studies by Kahneman et al. (1986a, b) present consistent evidence that the economically rational decision of market exploitation is perceived as unfair by individuals. Further, these fairness judgments are influenced by the sign of the outcome—that is, an outcome coded as a gain is perceived as fairer than an objectively similar outcome coded as a loss, particularly when they occur for the benefit of the exploiter. As an extension of the K…
Is outcome fairness used to make procedural fairness judgments when procedural information is inaccessible
Power and fairness in negotiations
Procedural fairness and profit seeking: The perceived legitimacy of market exploitation
Recent studies by Kahneman et al. (1986a, b) present consistent evidence that the economically rational decision of market exploitation is perceived as unfair by individuals. Further, these fairness judgments are influenced by the sign of the outcome—that is, an outcome coded as a gain is perceived as fairer than an objectively similar outcome coded as a loss, particularly when they occur for the benefit of the exploiter. As an extension of the K…
Power and fairness in negotiations
Beyond Distrust: “Getting Even” and the Need for Revenge
Is outcome fairness used to make procedural fairness judgments when procedural information is inaccessible
Two Faces of the Powerless: Coping with Tyranny in Organizations
How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace.
This study investigated the relationships between blame, victim and offender status, and the pursuit of revenge or reconciliation after a personal offense. Results from a sample of 141 government agency employees showed that blame is positively related to revenge and negatively related to reconciliation. In addition, victim-offender relative status moderated the relation between blame and revenge such that victims who blamed sought revenge more o…
Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations.
A field study and an experimental study examined relationships among organizational variables and various responses of victims to perceived wrongdoing. Both studies showed that procedural justice climate moderates the effect of organizational variables on the victim's revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, or avoidance behaviors. In Study 1, a field study, absolute hierarchical status enhanced forgiveness and reconciliation, but only when percepti…
A Vigilante Model of Justice: Revenge, Reconciliation, Forgiveness, and Avoidance
When Customer Love Turns into Lasting Hate: The Effects of Relationship Strength and Time on Customer Revenge and Avoidance
This article explores the effects of time and relationship strength on the evolution of customer revenge and avoidance in online public complaining contexts. First, the authors examine whether online complainers hold a grudge—in terms of revenge and avoidance desires—over time. They find that time affects the two desires differently: Although revenge decreases over time, avoidance increases over time, indicating that customers indeed hold a grudg…
P areto Optimality
A Pareto optimal allocation is one from which it is impossible to improve any party's share without diminishing the share of another party. When allocating resources, whether through a negotiation process, political process, or simply by edict, the question arises: How do you know whether the final allocation is a “good” one? Regardless of one's philosophy, a necessary condition for “goodness” with which few people would argue is Pareto optimalit…
When and How Underdog Expectations Promote Cheating Behavior: The Roles of Need Fulfillment and General Self-efficacy
Restoring dignity at work: The role of offender reintegration in moral repair outcomes
Purpose The emerging moral repair literature suggests that, in the aftermath of workplace wrongdoing, reintegrating offenders reaps numerous benefits, not just for the offender, but for the organization. However, only a small number of empirical studies have investigated whether reintegration actually produces these outcomes, and little is known about how and why these relationships occur. The purpose of this paper is to examine how and when offe…
Psychology (10 works) · Political science (9 works) · Social Psychology (9 works) · Law (6 works) · Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (5 works) · Conflict Management and Negotiation (4 works) · Economics (4 works) · Microeconomics (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 works)