Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Michael Kusch

Biographic Data

ID174178
NAMEMichael Kusch
GIVEN NAMESMichael
FAMILY NAMEKusch
SIGNATUREKUSCH M
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Cambridge
ORCID0000-0003-4570-7272
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS26
TOTAL CITATIONS44
AUTHOR COUNT26
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1988
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX4
  • Why do we argue about the specialness of the social sciences

    Open Access•Anna Alexandrova, Michael Kusch•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2026•References: 23

  • Unity or disunity of the sciences? The German debate around 1900

    Open Access•Michael Kusch•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    This paper gives an overview of the intense and prolonged debates concerning the relationships between the natural, social and historical sciences in German-speaking academia in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In particular, the paper focuses on discussions over cultural history (Schäfer versus Gothein; Buckle and Du Bois-Raymond versus Droysen and Lorenz; von Below versus Lamprecht); the position of psychology (Steinthal, Laza…

  • Speechlessness: A Conceptual Framework

    Open Access•Thilo Dietz, Vera Schiewer et al.•ARTICLE•Integrative Psychological and…•2024•References: 106

    The phenomenon of speechlessness has hardly been considered in the literature from a psychological point of view. Previous research on speechlessness is limited to the fields of neurology, medicine or psychopathology. The present review aims to consider speechlessness from a psychological perspective distinct from pathology, and to highlight its observability and possible connections to existing research in the context of emotional cognition and …

  • Cologne questionnaire on speechlessness: Development and validation

    Open Access•Thilo Dietz, Sally Tavenrath et al.•ARTICLE•Current Psychology•2023

    Speechlessness forms a psychological concept that describes non-speaking or silence in different situations. Speechlessness occurs in particular during emotional stress. The Cologne Questionnaire on Speechlessness (ger.: Kölner Fragebogen zur Sprachlosigkeit ) is an instrument for measuring speechlessness as a function of emotional perception and processing in situations of emotional stress or existing emotional dysregulation. The questionnaire w…

  • An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

    Open Access•Lusine Vaganian, Sonja Bussmann et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2021

    Overall, the analysis results according to the Rasch model support the use of the WHODAS 2.0 12-item version as a measure of disability in cancer patients

  • The genealogical method in epistemology

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2020•Cited by: 3•References: 37

    in which he introduced and defended a genealogical approach to epistemology. In recent years Craig's book has attracted a lot of attention, and his distinctive approach has been put to a wide range of uses including anti-realist metaepistemology, contextualism, relativism, anti-luck virtue epistemology, epistemic injustice, value of knowledge, pragmatism and virtue epistemology. While the number of objections to Craig's approach has accumulated, …

  • Georg Simmel and Pragmatism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch•ARTICLE•European Journal of Pragmatism…•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 2

    This paper offers some brief reflections on pragmatist themes in Georg Simmel’s philosophy. §1 presents a number of assessments – by Simmel’s contemporaries, by later interpreters, and by Simmel himself – concerning his proximity to pragmatism. §2 offers a reconstruction of Simmel’s 1885-paper “The Relationship between the Theory of Selection and Epistemology,” focusing in particular on what the argument owed to von Helmholtz. It was this paper f…

  • Summa Contra Scepticos

    Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2018•References: 2

    This critical notice concerns Duncan Pritchard's Epistemic Angst (2016). After a summary of the book, I offer some brief critical comments on five issues: the distinction between overriding and undercutting strategies against scepticism, epistemic relativism, foundationalist hinge epistemology, the relationship between hinge propositions and evidence, and the universality of rational evaluation. Epistemic Angst is Duncan Pritchard's to-date most …

  • Epistemic relativism, scepticism, pluralism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Synthese•2017•Cited by: 8•References: 24

    There are a number of debates that are relevant to questions concerning objectivity in science. One of the eldest, and still one of the most intensely fought, is the debate over epistemic relativism. —All forms of epistemic relativism commit themselves to the view that it is impossible to show in a neutral, non-question-begging, way that one “epistemic system”, that is, one interconnected set of epistemic standards, is epistemically superior to (…

  • Relativism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•OTHER•The Blackwell Encyclopedia of…•2016•Cited by: 1•References: 1

    Various forms of relativism have been central to the social sciences since their inception. It is important to distinguish between different forms of relativism, according to what feature is claimed to be relative and the parameter to which something is said to be relative. Relativism can take descriptive, normative, or methodological forms. There is much disagreement about which theses are central to a relativist position. Frequently cited these…

  • Psychologism, History of

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•CHAPTER•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Annalisa Coliva on Wittgenstein and Epistemic Relativism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•philoSOPHIA•2012•Cited by: 3•References: 4

  • Objectivity and Historiography

    Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Isis•2009•Cited by: 2•References: 2

  • Beliefs, Kinds and Rules: A Comment on Kornblith's Knowledge and Its Place in Nature

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2005•References: 5

  • Reply to my Critics

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•2004•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • Rule-Scepticism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: The Bloor-Lynch Debate Revisited

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•2004•Cited by: 8•References: 5

    This paper revisits the 1992 debate between David Bloor and Michael Lynch over the importance of Wittgenstein’s rule-following considerations for social studies of science. Lynch defended four points: (1) Bloor is committed to a rule-sceptical reading of Wittgenstein; (2) this reading is similar to that proposed by Kripke in 1982; (3) the criticism levelled previously against Kripke also applies to Bloor; (4) the problems besetting Bloor’s rule-s…

  • Hans-Georg Gadamer (1900-2002)

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•History of Psychiatry•2002

  • The Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Maren Kusch et al.•BOOK•Sociology of Philosophical…•2000•Cited by: 8

  • Volkerpsychologie--Versuch einer Neuentdeckung: Texte von Lazarus, Steinthal, und Wundt . Georg Eckardt

    Michael Kusch•ARTICLE•Isis•1999

  • The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do

    H M Collins, Harry Collins et al.•BOOK•The Shape of Actions•1999

    What can humans do? What can machines do? How do humans delegate actions to machines? In this book, Harry Collins and Martin Kusch combine insights from sociology and philosophy to provide a novel answer to these increasingly important questions.The authors begin by distinguishing between two basic types of intentional behavior, which they call polimorphic actions and mimeomorphic actions. Polimorphic actions (such as writing a love letter) are o…

  • Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge

    Robert Hanna, Michael Kusch•REVIEW•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1997

    When did psychology become a distinct discipline? What links the Continental and Analytic traditions in philosophy? Both these questions are answered by this extraordinary account of psychologism in Germany at the turn of the century. Martin Kusch explores the origins of psychologism through the work of two major figures in the history of Twentieth Century philosophy: Gottlob Frege and Edmund Husserl. Using psychological and historical reconstruc…

  • Recluse, Interlocutor, Interrogator: Natural and Social Order in Turn-of-the-Century Psychological Research Schools

    Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Isis•1995•Cited by: 6

  • The Sociological Deconstruction of Philosophical Facts - The Case of Psychologism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Science & Technology Studies•1991

  • Foucault’s Strata and Fields: An Investigation into Archaeological and Genealogical Science Studies

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch et al.•BOOK•Foucault's Strata and Fields•1991

  • Discursive Formations and Possible Worlds - Reconstruction of Foucault's Archeology

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Science & Technology Studies•1989

Next
  • Epistemic relativism, scepticism, pluralism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Synthese•2017•Cited by: 8•References: 24

    There are a number of debates that are relevant to questions concerning objectivity in science. One of the eldest, and still one of the most intensely fought, is the debate over epistemic relativism. —All forms of epistemic relativism commit themselves to the view that it is impossible to show in a neutral, non-question-begging, way that one “epistemic system”, that is, one interconnected set of epistemic standards, is epistemically superior to (…

  • Rule-Scepticism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: The Bloor-Lynch Debate Revisited

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•2004•Cited by: 8•References: 5

    This paper revisits the 1992 debate between David Bloor and Michael Lynch over the importance of Wittgenstein’s rule-following considerations for social studies of science. Lynch defended four points: (1) Bloor is committed to a rule-sceptical reading of Wittgenstein; (2) this reading is similar to that proposed by Kripke in 1982; (3) the criticism levelled previously against Kripke also applies to Bloor; (4) the problems besetting Bloor’s rule-s…

  • The Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Maren Kusch et al.•BOOK•Sociology of Philosophical…•2000•Cited by: 8

  • Recluse, Interlocutor, Interrogator: Natural and Social Order in Turn-of-the-Century Psychological Research Schools

    Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Isis•1995•Cited by: 6

  • The genealogical method in epistemology

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2020•Cited by: 3•References: 37

    in which he introduced and defended a genealogical approach to epistemology. In recent years Craig's book has attracted a lot of attention, and his distinctive approach has been put to a wide range of uses including anti-realist metaepistemology, contextualism, relativism, anti-luck virtue epistemology, epistemic injustice, value of knowledge, pragmatism and virtue epistemology. While the number of objections to Craig's approach has accumulated, …

  • Annalisa Coliva on Wittgenstein and Epistemic Relativism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•philoSOPHIA•2012•Cited by: 3•References: 4

  • Objectivity and Historiography

    Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Isis•2009•Cited by: 2•References: 2

  • Reply to my Critics

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•2004•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • Unity or disunity of the sciences? The German debate around 1900

    Open Access•Michael Kusch•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    This paper gives an overview of the intense and prolonged debates concerning the relationships between the natural, social and historical sciences in German-speaking academia in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In particular, the paper focuses on discussions over cultural history (Schäfer versus Gothein; Buckle and Du Bois-Raymond versus Droysen and Lorenz; von Below versus Lamprecht); the position of psychology (Steinthal, Laza…

  • Georg Simmel and Pragmatism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch•ARTICLE•European Journal of Pragmatism…•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 2

    This paper offers some brief reflections on pragmatist themes in Georg Simmel’s philosophy. §1 presents a number of assessments – by Simmel’s contemporaries, by later interpreters, and by Simmel himself – concerning his proximity to pragmatism. §2 offers a reconstruction of Simmel’s 1885-paper “The Relationship between the Theory of Selection and Epistemology,” focusing in particular on what the argument owed to von Helmholtz. It was this paper f…

  • Relativism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•OTHER•The Blackwell Encyclopedia of…•2016•Cited by: 1•References: 1

    Various forms of relativism have been central to the social sciences since their inception. It is important to distinguish between different forms of relativism, according to what feature is claimed to be relative and the parameter to which something is said to be relative. Relativism can take descriptive, normative, or methodological forms. There is much disagreement about which theses are central to a relativist position. Frequently cited these…

  • Husserl and Heidegger on meaning

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Synthese•1988•Cited by: 1

  • Husserl and Heidegger on meaning

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Synthese•1988•Cited by: 1

  • Discursive Formations and Possible Worlds - Reconstruction of Foucault's Archeology

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Science & Technology Studies•1989

  • The Sociological Deconstruction of Philosophical Facts - The Case of Psychologism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Science & Technology Studies•1991

  • Foucault’s Strata and Fields: An Investigation into Archaeological and Genealogical Science Studies

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch et al.•BOOK•Foucault's Strata and Fields•1991

  • Recluse, Interlocutor, Interrogator: Natural and Social Order in Turn-of-the-Century Psychological Research Schools

    Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Isis•1995•Cited by: 6

  • Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge

    Robert Hanna, Michael Kusch•REVIEW•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1997

    When did psychology become a distinct discipline? What links the Continental and Analytic traditions in philosophy? Both these questions are answered by this extraordinary account of psychologism in Germany at the turn of the century. Martin Kusch explores the origins of psychologism through the work of two major figures in the history of Twentieth Century philosophy: Gottlob Frege and Edmund Husserl. Using psychological and historical reconstruc…

  • Volkerpsychologie--Versuch einer Neuentdeckung: Texte von Lazarus, Steinthal, und Wundt . Georg Eckardt

    Michael Kusch•ARTICLE•Isis•1999

  • The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do

    H M Collins, Harry Collins et al.•BOOK•The Shape of Actions•1999

    What can humans do? What can machines do? How do humans delegate actions to machines? In this book, Harry Collins and Martin Kusch combine insights from sociology and philosophy to provide a novel answer to these increasingly important questions.The authors begin by distinguishing between two basic types of intentional behavior, which they call polimorphic actions and mimeomorphic actions. Polimorphic actions (such as writing a love letter) are o…

  • The Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Maren Kusch et al.•BOOK•Sociology of Philosophical…•2000•Cited by: 8

  • Hans-Georg Gadamer (1900-2002)

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•History of Psychiatry•2002

  • Reply to my Critics

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•2004•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • Rule-Scepticism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: The Bloor-Lynch Debate Revisited

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•2004•Cited by: 8•References: 5

    This paper revisits the 1992 debate between David Bloor and Michael Lynch over the importance of Wittgenstein’s rule-following considerations for social studies of science. Lynch defended four points: (1) Bloor is committed to a rule-sceptical reading of Wittgenstein; (2) this reading is similar to that proposed by Kripke in 1982; (3) the criticism levelled previously against Kripke also applies to Bloor; (4) the problems besetting Bloor’s rule-s…

  • Beliefs, Kinds and Rules: A Comment on Kornblith's Knowledge and Its Place in Nature

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2005•References: 5

  • Objectivity and Historiography

    Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Isis•2009•Cited by: 2•References: 2

  • Annalisa Coliva on Wittgenstein and Epistemic Relativism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•philoSOPHIA•2012•Cited by: 3•References: 4

  • Psychologism, History of

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•CHAPTER•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Relativism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•OTHER•The Blackwell Encyclopedia of…•2016•Cited by: 1•References: 1

    Various forms of relativism have been central to the social sciences since their inception. It is important to distinguish between different forms of relativism, according to what feature is claimed to be relative and the parameter to which something is said to be relative. Relativism can take descriptive, normative, or methodological forms. There is much disagreement about which theses are central to a relativist position. Frequently cited these…

  • Epistemic relativism, scepticism, pluralism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•Synthese•2017•Cited by: 8•References: 24

    There are a number of debates that are relevant to questions concerning objectivity in science. One of the eldest, and still one of the most intensely fought, is the debate over epistemic relativism. —All forms of epistemic relativism commit themselves to the view that it is impossible to show in a neutral, non-question-begging, way that one “epistemic system”, that is, one interconnected set of epistemic standards, is epistemically superior to (…

  • Summa Contra Scepticos

    Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2018•References: 2

    This critical notice concerns Duncan Pritchard's Epistemic Angst (2016). After a summary of the book, I offer some brief critical comments on five issues: the distinction between overriding and undercutting strategies against scepticism, epistemic relativism, foundationalist hinge epistemology, the relationship between hinge propositions and evidence, and the universality of rational evaluation. Epistemic Angst is Duncan Pritchard's to-date most …

  • Georg Simmel and Pragmatism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch•ARTICLE•European Journal of Pragmatism…•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 2

    This paper offers some brief reflections on pragmatist themes in Georg Simmel’s philosophy. §1 presents a number of assessments – by Simmel’s contemporaries, by later interpreters, and by Simmel himself – concerning his proximity to pragmatism. §2 offers a reconstruction of Simmel’s 1885-paper “The Relationship between the Theory of Selection and Epistemology,” focusing in particular on what the argument owed to von Helmholtz. It was this paper f…

  • The genealogical method in epistemology

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2020•Cited by: 3•References: 37

    in which he introduced and defended a genealogical approach to epistemology. In recent years Craig's book has attracted a lot of attention, and his distinctive approach has been put to a wide range of uses including anti-realist metaepistemology, contextualism, relativism, anti-luck virtue epistemology, epistemic injustice, value of knowledge, pragmatism and virtue epistemology. While the number of objections to Craig's approach has accumulated, …

  • An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

    Open Access•Lusine Vaganian, Sonja Bussmann et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2021

    Overall, the analysis results according to the Rasch model support the use of the WHODAS 2.0 12-item version as a measure of disability in cancer patients

  • Cologne questionnaire on speechlessness: Development and validation

    Open Access•Thilo Dietz, Sally Tavenrath et al.•ARTICLE•Current Psychology•2023

    Speechlessness forms a psychological concept that describes non-speaking or silence in different situations. Speechlessness occurs in particular during emotional stress. The Cologne Questionnaire on Speechlessness (ger.: Kölner Fragebogen zur Sprachlosigkeit ) is an instrument for measuring speechlessness as a function of emotional perception and processing in situations of emotional stress or existing emotional dysregulation. The questionnaire w…

  • Speechlessness: A Conceptual Framework

    Open Access•Thilo Dietz, Vera Schiewer et al.•ARTICLE•Integrative Psychological and…•2024•References: 106

    The phenomenon of speechlessness has hardly been considered in the literature from a psychological point of view. Previous research on speechlessness is limited to the fields of neurology, medicine or psychopathology. The present review aims to consider speechlessness from a psychological perspective distinct from pathology, and to highlight its observability and possible connections to existing research in the context of emotional cognition and …

  • Unity or disunity of the sciences? The German debate around 1900

    Open Access•Michael Kusch•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    This paper gives an overview of the intense and prolonged debates concerning the relationships between the natural, social and historical sciences in German-speaking academia in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In particular, the paper focuses on discussions over cultural history (Schäfer versus Gothein; Buckle and Du Bois-Raymond versus Droysen and Lorenz; von Below versus Lamprecht); the position of psychology (Steinthal, Laza…

Epistemology (18 works) · Philosophy (18 works) · Sociology (10 works) · Psychology (9 works) · Philosophy (8 works) · Computer Science (6 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 works) · Philosophy, Science, and History (5 works) · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (4 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae