The past, present and future of Registered Reports
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4656336 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Christopher D Chambers (0000-0001-6058-4114, Cardiff University), Loukia Tzavella (0000-0002-1463-9396, Cardiff University) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 29-42 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-11-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Nature Human Behaviour (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2397-3374 • E-ISSN: 2397-3374 |
| Editora | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1038/s41562-021-01193-7 |
| PMID | 34782730 |
| OpenAlex | W3211435516 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 55 |
| Referências citadas | 91 |
Registered Reports are a form of empirical publication in which study proposals are peer reviewed and pre-accepted before research is undertaken. By deciding which articles are published based on the question, theory and methods, Registered Reports offer a remedy for a range of reporting and publication biases. Here, we reflect on the history, progress and future prospects of the Registered Reports initiative and offer practical guidance for authors, reviewers and editors. We review early evidence that Registered Reports are working as intended, while at the same time acknowledging that they are not a universal solution for irreproducibility. We also consider how the policies and practices surrounding Registered Reports are changing, or must change in the future, to address limitations and adapt to new challenges. We conclude that Registered Reports are promoting reproducibility, transparency and self-correction across disciplines and may help reshape how society evaluates research and researchers. Registered Reports were introduced a decade ago as a means for improving the rigour and credibility of confirmatory research. Chambers and Tzavella overview the format’s past, its current status and future developments
Data science · MEDLINE · Political science · Clinical practice guidelines implementation · Computer Science · Law · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
The Iuenna project
The landscape of open science in behavioral addiction research
Linguistic prosody in autism spectrum disorder-An overview
Why Hypothesis Testers Should Spend Less Time Testing Hypotheses
How open science can benefit bilingualism research
Does Body‐Specificity Stand on Solid Ground? Z ‐Curving the Association Between Emotional Valence and Lateral Space
Estimating the replicability of statistically significant moderation effects in personality research using z-curve analysis
Open Science in Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
Overcoming Challenges to Open Research Practices – A Perspective From the Global South
(Why) Are Open Research Practices the Future for the Study of Language Learning
Ordinal regression models made easy
A registered report survey of open research practices in psychology departments in the UK and Ireland
A Practical Guide to Registered Reports for Economists
Assessing TDApp
Registered Report - Stage II
Your Time, Whose Science? On Tempo Reviewability in Human Movement Research
Modeling the path to digital health intention
Neglect of the individual as a neglected problem
Integrating the Philosophy and Psychology of Well-Being
Eight puzzles of leadership science
The crisis of peer review
Exploratory hypothesis tests can be more compelling than confirmatory hypothesis tests
Establishing open science research priorities in health psychology
Beware influential findings that have not been replicated
Registered Reports in Journal of Memory and Language
Introduction to the Special Series
Does Conceptual Abstraction Moderate Whether Past Moral Deeds Motivate Consistency or Compensatory Behavior? A Registered Replication and Extension of Conway and Peetz (2012)
No Peeking
Commentary
Registered Reports in Child Development
The trustworthiness of the cumulative knowledge in industrial/organizational psychology
Prevalence of Registered Reports in experimental psychology journals
Process and Bureaucracy
More than meets the ITT
Open data through Registered Reports can accelerate cumulative knowledge
Lower caution, not inhibitory control, predicts gambling severity – a Registered Report
Is Social Work Research in Crisis
Why I declare a conflict of interest and you should not
The Open Science of Religion Project @ the IJPR
Between Gift-Giving and Accumulation
AI, trust, and the market for lemons
Infusing pre-registration into tourism research
Open scholarship in applied linguistics
Whose open science are we talking about? From open science in psychology to open science in applied linguistics
Preregistration and predictivism
Elite Partisan Disagreement and Military Victory
Preregistration and Registered Reports in Sociology
Elegant theories and the problems of social psychology
Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration
The future of academic publishing
An Exploration of the Presence of Positive-Results Bias in Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Studying Identity and Migration in the Open Science Era
The past, present, and future of experimental methods in the social sciences
Advances in transparency and reproducibility in the social sciences
Smell throughout the life course
The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
Publication prejudices
“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
Publication bias in the social sciences
Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress
Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond
Bayes factor design analysis
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Replications in Psychology Research
Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
Power failure
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies
Preregistering qualitative research
Registered Reports
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
Scientific Utopia
Promoting an open research culture
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
How Computational Modeling Can Force Theory Building in Psychological Science
Equivalence Tests
Questionable Research Practices Revisited
Harking
Publication bias in qualitative research
Enhancing transparency and openness at the Journal of Research in Personality
The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis
Improving what is published
Pre-Analysis Plans for Qualitative Research
Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results
Mapping the universe of registered reports
Protocol transparency is vital for registered reports
A manifesto for reproducible science
Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model
| Obras citantes distintas | 55 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,89 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2007 - 2026 (20) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 43 |