How Dispute Resolution System Design Matters
An Organizational Analysis of Dispute Resolution Structures and Consumer Lemon Laws
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4085014 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shauhin Talesh (0000-0002-5839-241X, University of California, Irvine, corresponding author), Shauhin A Talesh |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 463-496 |
| Publication date | 2012-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Law & Society Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00503.x |
| OpenAlex | W1928907568 |
| Language | DE |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 52 |
This study demonstrates how the structure of dispute resolution shapes the extent to which managerial and business values influence the meaning and implementation of consumer protection law, and consequently, the extent to which repeat players are advantaged. My analysis draws from, links, and contributes to two literatures that examine the relationship between organizational governance structures and law: neo-institutional studies of law and organizations and socio-legal studies of repeat players' advantages in disputing. Specifically, I compare an instance where powerful state consumer protection laws are resolved in private dispute resolution forums funded by automobile manufacturers but operated by independent third-party organizations (California) with one where consumer disputes are resolved in public alternative dispute resolution processes run and administered by the state (Vermont). Through in-depth interviews and participant observation in the training programs that dispute resolution arbitrators undergo in each state, I show how different dispute resolution structures operating in California and Vermont give different meanings to substantially similar lemon laws. Although my data do not allow me to establish a causal relationship, they strongly suggest that theformof the dispute resolution structure, and how business and state actors construct the meaning of lemon laws through these structures, have critical implications for the effectiveness of consumer protection laws for consumers
Alternative dispute resolution · Business · Corporate governance · Dispute mechanism · Dispute resolution · Economics · Law and economics · Management · Online dispute resolution · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science · Computer Science · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Regulation and Compliance Studies
Constructing Intercultural Selves
The compliance game
The Dispute Tree and the Legal Forest
Institutional and Political Sources of Legislative Change
Symbolic ambivalence
Constructing Compliance, Institutionalizing Creative Solutions
Metacontexts and Cross-Contextual Communication
Risky climate
The devil is in the details
Rule‐Intermediaries in Action
Beyond Endogeneity
Legal Intermediaries
The Law-Before
The Differential Management of Financial Illegalisms
Citizenship in the shadow of law
Tort tales and total justice
The Language of Law School
Responsive Regulation
Enforced Self-Regulation
The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields
Analytic Ethnography
Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes
War and Peace
Do the “Haves” Come Out Ahead over Time? Applying Galanter's Framework to Decisions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 1925-1988
Repeat Players in the Supreme Court
Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals
Why the “Haves” Do Not Necessarily Come Out Ahead in Informal Dispute Resolution
Non-Contractual Relations in Business
Why Not Equal Protection? Explaining the Politics of Public Social Spending in Britain, 1900-1911, and the United States, 1880s-1920
The Iron Cage Revisited
Professional Construction of Law
The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes
The Privatization of Public Legal Rights
Competing Institutions
Which "Haves" Come Out Ahead and Why? Cultural Capital and Legal Mobilization in Frontline Law Enforcement
Social movements, field frames and industry emergence
The Newspaper Ombudsman and Consumer Complaints
A Classic at 25
The Rule of Law and the Litigation Process
Settling for Less? Organizational Determinants of Discrimination-Charge Outcomes
The Impact of Legal Counsel on Outcomes for Poor Tenants in New York City's Housing Court
When the "Haves" Hold Court
Idle Rights
DoestheLawyer Matter? Influencing Outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada
Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead
Do the "Haves" Still Come Out Ahead? Resource Inequalities in Ideological Courts
Internal Dispute Resolution
Do The "Haves" Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870-1970
Employing Bureaucracy
Shadow Justice
Attacking Sex Discrimination in the Labor Market
Access to Civil Justice and Race, Class, and Gender Inequality
When Organizations Rule
Diversity Rhetoric and the Managerialization of Law
The Legalization of the Workplace
Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures
Legal Environments and Organizational Governance
Institutionalized Organizations
The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,33 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |