Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Rule of Law and the Litigation Process

The Paradox of Losing by Winning

Bibliographic Data

ID4085154
AuthorsCatherine R Albiston (0000-0003-1306-2326, corresponding author), Catherine Albiston
Year1999
Volume33
Issue4
Pages869-910
Publication date1999-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Society Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3115153
OpenAlexW3121302341
LanguageEN
Citations received47
References cited53

This article expands upon the idea that repeat players influence the development of law by settling cases they are likely to lose and litigating cases they are likely to win. Through empirical analysis of judicial opinions interpreting the Family and Medical Leave Act, it shows how the rule-making opportunities in the litigation process affect the development of law and the judicial determination of statutory rights. In addition, the article explains how early judicial opinions might influence later judicial interpretations of the law. Although individuals may successfully mobilize the law to gain benefits in their disputes, that success often removes their experiences from the judicial determination of rights, limiting law's capacity to produce social change. This paradox of losing by winning separates the dispute resolution function of courts from their lawmaking function and raises questions about the legitimacy of law

Common law · Due process · Economics · Law and economics · Political science · Process (computing · Rule of law · Sources of law · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal principles and applications

  • European Human Rights Justice and Privatisation

    Gaëtan Cliquennois, Rachel A Cichowski et al.•European Human Rights Justice and…•2020

  • Law

    Open Access•Lauren B Edelman, Lauren Edelman et al.•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Law as an Instrument of Social Change

    Open Access•Catherine R Albiston, Gwendolyn M Leachman et al.•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Discrimination and the Law

    Open Access•Deborah C Malamud•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Rechtsmobilisierung. Ein Systematisierungsversuch

    Gesine Fuchs•Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie•2021

  • Transitional Justice and Corporate Accountability from Below

    Open Access•Leigh A Payne, Gabriel Pereira et al.•Transitional Justice and…•2020

  • Who Are You and What’s Your Issue? Winning in Collective Litigation in Colombia

    Open Access•Angela M Páez•Latin American Research Review•2023

  • Employment Discrimination Lawsuits and Corporate Stock Prices

    Open Access•C Elizabeth Hirsh, Youngjoo Cha•Social Currents•2015

  • Testing Representational Advantage in the Argentine Supreme Court

    Open Access•Sergio Muro, Alejandro Chehtman et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Judicial Review of Executive Power in the Singaporean Context, 1965–2012

    Open Access•Lynette J Chua, Stacia L Haynie•Journal of Law and Courts•2016

  • The role of legal intermediaries in the dispute pyramid

    Open Access•A Lejeune, A Spire•International Journal of Law in…•2021

  • Gender Inequalities in Markets

    Tamar Kricheli-Katz•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2021

  • Divergent Paths

    Robert L Nelson, Ellen Berrey et al.•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2008

  • Half Empty, Half Full, or Neither

    Open Access•R Stryker•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2007

  • Corporate Complicity in International Human Rights Violations

    Open Access•Leigh A Payne, Gabriel Pereira•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2016

  • Tool for Surveillance or Spotlight on Inequality? Big Data and the Law

    Open Access•R A Johnson, Tanina Rostain•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2020

  • Legal Discrimination

    Open Access•Lauren B Edelman, Aaron C Smyth et al.•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2016

  • The Dispute Tree and the Legal Forest

    Catherine R Albiston, Lauren B Edelman et al.•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2014

  • The construction of workers’ rights consciousness through legal intermediations

    Open Access•A Lejeune, Jean-François Orianne•International Journal of…•2014

  • Performing Artivism

    Open Access•Di Wang, Sida Liu•Law & Social Inquiry•2020

  • Institutional and Political Sources of Legislative Change

    Open Access•Shauhin Talesh, Shauhin A Talesh•Law & Social Inquiry•2014

  • Litigation Dilemmas

    Open Access•Nate Ela•Law & Social Inquiry•2016

  • Law Enforcement as Legal Mobilization

    Open Access•Paul Nolette•Law & Social Inquiry•2014

  • When “Best Practices” Win, Employees Lose

    Open Access•Linda H Krieger, Rachel Kahn Best et al.•Law & Social Inquiry•2015

  • Learning to Dispute

    Open Access•Joseph A Conti•Law & Social Inquiry•2010

  • Inside the Pyramid of Disputes

    Kitty Calavita, Valerie Jenne•Social Problems•2013

  • The Intuitive Psychologist Behind the Bench

    Open Access•Linda H Krieger•Journal of Social Issues•2004

  • Interest Groups in the Israeli High Court of Justice

    Open Access•Yoav Dotan, Menachem Hofnung•Law & Policy•2001

  • Settling for Less? Organizational Determinants of Discrimination-Charge Outcomes

    Open Access•C Elizabeth Hirsh•Law & Society Review•2008

  • Institutions Are Not Rules

    Open Access•Henrique A Castro•Political Studies•2024

  • The Privatization of Public Legal Rights

    Open Access•Shauhin Talesh, Shauhin A Talesh•Law & Society Review•2009

  • The Good Case

    Open Access•Joseph A Conti•Law & Society Review•2008

  • Using court documents as data

    Open Access•Anya Degenshein, C A Leslie•Law & Society Review•2025

  • Multiple Disadvantages

    Open Access•Rachel Kahn Best, Lauren B Edelman et al.•Law & Society Review•2011

  • "The Mechanisms behind Litigation's "Radiating Effects

    Open Access•Celeste L Arrington•Law & Society Review•2019

  • A Classic at 25

    Open Access•Richard Lempert•Law & Society Review•1999

  • Family Gatherings and a Dirty Little Secret of the Law and Society Association

    Open Access•Kenneth G Dau-Schmidt, Kenneth G Dau‐schmidt•Law & Society Review•1999

  • How Dispute Resolution System Design Matters

    Open Access•Shauhin Talesh, Shauhin A Talesh•Law & Society Review•2012

  • The Two Motifs of "Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead" and Its Heirs

    Open Access•Charles R Epp•Law & Society Review•1999

  • Enforcement agencies and an emerging category of law

    Open Access•Amanda K Baumle, A Boutcher et al.•Law & Society Review•2024

  • Do the "Haves" Still Come Out Ahead? Resource Inequalities in Ideological Courts

    Open Access•Yoav Dotan•Law & Society Review•1999

  • Rivers of Law and Contested Terrain

    Open Access•Lauren B Edelman•Law & Society Review•2004

  • Repeat Players, the Law, and Social Change

    Open Access•Annabel Ipsen•Law & Society Review•2020

  • When Organizations Rule

    Lauren B Edelman, Linda H Krieger et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2011

  • The Strength of a Weak Agency

    Nicholas Pedriana, R Stryker•American Journal of Sociology•2004

  • The paradox of victory

    Open Access•B Useem, Jack A Goldstone et al.•Theory and Society•2022

  • Habit and creativity in judges' definition and framing of legal questions

    Open Access•B Robert Owens, Robert B Owens et al.•Theory and Society•2021

  • Law in modern society

    Roberto Mangabeira Unger•Law in modern society•1976

  • Rights at work

    Michael W Mccann•Rights at work•1994

  • On Law in Economy and Society

    Max Weber•On Law in Economy and Society•1967

  • Non-Contractual Relations in Business

    Stewart Macaulay•Sociology of Economic Life•2018

  • Order without Law

    Open Access•Robert C Ellickson•Order Without Law•1991

  • Courts

    Martin Shapiro•Courts•1981

  • Law in Everyday Life

    Austin Sarat, Thomas Kearns et al.•Law in Everyday Life (The Amherst…•1993

  • Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law

    Robert H Mnookin, Lewis A Kornhauser et al.•The Yale Law Journal•1979

  • Against Settlement

    Owen M Fiss•The Yale Law Journal•1984

  • The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation

    Abram Chayes•Harvard Law Review•1976

  • The Selection of Disputes for Litigation

    Open Access•George L Priest, Benjamin Klein•The Journal of Legal Studies•1984

  • Why People Obey the Law

    T R Tyler•Why People Obey the Law•2006

  • The alchemy of race and rights

    Open Access•Ann Munster•Journal of Criminal Justice•1992

  • The Legal System

    Open Access•Donald M Roper•Political Science Quarterly•1976

  • Trying to Make Law Matter

    Daniel S Lev, Kathryn Hendley•The American Journal of…•1996

  • The Hollow Hope

    Gerald N Rosenberg•The Hollow Hope•1993

  • The politics of rights

    Stuart A Scheingold, Stuart Scheingold•The politics of rights•2004

  • The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court Justices

    Jeffrey A Segal, Harold J Spaeth•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals

    Donald R Songer, Reginald S Sheehan•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • The Hierarchy of Justice

    Donald R Songer, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • The Mobilization of Law

    Open Access•Donald J Black, Donald Black•The Journal of Legal Studies•1973

  • Non-Contractual Relations in Business

    Stewart Macaulay•American Sociological Review•1963

  • The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes

    Open Access•William L F Felstiner, Richard L Abel et al.•Law & Society Review•1981

  • Studying the Iceberg from its Tip

    Open Access•Peter Siegelman, John J Donohue•Law & Society Review•1990

  • Grievances, Claims, and Disputes

    Open Access•Rebecca E Miller, Richard E Miller et al.•Law & Society Review•1981

  • The Public Ordering of Private Relations Part Two

    Open Access•Craig Wanner•Law & Society Review•1975

  • Making Law at The Doorway

    Open Access•Barbara Yngvesson•Law & Society Review•1988

  • On the Meaning and Pattern of Legal Citations

    Open Access•David Walsh, David J Walsh•Law & Society Review•1997

  • Rights, Remembrance, and the Reconciliation of Difference

    Open Access•David M Engel, Frank W Munger•Law & Society Review•1996

  • Equal Employment Opportunity and the Mobilization of Law

    Open Access•Paul Burstein, Kathleen Monaghan•Law & Society Review•1986

  • Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead

    Open Access•M Galanter•Law & Society Review•1974

  • Participation and Flexibility in Informal Processes

    Open Access•Howard S Erlanger, Elizabeth Chambli et al.•Law & Society Review•1987

  • Afterword

    Open Access•M Galanter•Law & Society Review•1975

  • Internal Dispute Resolution

    Open Access•Lauren B Edelman, Howard S Erlanger et al.•Law & Society Review•1993

  • Do The "Haves" Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870-1970

    Open Access•Stanton Wheeler, Bliss Cartwright et al.•Law & Society Review•1987

  • Legal Mobilization

    Open Access•Frances Kahn Zemans•American Political Science Review•1983

  • Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic

    Paul Burstein•American Journal of Sociology•1991

  • Civil Rights Law at Work

    Erin Kelly, Erin L Kelly et al.•American Journal of Sociology•1999

Unique citing works47
Citations per year1,74
Citation span1999 - 2025 (27)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 47

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae