Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Michelle R Worosz

Biographic Data

ID339116
NAMEMichelle R Worosz
GIVEN NAMESMichelle R
FAMILY NAMEWorosz
SIGNATUREWOROSZ M R
AFFILIATIONSAuburn University
ORCID0000-0003-4919-0477
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS9
TOTAL CITATIONS25
AUTHOR COUNT9
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2008
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX3
  • Farming with a mission

    Open Access•Michelle R Worosz, E Melanie Dupuis•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2024•References: 20

    Organizations interested in food alterity, security, and justice are often governed as 501(c)(3) nonprofits. As such, they are required to fulfill missions beyond profit maximization. This study focuses on the role of nonprofits in the agrifood system. Looking at nonprofit farms as both farms and as nonprofits, we seek to understand whether nonprofit organizations, as an alternative mode of governance, creates the possibility of an alternative ec…

  • Covid research across the social sciences in 2020

    Open Access•Ryan W Thomson, Rebecca Mosier et al.•ARTICLE•Scientometrics•2023

  • Advancing the scholarship and practice of stakeholder engagement in working landscapes

    Open Access•Weston M Eaton, Morey Burnham et al.•ARTICLE•Socio-Ecological Practice Research•2022

    Participatory approaches to science and decision making, including stakeholder engagement, are increasingly common for managing complex socio-ecological challenges in working landscapes. However, critical questions about stakeholder engagement in this space remain. These include normative, political, and ethical questions concerning who participates, who benefits and loses, what good can be accomplished, and for what, whom, and by who. First, opp…

  • Transdisciplinary research for wicked problems

    Open Access•Michelle R Worosz•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2022•Cited by: 2•References: 4

  • A qualitative study of Southern U.S. consumers' top of the mind beliefs about the safety of local beef

    Open Access•Amy L Telligman, Miguel Cardenal Carro et al.•ARTICLE•Appetite•2017•Cited by: 2•References: 36

    Following the Reasoned Action Approach, the aim of this study was to explore consumers' top-of-mind food safety beliefs about local beef. Beef consumers recruited from farmers' markets (N = 101) and grocery stores (N = 174) across the state of Alabama participated in face-to-face intercept surveys. The survey included closed- and open-ended questions designed to elicit consumers' food safety beliefs about local beef. Results indicate that beef sa…

  • The Importance of Governance Levels in Alternative Food Networks

    Open Access•Riva C H Denny, Michelle R Worosz et al.•ARTICLE•Rural Sociology•2016•Cited by: 5•References: 56

    Focusing on U.S. red meat inspection regulations, in the context of alternative food networks (AFNs), we explore the implications of different levels of governmental governance for the number of red meat slaughter establishments in the United States. We argue that disaggregating 'the state' makes possible a more nuanced consideration of the effects of different tiers of governance. We use regression analysis with data for 40 U.S. states over 40 y…

  • Zero tolerance rules in food safety and quality

    Open Access•Norbert Wilson, Michelle R Worosz•ARTICLE•Food Policy•2013•Cited by: 2•References: 9

  • Risk, anti-reflexivity, and ethical neutralization in industrial food processing

    Open Access•Diana Stuart, Michelle R Worosz•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2011•Cited by: 9•References: 12

  • Resilience in the US red meat industry

    Open Access•Michelle R Worosz, Andrew Knight et al.•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2008•Cited by: 5•References: 9

  • Risk, anti-reflexivity, and ethical neutralization in industrial food processing

    Open Access•Diana Stuart, Michelle R Worosz•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2011•Cited by: 9•References: 12

  • The Importance of Governance Levels in Alternative Food Networks

    Open Access•Riva C H Denny, Michelle R Worosz et al.•ARTICLE•Rural Sociology•2016•Cited by: 5•References: 56

    Focusing on U.S. red meat inspection regulations, in the context of alternative food networks (AFNs), we explore the implications of different levels of governmental governance for the number of red meat slaughter establishments in the United States. We argue that disaggregating 'the state' makes possible a more nuanced consideration of the effects of different tiers of governance. We use regression analysis with data for 40 U.S. states over 40 y…

  • Resilience in the US red meat industry

    Open Access•Michelle R Worosz, Andrew Knight et al.•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2008•Cited by: 5•References: 9

  • Transdisciplinary research for wicked problems

    Open Access•Michelle R Worosz•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2022•Cited by: 2•References: 4

  • A qualitative study of Southern U.S. consumers' top of the mind beliefs about the safety of local beef

    Open Access•Amy L Telligman, Miguel Cardenal Carro et al.•ARTICLE•Appetite•2017•Cited by: 2•References: 36

    Following the Reasoned Action Approach, the aim of this study was to explore consumers' top-of-mind food safety beliefs about local beef. Beef consumers recruited from farmers' markets (N = 101) and grocery stores (N = 174) across the state of Alabama participated in face-to-face intercept surveys. The survey included closed- and open-ended questions designed to elicit consumers' food safety beliefs about local beef. Results indicate that beef sa…

  • Zero tolerance rules in food safety and quality

    Open Access•Norbert Wilson, Michelle R Worosz•ARTICLE•Food Policy•2013•Cited by: 2•References: 9

  • Resilience in the US red meat industry

    Open Access•Michelle R Worosz, Andrew Knight et al.•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2008•Cited by: 5•References: 9

  • Risk, anti-reflexivity, and ethical neutralization in industrial food processing

    Open Access•Diana Stuart, Michelle R Worosz•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2011•Cited by: 9•References: 12

  • Zero tolerance rules in food safety and quality

    Open Access•Norbert Wilson, Michelle R Worosz•ARTICLE•Food Policy•2013•Cited by: 2•References: 9

  • The Importance of Governance Levels in Alternative Food Networks

    Open Access•Riva C H Denny, Michelle R Worosz et al.•ARTICLE•Rural Sociology•2016•Cited by: 5•References: 56

    Focusing on U.S. red meat inspection regulations, in the context of alternative food networks (AFNs), we explore the implications of different levels of governmental governance for the number of red meat slaughter establishments in the United States. We argue that disaggregating 'the state' makes possible a more nuanced consideration of the effects of different tiers of governance. We use regression analysis with data for 40 U.S. states over 40 y…

  • A qualitative study of Southern U.S. consumers' top of the mind beliefs about the safety of local beef

    Open Access•Amy L Telligman, Miguel Cardenal Carro et al.•ARTICLE•Appetite•2017•Cited by: 2•References: 36

    Following the Reasoned Action Approach, the aim of this study was to explore consumers' top-of-mind food safety beliefs about local beef. Beef consumers recruited from farmers' markets (N = 101) and grocery stores (N = 174) across the state of Alabama participated in face-to-face intercept surveys. The survey included closed- and open-ended questions designed to elicit consumers' food safety beliefs about local beef. Results indicate that beef sa…

  • Advancing the scholarship and practice of stakeholder engagement in working landscapes

    Open Access•Weston M Eaton, Morey Burnham et al.•ARTICLE•Socio-Ecological Practice Research•2022

    Participatory approaches to science and decision making, including stakeholder engagement, are increasingly common for managing complex socio-ecological challenges in working landscapes. However, critical questions about stakeholder engagement in this space remain. These include normative, political, and ethical questions concerning who participates, who benefits and loses, what good can be accomplished, and for what, whom, and by who. First, opp…

  • Transdisciplinary research for wicked problems

    Open Access•Michelle R Worosz•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2022•Cited by: 2•References: 4

  • Covid research across the social sciences in 2020

    Open Access•Ryan W Thomson, Rebecca Mosier et al.•ARTICLE•Scientometrics•2023

  • Farming with a mission

    Open Access•Michelle R Worosz, E Melanie Dupuis•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2024•References: 20

    Organizations interested in food alterity, security, and justice are often governed as 501(c)(3) nonprofits. As such, they are required to fulfill missions beyond profit maximization. This study focuses on the role of nonprofits in the agrifood system. Looking at nonprofit farms as both farms and as nonprofits, we seek to understand whether nonprofit organizations, as an alternative mode of governance, creates the possibility of an alternative ec…

Political science (8 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Business (5 works) · Economics (5 works) · Social science (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Organic Food and Agriculture (3 works) · Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae