Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

William Godwin and the Defence of Impartialist Ethics

Bibliographic Data

ID12228407
AuthorsPeter Singer (0000-0003-3741-4314, corresponding author), Leslie Cannold, Helga Kuhse
Year1995
Volume7
Issue1
Pages67-86
Publication date1995-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUtilitas (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0953-8208 • E-ISSN: 1741-6183
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0953820800001850
OpenAlexW2162451849
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited21

Impartialism in ethics has been said to be the common ground shared by both Kantian and utilitarian approaches to ethics. Lawrence Blum describes this common ground as follows: Both views identify morality with a perspective of impartiality, impersonality, objectivity and universality. Both views imply the ‘ubiquity of impartiality” – that our commitments and projects derive their legitimacy only by reference to this impartial perspective

Common ground · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Impartiality · Legitimacy · Morality · Normative ethics · Objectivity (philosophy · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Sociology · Universality (dynamical systems · Computer Science · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education

  • Elizabeth Hamilton’s Memoirs of Modern Philosophers as a philosophical text

    Deborah Boyle•British Journal for the History…•2021

  • The Passions and the Imagination in Wollstonecraft's Theory of Moral Judgement

    Open Access•Karen Green•Utilitas•1997

  • For and Against Ownership

    Open Access•Ramdas Lamb, Robert Lamb•The Review of Politics•2009

  • Friendship, altruism and morality

    Lawrence A Blum•Friendship, altruism and morality•1982

  • Ethics

    J L Mackie•Ethics•1977

  • The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories

    Michael Stocker, Inc The Journal Of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•1976

  • Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection

    Frank Jackson•Ethics•1991

  • Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality (1984)

    Open Access•Peter Railton•Facts, Values, and Norms•2003

  • VI.—Utilitarianism, Universalisation, and Our Duty to be Just

    John Harrison•Proceedings of the Aristotelian…•1953

  • The Sovereignty of Good

    Iris Murdoch•The Sovereignty of Good•2023

  • Utilitarianism

    Bernard Williams, J J C Smart•Utilitarianism•2013

  • Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism

    David Lyons•Forms and limits of utilitarianism.•1965

  • Reasons and Persons

    Derek Parfit•Reasons and persons•1986

  • Friendship, Altruism, and Morality

    Laurence Thomas, Lawrence Blum et al.•The Philosophical Review•1983

  • Godwin's Moral Philosophy

    D Daiches Raphael, D H Monro•The Philosophical Quarterly•1954

  • The Rejection of Consequentialism

    Samuel Scheffler•Rejection of Consequentialism•1984

  • In a different voice

    Carol Gilligan, Carol Gilliagan•In a Different Voice•1993

Citations per year0.1
Citation span1997 - 2021 (25)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae