Helga Kuhse
Biographic Data
| ID | 1607553 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Helga Kuhse |
| GIVEN NAMES | Helga |
| FAMILY NAME | Kuhse |
| SIGNATURE | KUHSE H |
| AFFILIATIONS | Monash University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 29 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1990 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2010 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Companion to Bioethics
A Companion to Bioethics
Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going
Challenging the Conception of Care in Nursing
Reconciling Impartial Morality and a Feminist Ethic of Care
William Godwin and the Defence of Impartialist Ethics
Impartialism in ethics has been said to be the common ground shared by both Kantian and utilitarian approaches to ethics. Lawrence Blum describes this common ground as follows: Both views identify morality with a perspective of impartiality, impersonality, objectivity and universality. Both views imply the ‘ubiquity of impartiality” – that our commitments and projects derive their legitimacy only by reference to this impartial perspective
Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism
The Fears of the Dying
Zwischen Leben entscheiden
We examine the view that all human life is of equal worth or sanctity. We find that this view is a legacy of the Judeo- Christian tradition, and cannot be justified in non - religious terms. We therefore argue that it should be rejected, and that we should openly acknowledge that some Jives are of less worth than others. We then consider a common objection: that this will lead us down a slippery slope to Nazi- style atrocities. We give our reason…
Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism
William Godwin and the Defence of Impartialist Ethics
Impartialism in ethics has been said to be the common ground shared by both Kantian and utilitarian approaches to ethics. Lawrence Blum describes this common ground as follows: Both views identify morality with a perspective of impartiality, impersonality, objectivity and universality. Both views imply the ‘ubiquity of impartiality” – that our commitments and projects derive their legitimacy only by reference to this impartial perspective
Zwischen Leben entscheiden
We examine the view that all human life is of equal worth or sanctity. We find that this view is a legacy of the Judeo- Christian tradition, and cannot be justified in non - religious terms. We therefore argue that it should be rejected, and that we should openly acknowledge that some Jives are of less worth than others. We then consider a common objection: that this will lead us down a slippery slope to Nazi- style atrocities. We give our reason…
The Fears of the Dying
William Godwin and the Defence of Impartialist Ethics
Impartialism in ethics has been said to be the common ground shared by both Kantian and utilitarian approaches to ethics. Lawrence Blum describes this common ground as follows: Both views identify morality with a perspective of impartiality, impersonality, objectivity and universality. Both views imply the ‘ubiquity of impartiality” – that our commitments and projects derive their legitimacy only by reference to this impartial perspective
Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism
Challenging the Conception of Care in Nursing
Reconciling Impartial Morality and a Feminist Ethic of Care
Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going
A Companion to Bioethics
Companion to Bioethics
Political science (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Ethics in medical practice (2 works) · Medicine (2 works)