Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Catherine Albiston

Biographic Data

ID1493370
NAMECatherine Albiston
GIVEN NAMESCatherine
FAMILY NAMEAlbiston
SIGNATUREALBISTON C
AFFILIATIONSSchool of Law, JSP Program and Sociology Department University of California Berkeley Berkeley California USA
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS48
AUTHOR COUNT4
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1999
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX2
  • The Hamster Wheel Is on Fire”: How the Pandemic Amplified Inequality in the Academy

    Open Access•Catherine Albiston, Tonya L Brito et al.•ARTICLE•Gender Work and Organization•2025•References: 17

    Institutional practices often recreate inequalities within organizations, especially in times of crisis like the COVID pandemic. Although early pandemic research expressed alarm that increased caregiving demands were reducing women's research productivity, it paid less attention to changing work demands. By contrast, this article examines whether pandemic changes in academic work demands varied across race and gender, drawing on survey data from …

  • Law’s Normative Influence on Gender Schemas: An Experimental Study on Counteracting Workplace Bias against Mothers and Caregivers

    Open Access•Catherine R Albiston, Catherine Albiston et al.•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•2023•References: 34

    Status-based theories of labor market inequality contend that, even when workers have identical qualifications and performance, employers evaluate them differently based on stereotypes about their status group. Gender and parenthood are status characteristics that affect decisions about hiring, pay, and promotion through stereotypes that mothers should not work, fathers should not take leave, and caregivers of either gender are less reliable, com…

  • Public Interest Law Organizations and the Two-Tier System of Access to Justice in the United States

    Open Access•Catherine R Albiston, Catherine Albiston et al.•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•2016•Cited by: 6•References: 23

    Public interest law organizations (PILOs) are important institutions for providing access to justice in the United States. How have political, economic, and institutional factors shaped PILOs? How do PILOs vary in the services they offer and in their geographical location relative to poverty and population in the United States? This article investigates these questions by combining original survey data from a representative sample of public inter…

  • The Rule of Law and the Litigation Process: The Paradox of Losing by Winning

    Open Access•Catherine R Albiston, Catherine Albiston•ARTICLE•Law & Society Review•1999•Cited by: 42•References: 42

    This article expands upon the idea that repeat players influence the development of law by settling cases they are likely to lose and litigating cases they are likely to win. Through empirical analysis of judicial opinions interpreting the Family and Medical Leave Act, it shows how the rule-making opportunities in the litigation process affect the development of law and the judicial determination of statutory rights. In addition, the article expl…

  • The Rule of Law and the Litigation Process: The Paradox of Losing by Winning

    Open Access•Catherine R Albiston, Catherine Albiston•ARTICLE•Law & Society Review•1999•Cited by: 42•References: 42

    This article expands upon the idea that repeat players influence the development of law by settling cases they are likely to lose and litigating cases they are likely to win. Through empirical analysis of judicial opinions interpreting the Family and Medical Leave Act, it shows how the rule-making opportunities in the litigation process affect the development of law and the judicial determination of statutory rights. In addition, the article expl…

  • Public Interest Law Organizations and the Two-Tier System of Access to Justice in the United States

    Open Access•Catherine R Albiston, Catherine Albiston et al.•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•2016•Cited by: 6•References: 23

    Public interest law organizations (PILOs) are important institutions for providing access to justice in the United States. How have political, economic, and institutional factors shaped PILOs? How do PILOs vary in the services they offer and in their geographical location relative to poverty and population in the United States? This article investigates these questions by combining original survey data from a representative sample of public inter…

  • The Rule of Law and the Litigation Process: The Paradox of Losing by Winning

    Open Access•Catherine R Albiston, Catherine Albiston•ARTICLE•Law & Society Review•1999•Cited by: 42•References: 42

    This article expands upon the idea that repeat players influence the development of law by settling cases they are likely to lose and litigating cases they are likely to win. Through empirical analysis of judicial opinions interpreting the Family and Medical Leave Act, it shows how the rule-making opportunities in the litigation process affect the development of law and the judicial determination of statutory rights. In addition, the article expl…

  • Public Interest Law Organizations and the Two-Tier System of Access to Justice in the United States

    Open Access•Catherine R Albiston, Catherine Albiston et al.•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•2016•Cited by: 6•References: 23

    Public interest law organizations (PILOs) are important institutions for providing access to justice in the United States. How have political, economic, and institutional factors shaped PILOs? How do PILOs vary in the services they offer and in their geographical location relative to poverty and population in the United States? This article investigates these questions by combining original survey data from a representative sample of public inter…

  • Law’s Normative Influence on Gender Schemas: An Experimental Study on Counteracting Workplace Bias against Mothers and Caregivers

    Open Access•Catherine R Albiston, Catherine Albiston et al.•ARTICLE•Law & Social Inquiry•2023•References: 34

    Status-based theories of labor market inequality contend that, even when workers have identical qualifications and performance, employers evaluate them differently based on stereotypes about their status group. Gender and parenthood are status characteristics that affect decisions about hiring, pay, and promotion through stereotypes that mothers should not work, fathers should not take leave, and caregivers of either gender are less reliable, com…

  • The Hamster Wheel Is on Fire”: How the Pandemic Amplified Inequality in the Academy

    Open Access•Catherine Albiston, Tonya L Brito et al.•ARTICLE•Gender Work and Organization•2025•References: 17

    Institutional practices often recreate inequalities within organizations, especially in times of crisis like the COVID pandemic. Although early pandemic research expressed alarm that increased caregiving demands were reducing women's research productivity, it paid less attention to changing work demands. By contrast, this article examines whether pandemic changes in academic work demands varied across race and gender, drawing on survey data from …

Law (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Economics (2 works) · Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 works) · Inequality (2 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 works) · Work (physics (2 works) · Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 works) · Affect (linguistics (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae