Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4615535 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Courtney K Soderberg (0000-0003-1227-7042, Center for Open Science), Timothy M Errington (0000-0002-4959-5143, Center for Open Science), Sarah R Schiavone (0000-0002-8829-137X, University of California, Davis), Julia Bottesini, Julia G Bottesini (0000-0002-5340-993X, University of California, Davis), Felix Singleton Thorn (0000-0002-0237-6146, The University of Melbourne), Simine Vazire (0000-0002-3933-9752, The University of Melbourne), Kevin M Esterling (0000-0002-5529-6422, University of California, Riverside), Brian A Nosek (0000-0001-6797-5476, Center for Open Science, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 990-997 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Nature Human Behaviour (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2397-3374 • E-ISSN: 2397-3374 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1038/s41562-021-01142-4 |
| PMID | 34168323 |
| OpenAlex | W3174993952 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 32 |
| References cited | 35 |
Data science · Epistemology · Information retrieval · Political science · Publishing · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Computer Science · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Philosophy · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
How open science can benefit bilingualism research
Conceptual replication study of fifteen JDM effects
A registered report survey of open research practices in psychology departments in the UK and Ireland
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
Trusting on the shoulders of open giants? Open science increases trust in science for the public and academics
The Science of Open (Communication) Science
Can Results-Blind Selection Improve Science Communication?
Registered Report - Stage II
Positionality and Its Problems
Reckoning With Our Crisis
Retractions and Rewards in Science
Unequal treatment under the flaw
Beware influential findings that have not been replicated
Perceptions of Single-Case Experimental Design Researchers About Questionable and Improved Research Practices
Expert opinions on threats and impacts in the marine environment
Registered report adoption in academic journals
Toward a Coherent and Comprehensive Approach to Teacher Well-Being
No Peeking
The trustworthiness of the cumulative knowledge in industrial/organizational psychology
Public Administration Beyond Public Administration Journals
No panacea, but a pivotal progress – A response to Souza-Neto and Moyle
Process and Bureaucracy
Five barriers to defining responsible drinking
Open Science in Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
A Systematic Review on the Evolution of Power Analysis Practices in Psychological Research
Elite Partisan Disagreement and Military Victory
Preregistration and Registered Reports in Sociology
Political ideology and trust in scientists in the USA
The past, present and future of Registered Reports
Examining the replicability of online experiments selected by a decision market
Research on registered report research
Scientists should get credit for correcting the literature
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
Publication prejudices
“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.
Publication bias in the social sciences
Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond
Why We (Usually) Don't Have to Worry About Multiple Comparisons
Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
Replications in Psychology Research
Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
Scientific Utopia
Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences
Peer Review
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
False-Positive Psychology
Many Labs 2
Facts Are More Important Than Novelty
Charting the future of social psychology on stormy seas
Many Labs 3
Investigating Variation in Replicability
Registered Reports
Mapping the universe of registered reports
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015
Protocol transparency is vital for registered reports
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis
| Unique citing works | 32 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,68 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2026 (20) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 29 |