Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Kathleen C Mcculloch

Biographic Data

ID2581376
NAMEKathleen C Mcculloch
GIVEN NAMESKathleen C
FAMILY NAMEMcculloch
SIGNATUREMCCULLOCH K C
AFFILIATIONSIdaho State University
ORCID0000-0002-0795-8065
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS10
TOTAL CITATIONS37
AUTHOR COUNT10
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2006
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX4
  • Mistaking an Intention for a Behavior: The Case of Enacting Behavioral Decisions Versus Simply Intending to Enact Them

    Open Access•Dolores Albarracin, Aashna Sunderrajan et al.•ARTICLE•Personality and Social Psychology…•2021

    Five experiments investigated a previously unrecognized phenomenon—remembering that one enacted a mundane behavioral decision when one only intended to do so—and its psychological mechanisms. The theoretical conceptualization advanced in this research proposes that this error stems from a misattribution when an intention and a behavior are similar. Intentions and behaviors are similar when the physical aspects of the behavior resemble the intenti…

  • Reaching resolution: The effect of prayer on psychological perspective and emotional acceptance

    Kathleen C Mcculloch, Elizabeth J Parks‐Stamm et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology of Religion and…•2020

  • The role of motivation for rewards in vicarious goal satiation

    Open Access•Stephanie J Tobin, Katharine H Greenaway et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2015•Cited by: 1•References: 13

  • Naïve definitions of action and inaction: The continuum, spread, and valence of behaviors

    Open Access•Kathleen C Mcculloch, Hong Li et al.•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2012•Cited by: 6•References: 33

    The cohesiveness of a society depends, in part, on how its individual members manage their daily activities with respect to the goals of that society. Hence, there should be a degree of social agreement on what constitutes action and what constitutes inaction. The present research investigated the structure of action and inaction definitions, the evaluation of action versus inaction, and individual differences in these evaluations. Action–inactio…

  • Learning from yesterday's mistakes to fix tomorrow's problems: When functional counterfactual thinking and psychological distance collide

    Open Access•Rachel Smallman, Kathleen C Mcculloch•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2012•Cited by: 2•References: 32

    Functional counterfactual thinking involves a unique set of circumstances where one can both reflect on past events and imagine future possibilities. A key aspect of a counterfactual's functionality is that insight about past mistakes is converted into plans for future action, thereby improving self‐regulatory success. If counterfactual thinking is a self‐regulatory tool, then it should be similarly impacted by psychological mechanisms that influ…

  • Vicarious goal satiation

    Open Access•Kathleen C Mcculloch, Gráinne M Fitzsimons et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2010•Cited by: 8•References: 15

  • Implicit working memory

    Open Access•Ran R Hassin, John A Bargh et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2009

  • Strategic automation of emotion regulation

    Inge Schweiger Gallo, Angeliki Keil et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2009•Cited by: 8

    As implementation intentions are a powerful self-regulation tool for thought and action (meta-analysis by P. M. Gollwitzer & P. Sheeran, 2006), the present studies were conducted to address their effectiveness in regulating emotional reactivity. Disgust- (Study 1) and fear- (Study 2) eliciting stimuli were viewed under 3 different self-regulation instructions: the goal intention to not get disgusted or frightened, respectively, this goal intentio…

  • Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals

    Dolores Albarracin, Ian M Handley et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008•Cited by: 10

    General action and inaction goals can influence the amount of motor or cognitive output irrespective of the type of behavior in question, with the same stimuli producing trivial and important motor and cognitive manifestations normally viewed as parts of different systems. A series of experiments examined the effects of instilling general action and inaction goals using word primes, such as "action" and "rest." The first 5 experiments showed that…

  • Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)

    Dolores Albarracin, William Hart et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•2006•Cited by: 2•References: 21

    This commentary highlights the strengths of the associative-propositional evaluation model. It then describes problems in proposing a qualitative separation between propositional and associative processes. Propositional processes are instead described as associative. Propositions are ordered associations, whereas many other associations do not depend on the order of the involved elements. Implications of this alternative definition for the phenom…

  • Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals

    Dolores Albarracin, Ian M Handley et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008•Cited by: 10

    General action and inaction goals can influence the amount of motor or cognitive output irrespective of the type of behavior in question, with the same stimuli producing trivial and important motor and cognitive manifestations normally viewed as parts of different systems. A series of experiments examined the effects of instilling general action and inaction goals using word primes, such as "action" and "rest." The first 5 experiments showed that…

  • Vicarious goal satiation

    Open Access•Kathleen C Mcculloch, Gráinne M Fitzsimons et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2010•Cited by: 8•References: 15

  • Strategic automation of emotion regulation

    Inge Schweiger Gallo, Angeliki Keil et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2009•Cited by: 8

    As implementation intentions are a powerful self-regulation tool for thought and action (meta-analysis by P. M. Gollwitzer & P. Sheeran, 2006), the present studies were conducted to address their effectiveness in regulating emotional reactivity. Disgust- (Study 1) and fear- (Study 2) eliciting stimuli were viewed under 3 different self-regulation instructions: the goal intention to not get disgusted or frightened, respectively, this goal intentio…

  • Naïve definitions of action and inaction: The continuum, spread, and valence of behaviors

    Open Access•Kathleen C Mcculloch, Hong Li et al.•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2012•Cited by: 6•References: 33

    The cohesiveness of a society depends, in part, on how its individual members manage their daily activities with respect to the goals of that society. Hence, there should be a degree of social agreement on what constitutes action and what constitutes inaction. The present research investigated the structure of action and inaction definitions, the evaluation of action versus inaction, and individual differences in these evaluations. Action–inactio…

  • Learning from yesterday's mistakes to fix tomorrow's problems: When functional counterfactual thinking and psychological distance collide

    Open Access•Rachel Smallman, Kathleen C Mcculloch•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2012•Cited by: 2•References: 32

    Functional counterfactual thinking involves a unique set of circumstances where one can both reflect on past events and imagine future possibilities. A key aspect of a counterfactual's functionality is that insight about past mistakes is converted into plans for future action, thereby improving self‐regulatory success. If counterfactual thinking is a self‐regulatory tool, then it should be similarly impacted by psychological mechanisms that influ…

  • Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)

    Dolores Albarracin, William Hart et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•2006•Cited by: 2•References: 21

    This commentary highlights the strengths of the associative-propositional evaluation model. It then describes problems in proposing a qualitative separation between propositional and associative processes. Propositional processes are instead described as associative. Propositions are ordered associations, whereas many other associations do not depend on the order of the involved elements. Implications of this alternative definition for the phenom…

  • The role of motivation for rewards in vicarious goal satiation

    Open Access•Stephanie J Tobin, Katharine H Greenaway et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2015•Cited by: 1•References: 13

  • Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)

    Dolores Albarracin, William Hart et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•2006•Cited by: 2•References: 21

    This commentary highlights the strengths of the associative-propositional evaluation model. It then describes problems in proposing a qualitative separation between propositional and associative processes. Propositional processes are instead described as associative. Propositions are ordered associations, whereas many other associations do not depend on the order of the involved elements. Implications of this alternative definition for the phenom…

  • Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals

    Dolores Albarracin, Ian M Handley et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008•Cited by: 10

    General action and inaction goals can influence the amount of motor or cognitive output irrespective of the type of behavior in question, with the same stimuli producing trivial and important motor and cognitive manifestations normally viewed as parts of different systems. A series of experiments examined the effects of instilling general action and inaction goals using word primes, such as "action" and "rest." The first 5 experiments showed that…

  • Implicit working memory

    Open Access•Ran R Hassin, John A Bargh et al.•ARTICLE•Consciousness and Cognition•2009

  • Strategic automation of emotion regulation

    Inge Schweiger Gallo, Angeliki Keil et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2009•Cited by: 8

    As implementation intentions are a powerful self-regulation tool for thought and action (meta-analysis by P. M. Gollwitzer & P. Sheeran, 2006), the present studies were conducted to address their effectiveness in regulating emotional reactivity. Disgust- (Study 1) and fear- (Study 2) eliciting stimuli were viewed under 3 different self-regulation instructions: the goal intention to not get disgusted or frightened, respectively, this goal intentio…

  • Vicarious goal satiation

    Open Access•Kathleen C Mcculloch, Gráinne M Fitzsimons et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2010•Cited by: 8•References: 15

  • Naïve definitions of action and inaction: The continuum, spread, and valence of behaviors

    Open Access•Kathleen C Mcculloch, Hong Li et al.•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2012•Cited by: 6•References: 33

    The cohesiveness of a society depends, in part, on how its individual members manage their daily activities with respect to the goals of that society. Hence, there should be a degree of social agreement on what constitutes action and what constitutes inaction. The present research investigated the structure of action and inaction definitions, the evaluation of action versus inaction, and individual differences in these evaluations. Action–inactio…

  • Learning from yesterday's mistakes to fix tomorrow's problems: When functional counterfactual thinking and psychological distance collide

    Open Access•Rachel Smallman, Kathleen C Mcculloch•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2012•Cited by: 2•References: 32

    Functional counterfactual thinking involves a unique set of circumstances where one can both reflect on past events and imagine future possibilities. A key aspect of a counterfactual's functionality is that insight about past mistakes is converted into plans for future action, thereby improving self‐regulatory success. If counterfactual thinking is a self‐regulatory tool, then it should be similarly impacted by psychological mechanisms that influ…

  • The role of motivation for rewards in vicarious goal satiation

    Open Access•Stephanie J Tobin, Katharine H Greenaway et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2015•Cited by: 1•References: 13

  • Reaching resolution: The effect of prayer on psychological perspective and emotional acceptance

    Kathleen C Mcculloch, Elizabeth J Parks‐Stamm et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology of Religion and…•2020

  • Mistaking an Intention for a Behavior: The Case of Enacting Behavioral Decisions Versus Simply Intending to Enact Them

    Open Access•Dolores Albarracin, Aashna Sunderrajan et al.•ARTICLE•Personality and Social Psychology…•2021

    Five experiments investigated a previously unrecognized phenomenon—remembering that one enacted a mundane behavioral decision when one only intended to do so—and its psychological mechanisms. The theoretical conceptualization advanced in this research proposes that this error stems from a misattribution when an intention and a behavior are similar. Intentions and behaviors are similar when the physical aspects of the behavior resemble the intenti…

Psychology (10 works) · Social Psychology (9 works) · Cognitive psychology (8 works) · Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 works) · Action (physics) (4 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Cultural Differences and Values (4 works) · Cognition (3 works) · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae