Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Timothy M Errington

Biographic Data

ID291771
NAMETimothy M Errington
GIVEN NAMESTimothy M
FAMILY NAMEErrington
SIGNATUREERRINGTON T M
AFFILIATIONSCenter for Open Science
ORCID0000-0002-4959-5143
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS37
AUTHOR COUNT5
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2016
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX2
  • Predicting the replicability of social and behavioural science claims in Covid-19 preprints

    Open Access•Alexandru Marcoci, David P Wilkinson et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2024•References: 48

    Replications are important for assessing the reliability of published findings. However, they are costly, and it is infeasible to replicate everything. Accurate, fast, lower-cost alternatives such as eliciting predictions could accelerate assessment for rapid policy implementation in a crisis and help guide a more efficient allocation of scarce replication resources. We elicited judgements from participants on 100 claims from preprints about an e…

  • Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model

    Open Access•Courtney K Soderberg, Timothy M Errington et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2021•Cited by: 9•References: 34

  • What is replication?

    Open Access•Brian A Nosek, Timothy M Errington•ARTICLE•PLOS Biology•2020

    Credibility of scientific claims is established with evidence for their replicability using new data. According to common understanding, replication is repeating a study's procedure and observing whether the prior finding recurs. This definition is intuitive, easy to apply, and incorrect. We propose that replication is a study for which any outcome would be considered diagnostic evidence about a claim from prior research. This definition reduces …

  • Preregistering Qualitative Research: A Delphi Study

    Open Access•Tamarinde L Haven, Timothy M Errington et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2020•Cited by: 28•References: 38

    Preregistrations-records made a priori about study designs and analysis plans and placed in open repositories-are thought to strengthen the credibility and transparency of research. Different authors have put forth arguments in favor of introducing this practice in qualitative research and made suggestions for what to include in a qualitative preregistration form. The goal of this study was to gauge and understand what parts of preregistration te…

  • Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency

    Open Access•Mallory C Kidwell, Ljiljana B Lazarevic et al.•ARTICLE•PLOS Biology•2016

    Beginning January 2014, Psychological Science gave authors the opportunity to signal open data and materials if they qualified for badges that accompanied published articles. Before badges, less than 3% of Psychological Science articles reported open data. After badges, 23% reported open data, with an accelerating trend; 39% reported open data in the first half of 2015, an increase of more than an order of magnitude from baseline. There was no ch…

  • Preregistering Qualitative Research: A Delphi Study

    Open Access•Tamarinde L Haven, Timothy M Errington et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2020•Cited by: 28•References: 38

    Preregistrations-records made a priori about study designs and analysis plans and placed in open repositories-are thought to strengthen the credibility and transparency of research. Different authors have put forth arguments in favor of introducing this practice in qualitative research and made suggestions for what to include in a qualitative preregistration form. The goal of this study was to gauge and understand what parts of preregistration te…

  • Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model

    Open Access•Courtney K Soderberg, Timothy M Errington et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2021•Cited by: 9•References: 34

  • Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency

    Open Access•Mallory C Kidwell, Ljiljana B Lazarevic et al.•ARTICLE•PLOS Biology•2016

    Beginning January 2014, Psychological Science gave authors the opportunity to signal open data and materials if they qualified for badges that accompanied published articles. Before badges, less than 3% of Psychological Science articles reported open data. After badges, 23% reported open data, with an accelerating trend; 39% reported open data in the first half of 2015, an increase of more than an order of magnitude from baseline. There was no ch…

  • What is replication?

    Open Access•Brian A Nosek, Timothy M Errington•ARTICLE•PLOS Biology•2020

    Credibility of scientific claims is established with evidence for their replicability using new data. According to common understanding, replication is repeating a study's procedure and observing whether the prior finding recurs. This definition is intuitive, easy to apply, and incorrect. We propose that replication is a study for which any outcome would be considered diagnostic evidence about a claim from prior research. This definition reduces …

  • Preregistering Qualitative Research: A Delphi Study

    Open Access•Tamarinde L Haven, Timothy M Errington et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2020•Cited by: 28•References: 38

    Preregistrations-records made a priori about study designs and analysis plans and placed in open repositories-are thought to strengthen the credibility and transparency of research. Different authors have put forth arguments in favor of introducing this practice in qualitative research and made suggestions for what to include in a qualitative preregistration form. The goal of this study was to gauge and understand what parts of preregistration te…

  • Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model

    Open Access•Courtney K Soderberg, Timothy M Errington et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2021•Cited by: 9•References: 34

  • Predicting the replicability of social and behavioural science claims in Covid-19 preprints

    Open Access•Alexandru Marcoci, David P Wilkinson et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2024•References: 48

    Replications are important for assessing the reliability of published findings. However, they are costly, and it is infeasible to replicate everything. Accurate, fast, lower-cost alternatives such as eliciting predictions could accelerate assessment for rapid policy implementation in a crisis and help guide a more efficient allocation of scarce replication resources. We elicited judgements from participants on 100 claims from preprints about an e…

Computer Science (5 works) · Psychology (5 works) · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 works) · Data science (3 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 works) · Academic Publishing and Open Access (2 works) · Alternative medicine (2 works) · Biology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae