Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

James S Uleman

Biographic Data

ID165019
NAMEJames S Uleman
GIVEN NAMESJames S
FAMILY NAMEUleman
SIGNATUREULEMAN J S
AFFILIATIONSNew York University
ORCID0000-0001-8805-705X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS32
TOTAL CITATIONS421
AUTHOR COUNT30
EDITOR COUNT2
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1968
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX11
  • The Cross‐Cultural Interplay of Visual Attention and Artistic Design in Comics: Insights From Eye‐Tracking Evidence on American and Japanese Readers

    Open Access•Yuki Shimizu, Motohiro Kozawa et al.•ARTICLE•Cognitive Science•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 25

    This study investigated cross‐cultural differences in visual attention patterns during comic reading, focusing on participants with Japanese and American cultural backgrounds. Using an eye‐tracking paradigm, we examined attention processes as participants viewed pages from American comics and Japanese manga featuring objective or subjective viewpoints. The results showed that for objective pages, American readers exhibited relatively longer fixat…

  • Attention allocation is a possible mediator of cultural variations in spontaneous trait and situation inferences: Eye-tracking evidence

    Open Access•Yuki Shimizu, James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 76

    Two studies sought to replicate previous work on cultural differences in the co-occurrence of spontaneous trait (STI) and situation (SSI) inferences, and to examine possible mediators at the individual level. Both studies replicated previous findings of cultural differences. European Americans made more STIs relative to SSIs than did Asian American or Japanese participants. However Experiment 1 found no evidence from the Analysis-Holism Scale (AH…

  • The Influence of Maternal Socialization on Infants’ Social Evaluation in Two Cultures

    Open Access•Yuki Shimizu, Sawa Senzaki et al.•ARTICLE•Infancy•2018

    Although a growing body of research has explored the early development of social evaluation, no research has directly compared social evaluations of infants between different cultures. In addition, there has been little understanding regarding socialization's effects on this ability. The goal of this study was to expand on earlier findings on social evaluation in infants by investigating a broader sample from two cultures, and to explore the infl…

  • Social and biological intergroup hierarchy beliefs: A cross-cultural comparison between the US and South Korea

    Open Access•Hyeyoung Shin, John F Dovidio et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2018•Cited by: 2•References: 13

    The present research investigated social and biological intergroup hierarchy beliefs in the US and South Korea, representative Northern European-heritage and East Asian cultures, respectively. We hypothesized that individual-orientation (the emphasis on individuals and individual achievements) and group-orientation (the emphasis on groups and efficient functioning of groups) would predict social and biological hierarchy beliefs differently within…

  • Cultural Differences in Spontaneous Trait and Situation Inferences

    Open Access•Hajin Lee, Yuki Shimizu et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•2017•Cited by: 5•References: 63

    Previous findings indicated that when people observe someone's behavior, they spontaneously infer the traits and situations that cause the target person's behavior. These inference processes are called spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) and spontaneous situation inferences (SSIs). While both patterns of inferences have been observed, no research has examined the extent to which people from different cultural backgrounds produce these inferences …

  • Culture as automatic processes for making meaning: Spontaneous trait inferences

    Open Access•Yuki Shimizu, Hajin Lee et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2016•Cited by: 7•References: 43

  • The causality implicit in traits

    Open Access•Laura M Kressel, James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2014•Cited by: 5•References: 19

  • A Brief History of Theory and Research on Impression Formation

    James S Uleman, James Uleman et al.•BOOK•Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition•2013

    Why do we view people as we do? What is scientifically tractable, in that view? How did subjective concepts such as traits become legitimate “objects of perception”? Thorndike, Asch, and Cronbach were critical. This chapter traces Asch’s legacy to the present and describes the strange independence of research on accuracy from social cognition. Impressions’ internal organization (not accuracy) became the foundation of research on the Big Two (warm…

  • Seeing others through rose-colored glasses: An affiliation goal and positivity bias in implicit trait impressions

    Open Access•Soyon Rim, Kate E Min et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 28

  • Primed Self-Construal, Culture, and Stages of Impression Formation

    A Saribay, Soyon Rim et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychology•2012•Cited by: 1•References: 21

    The effects of culture on impression formation are widely documented but poorly understood. Priming independent and interdependent self-construals, and focusing on particular stages of impression formation, could help remedy this because such self-construals differ across cultures. In three experiments, participants' were primed with independent or interdependent self-construals before they formed spontaneous or intentional impressions of others.…

  • On the relation between spontaneous trait inferences and intentional inferences: An inference monitoring hypothesis

    Open Access•Mário B Ferreira, Leonel Garcia-Marques et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2011•Cited by: 7•References: 51

  • Personality traits function as causal concepts

    Open Access•Laura M Kressel, James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009•Cited by: 9•References: 11

  • Spontaneous trait inference and construal level theory: Psychological distance increases nonconscious trait thinking

    Open Access•Soyon Rim, James S Uleman et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009•Cited by: 22•References: 38

  • Spontaneous Inferences, Implicit Impressions, and Implicit Theories

    James S Uleman, A Saribay et al.•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Psychology•2008

    People make social inferences without intentions, awareness, or effort, i.e., spontaneously. We review recent findings on spontaneous social inferences (especially traits, goals, and causes) and closely related phenomena. We then describe current thinking on some of the most relevant processes, implicit knowledge, and theories. These include automatic and controlled processes and their interplay; embodied cognition, including mimicry; and associa…

  • The New Unconscious

    Ran R Hassin, James S Uleman et al.•BOOK•The New Unconscious (Social…•2006

    Introduction: Becoming Aware of the New Unconscious JAMES S. ULEMAN PART I FUNDAMENTAL QUESTIONS 1. Who is the Controller of Controlled Processes? 2. Bypassing the Will: Towards Demystifying the Nonconscious Control of Social Behavior PART II BASIC MECHANISMS 3. The Interaction of Emotion and Cognition: The Relation Between the Human Amygdala and Cognitive Awareness 4. The Power of the Subliminal: On Subliminal Persuasion and Other Potential Appl…

  • The new unconscious

    Ran R Hassin, James S Uleman et al.•BOOK•The new unconscious•2005

    Over the past two decades, a new picture of the unconscious has emerged from a variety of disciplines that are broadly part of cognitive science. According to this picture, unconscious processes seem to be capable of doing many things that were thought to require intention, deliberation, and conscious awareness. Moreover, they accomplish these things without the conflict and drama of the psychoanalytic unconscious. These processes range from comp…

  • The Person Reference Process in Spontaneous Trait Inferences

    Antony Todorov, James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2004•Cited by: 19•References: 8

    Five studies examined whether spontaneous trait inferences uniquely reference the person who performed a trait-implying behavior. On each study trial in 5 studies, participants saw 2 faces and a behavioral sentence referring to one of them. Later, participants saw face-trait pairs and indicated whether they had seen the trait word in the sentence presented with the face. Participants falsely recognized implied traits more when these traits were p…

  • The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors’ faces

    Open Access•Antony Todorov, Alexander Todorov et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2003•Cited by: 38•References: 19

  • Spontaneous causal inferences

    Open Access•Ran R Hassin, John A Bargh et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2002•Cited by: 17•References: 21

  • Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors' faces: Evidence from a false recognition paradigm

    Antony Todorov, Alexander Todorov et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2002•Cited by: 32•References: 22

    A false recognition paradigm showed that spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) are bound to the person performing a trait-implying behavior. In 6 experiments, participants memorized faces and behavioral sentences. When faces were paired with implied traits in a recognition test, participants falsely recognized these traits more often than unrelated traits paired with the same faces or the same traits paired with familiar faces. The effect was obtai…

  • People as Flexible Interpreters: Evidence and Issues from Spontaneous Trait Inference

    James S Uleman, Leonard S Newman et al.•CHAPTER•Advances in Experimental Social…•1996

  • Variations in collectivism and individualism by ingroup and culture: Confirmatory factor analysis

    Eun Rhee, Eun‐Jung Rhee et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1996•Cited by: 45

  • Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures

    Eun Rhee, Eun‐Jung Rhee et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1995•Cited by: 52

    The Twenty Statements Test (TST) was administered in Seoul and New York, to 454 students from 2 cultures that emphasize collectivism and individualism, respectively. Responses, coded into 33 categories, were classified as either abstract or specific and as either autonomous or social. These 2 dichotomies were more independent in Seoul than in New York. The New York sample included Asian American whose spontaneous social identities differed. They …

  • Unintended effects of goals on unintended inferences

    James S Uleman, Gordon B Moskowitz•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1994•Cited by: 17

    Three studies investigated unintended effects of goals on spontaneous trait inferences (STIs). Ss read trait-implying sentences to memorize them, to analyze sentence features, or to make social judgments. Cued recall revealed unintended (spontaneous) trait and behavioral-gist inferences. They were equally frequent with all the social judgment goals and absent or infrequent with feature analysis goals. Memorizing the sentences while ignoring their…

  • Can personality traits be inferred automatically? Spontaneous inferences require cognitive capacity at encoding

    Open Access•James S Uleman, Leonard S Newman et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•1992

Next
  • When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences

    Laraine Winter, James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1984•Cited by: 70

    Do people make trait inferences, even without intentions or instructions, at the encoding stage of processing behavioral information? Tulving's encoding specificity paradigm (Tulving & Thomson, 1973) was adapted for two recall experiments. Under memory instructions only, subjects read sentences describing people performing actions that implied traits. Later, subjects recalled each sentence under one of three cuing conditions: (a) a dispositional …

  • Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures

    Eun Rhee, Eun‐Jung Rhee et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1995•Cited by: 52

    The Twenty Statements Test (TST) was administered in Seoul and New York, to 454 students from 2 cultures that emphasize collectivism and individualism, respectively. Responses, coded into 33 categories, were classified as either abstract or specific and as either autonomous or social. These 2 dichotomies were more independent in Seoul than in New York. The New York sample included Asian American whose spontaneous social identities differed. They …

  • Variations in collectivism and individualism by ingroup and culture: Confirmatory factor analysis

    Eun Rhee, Eun‐Jung Rhee et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1996•Cited by: 45

  • The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors’ faces

    Open Access•Antony Todorov, Alexander Todorov et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2003•Cited by: 38•References: 19

  • Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors' faces: Evidence from a false recognition paradigm

    Antony Todorov, Alexander Todorov et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2002•Cited by: 32•References: 22

    A false recognition paradigm showed that spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) are bound to the person performing a trait-implying behavior. In 6 experiments, participants memorized faces and behavioral sentences. When faces were paired with implied traits in a recognition test, participants falsely recognized these traits more often than unrelated traits paired with the same faces or the same traits paired with familiar faces. The effect was obtai…

  • How automatic are social judgments

    Laraine Winter, James S Uleman et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1985•Cited by: 30

    Do people infer personality dispositions automatically when they encode behavior? Tulving's encoding-specificity paradigm was adapted to test three operational indicants of automatism: absence of intention, of interference from other mental activity, and of awareness. Recruited for a digit-recall study, subjects read sentences describing actions during the retention interval of either an easy or a difficult digit recall task. Later, sentence reca…

  • Spontaneous trait inference and construal level theory: Psychological distance increases nonconscious trait thinking

    Open Access•Soyon Rim, James S Uleman et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009•Cited by: 22•References: 38

  • Measurement and interpretation of situational and dispositional attributions

    Open Access•Frederick D Miller, Eliot R Smith et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•1981•Cited by: 22•References: 14

  • The Person Reference Process in Spontaneous Trait Inferences

    Antony Todorov, James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2004•Cited by: 19•References: 8

    Five studies examined whether spontaneous trait inferences uniquely reference the person who performed a trait-implying behavior. On each study trial in 5 studies, participants saw 2 faces and a behavioral sentence referring to one of them. Later, participants saw face-trait pairs and indicated whether they had seen the trait word in the sentence presented with the face. Participants falsely recognized implied traits more when these traits were p…

  • Spontaneous causal inferences

    Open Access•Ran R Hassin, John A Bargh et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2002•Cited by: 17•References: 21

  • Unintended effects of goals on unintended inferences

    James S Uleman, Gordon B Moskowitz•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1994•Cited by: 17

    Three studies investigated unintended effects of goals on spontaneous trait inferences (STIs). Ss read trait-implying sentences to memorize them, to analyze sentence features, or to make social judgments. Cued recall revealed unintended (spontaneous) trait and behavioral-gist inferences. They were equally frequent with all the social judgment goals and absent or infrequent with feature analysis goals. Memorizing the sentences while ignoring their…

  • Personality traits function as causal concepts

    Open Access•Laura M Kressel, James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009•Cited by: 9•References: 11

  • Culture as automatic processes for making meaning: Spontaneous trait inferences

    Open Access•Yuki Shimizu, Hajin Lee et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2016•Cited by: 7•References: 43

  • On the relation between spontaneous trait inferences and intentional inferences: An inference monitoring hypothesis

    Open Access•Mário B Ferreira, Leonel Garcia-Marques et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2011•Cited by: 7•References: 51

  • Personality differences in spontaneous personality inferences at encoding

    James S Uleman, Wayne C Winborne et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986•Cited by: 7

    In this article, a method is described for studying personality differences in the spontaneous encoding of complex information about others, and is illustrated in a study of authoritarianism (F). Two sets of sentences were developed in pretesting. In the first set, events suggested a consensual disposition for each sentence actor to either high F (HF) or low F (LF) subjects. In the second set, events suggested a different consensual disposition t…

  • Does the BSRI inventory sex roles

    Open Access•James S Uleman, Martha Weston•ARTICLE•Sex Roles•1986•Cited by: 6•References: 6

  • Cultural Differences in Spontaneous Trait and Situation Inferences

    Open Access•Hajin Lee, Yuki Shimizu et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•2017•Cited by: 5•References: 63

    Previous findings indicated that when people observe someone's behavior, they spontaneously infer the traits and situations that cause the target person's behavior. These inference processes are called spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) and spontaneous situation inferences (SSIs). While both patterns of inferences have been observed, no research has examined the extent to which people from different cultural backgrounds produce these inferences …

  • The causality implicit in traits

    Open Access•Laura M Kressel, James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2014•Cited by: 5•References: 19

  • Seeing others through rose-colored glasses: An affiliation goal and positivity bias in implicit trait impressions

    Open Access•Soyon Rim, Kate E Min et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 28

  • Attention allocation is a possible mediator of cultural variations in spontaneous trait and situation inferences: Eye-tracking evidence

    Open Access•Yuki Shimizu, James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 76

    Two studies sought to replicate previous work on cultural differences in the co-occurrence of spontaneous trait (STI) and situation (SSI) inferences, and to examine possible mediators at the individual level. Both studies replicated previous findings of cultural differences. European Americans made more STIs relative to SSIs than did Asian American or Japanese participants. However Experiment 1 found no evidence from the Analysis-Holism Scale (AH…

  • Social and biological intergroup hierarchy beliefs: A cross-cultural comparison between the US and South Korea

    Open Access•Hyeyoung Shin, John F Dovidio et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2018•Cited by: 2•References: 13

    The present research investigated social and biological intergroup hierarchy beliefs in the US and South Korea, representative Northern European-heritage and East Asian cultures, respectively. We hypothesized that individual-orientation (the emphasis on individuals and individual achievements) and group-orientation (the emphasis on groups and efficient functioning of groups) would predict social and biological hierarchy beliefs differently within…

  • The Cross‐Cultural Interplay of Visual Attention and Artistic Design in Comics: Insights From Eye‐Tracking Evidence on American and Japanese Readers

    Open Access•Yuki Shimizu, Motohiro Kozawa et al.•ARTICLE•Cognitive Science•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 25

    This study investigated cross‐cultural differences in visual attention patterns during comic reading, focusing on participants with Japanese and American cultural backgrounds. Using an eye‐tracking paradigm, we examined attention processes as participants viewed pages from American comics and Japanese manga featuring objective or subjective viewpoints. The results showed that for objective pages, American readers exhibited relatively longer fixat…

  • Primed Self-Construal, Culture, and Stages of Impression Formation

    A Saribay, Soyon Rim et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychology•2012•Cited by: 1•References: 21

    The effects of culture on impression formation are widely documented but poorly understood. Priming independent and interdependent self-construals, and focusing on particular stages of impression formation, could help remedy this because such self-construals differ across cultures. In three experiments, participants' were primed with independent or interdependent self-construals before they formed spontaneous or intentional impressions of others.…

  • A nonparametric comparison of two small samples with many ties

    James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1968

  • Recall of Initial Response, Probability Scale Meaning, and the Group-Shift Effect

    Open Access•Marsha B Jacobson, James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1976

    The results of three studies are reported in which male and female subjects responded to risk and caution life-dilemma problems in either a standard discussion or a control procedure. Exp. 1 showed that subjects' recall of their initial positions shifted to match their final positions but only on risk dilemmas. Exp. 2 reconstructed subjects' recall of their initial positions from their perceived shift and found that subjects' reconstructed recall…

  • Measurement and interpretation of situational and dispositional attributions

    Open Access•Frederick D Miller, Eliot R Smith et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•1981•Cited by: 22•References: 14

  • When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences

    Laraine Winter, James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1984•Cited by: 70

    Do people make trait inferences, even without intentions or instructions, at the encoding stage of processing behavioral information? Tulving's encoding specificity paradigm (Tulving & Thomson, 1973) was adapted for two recall experiments. Under memory instructions only, subjects read sentences describing people performing actions that implied traits. Later, subjects recalled each sentence under one of three cuing conditions: (a) a dispositional …

  • How automatic are social judgments

    Laraine Winter, James S Uleman et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1985•Cited by: 30

    Do people infer personality dispositions automatically when they encode behavior? Tulving's encoding-specificity paradigm was adapted to test three operational indicants of automatism: absence of intention, of interference from other mental activity, and of awareness. Recruited for a digit-recall study, subjects read sentences describing actions during the retention interval of either an easy or a difficult digit recall task. Later, sentence reca…

  • Does the BSRI inventory sex roles

    Open Access•James S Uleman, Martha Weston•ARTICLE•Sex Roles•1986•Cited by: 6•References: 6

  • Personality differences in spontaneous personality inferences at encoding

    James S Uleman, Wayne C Winborne et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986•Cited by: 7

    In this article, a method is described for studying personality differences in the spontaneous encoding of complex information about others, and is illustrated in a study of authoritarianism (F). Two sets of sentences were developed in pretesting. In the first set, events suggested a consensual disposition for each sentence actor to either high F (HF) or low F (LF) subjects. In the second set, events suggested a different consensual disposition t…

  • Can personality traits be inferred automatically? Spontaneous inferences require cognitive capacity at encoding

    Open Access•James S Uleman, Leonard S Newman et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•1992

  • Unintended effects of goals on unintended inferences

    James S Uleman, Gordon B Moskowitz•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1994•Cited by: 17

    Three studies investigated unintended effects of goals on spontaneous trait inferences (STIs). Ss read trait-implying sentences to memorize them, to analyze sentence features, or to make social judgments. Cued recall revealed unintended (spontaneous) trait and behavioral-gist inferences. They were equally frequent with all the social judgment goals and absent or infrequent with feature analysis goals. Memorizing the sentences while ignoring their…

  • Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures

    Eun Rhee, Eun‐Jung Rhee et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1995•Cited by: 52

    The Twenty Statements Test (TST) was administered in Seoul and New York, to 454 students from 2 cultures that emphasize collectivism and individualism, respectively. Responses, coded into 33 categories, were classified as either abstract or specific and as either autonomous or social. These 2 dichotomies were more independent in Seoul than in New York. The New York sample included Asian American whose spontaneous social identities differed. They …

  • People as Flexible Interpreters: Evidence and Issues from Spontaneous Trait Inference

    James S Uleman, Leonard S Newman et al.•CHAPTER•Advances in Experimental Social…•1996

  • Variations in collectivism and individualism by ingroup and culture: Confirmatory factor analysis

    Eun Rhee, Eun‐Jung Rhee et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1996•Cited by: 45

  • Spontaneous causal inferences

    Open Access•Ran R Hassin, John A Bargh et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2002•Cited by: 17•References: 21

  • Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors' faces: Evidence from a false recognition paradigm

    Antony Todorov, Alexander Todorov et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2002•Cited by: 32•References: 22

    A false recognition paradigm showed that spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) are bound to the person performing a trait-implying behavior. In 6 experiments, participants memorized faces and behavioral sentences. When faces were paired with implied traits in a recognition test, participants falsely recognized these traits more often than unrelated traits paired with the same faces or the same traits paired with familiar faces. The effect was obtai…

  • The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors’ faces

    Open Access•Antony Todorov, Alexander Todorov et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2003•Cited by: 38•References: 19

  • The Person Reference Process in Spontaneous Trait Inferences

    Antony Todorov, James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2004•Cited by: 19•References: 8

    Five studies examined whether spontaneous trait inferences uniquely reference the person who performed a trait-implying behavior. On each study trial in 5 studies, participants saw 2 faces and a behavioral sentence referring to one of them. Later, participants saw face-trait pairs and indicated whether they had seen the trait word in the sentence presented with the face. Participants falsely recognized implied traits more when these traits were p…

  • The new unconscious

    Ran R Hassin, James S Uleman et al.•BOOK•The new unconscious•2005

    Over the past two decades, a new picture of the unconscious has emerged from a variety of disciplines that are broadly part of cognitive science. According to this picture, unconscious processes seem to be capable of doing many things that were thought to require intention, deliberation, and conscious awareness. Moreover, they accomplish these things without the conflict and drama of the psychoanalytic unconscious. These processes range from comp…

  • The New Unconscious

    Ran R Hassin, James S Uleman et al.•BOOK•The New Unconscious (Social…•2006

    Introduction: Becoming Aware of the New Unconscious JAMES S. ULEMAN PART I FUNDAMENTAL QUESTIONS 1. Who is the Controller of Controlled Processes? 2. Bypassing the Will: Towards Demystifying the Nonconscious Control of Social Behavior PART II BASIC MECHANISMS 3. The Interaction of Emotion and Cognition: The Relation Between the Human Amygdala and Cognitive Awareness 4. The Power of the Subliminal: On Subliminal Persuasion and Other Potential Appl…

  • Spontaneous Inferences, Implicit Impressions, and Implicit Theories

    James S Uleman, A Saribay et al.•ARTICLE•Annual Review of Psychology•2008

    People make social inferences without intentions, awareness, or effort, i.e., spontaneously. We review recent findings on spontaneous social inferences (especially traits, goals, and causes) and closely related phenomena. We then describe current thinking on some of the most relevant processes, implicit knowledge, and theories. These include automatic and controlled processes and their interplay; embodied cognition, including mimicry; and associa…

  • Personality traits function as causal concepts

    Open Access•Laura M Kressel, James S Uleman•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009•Cited by: 9•References: 11

  • Spontaneous trait inference and construal level theory: Psychological distance increases nonconscious trait thinking

    Open Access•Soyon Rim, James S Uleman et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009•Cited by: 22•References: 38

  • On the relation between spontaneous trait inferences and intentional inferences: An inference monitoring hypothesis

    Open Access•Mário B Ferreira, Leonel Garcia-Marques et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2011•Cited by: 7•References: 51

  • Primed Self-Construal, Culture, and Stages of Impression Formation

    A Saribay, Soyon Rim et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychology•2012•Cited by: 1•References: 21

    The effects of culture on impression formation are widely documented but poorly understood. Priming independent and interdependent self-construals, and focusing on particular stages of impression formation, could help remedy this because such self-construals differ across cultures. In three experiments, participants' were primed with independent or interdependent self-construals before they formed spontaneous or intentional impressions of others.…

  • A Brief History of Theory and Research on Impression Formation

    James S Uleman, James Uleman et al.•BOOK•Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition•2013

    Why do we view people as we do? What is scientifically tractable, in that view? How did subjective concepts such as traits become legitimate “objects of perception”? Thorndike, Asch, and Cronbach were critical. This chapter traces Asch’s legacy to the present and describes the strange independence of research on accuracy from social cognition. Impressions’ internal organization (not accuracy) became the foundation of research on the Big Two (warm…

  • Seeing others through rose-colored glasses: An affiliation goal and positivity bias in implicit trait impressions

    Open Access•Soyon Rim, Kate E Min et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 28

Psychology (32 works) · Social Psychology (28 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (23 works) · Cognitive psychology (22 works) · Social Psychology (19 works) · Trait (15 works) · Cultural Differences and Values (14 works) · Computer Science (10 works) · Perception (10 works) · Recall (10 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae