Alfonso García Figueroa
Biographic Data
| ID | 3500076 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Alfonso García Figueroa |
| GIVEN NAMES | Alfonso García |
| FAMILY NAME | Figueroa |
| SIGNATURE | FIGUEROA A G |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Castilla-La Mancha |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2006 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
José Antonio Sendín Mateos (2017), La filosofía moral de Hans Kelsen
Este artículo reseña: José Antonio Sendín Mateos, La filosofía moral de Hans Kelsen. Madrid, Marcial Pons, 2017, 332 pp
Lorenzo Peña y Gonzalo (2017), Visión lógica del derecho. Una defensa del racionalismo jurídico
.-
La disputada gloria de Ronald Dworkin. Reflexiones a propósito de un homenaje póstumo = Ronald Dworkin’s Glory at Stake. Reflections on a Posthumous Tribute
This paper explores the causes and reasons of the success and preeminence of Ronald Dworkin’s theory in the Spanish speaking legal culture by examining the set of works which have been edited by the Centro de Estudios Constitucionales after the title El legado de Dworkin a la filosofía del Derecho on the occasion of the recent Dworkin’s death. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2016.3283
Bemerkungen zu einer dispositionellen Erklärung des Rechts anhand der Diskussion der Verbindungs- und Trennungsthese
This article shows how Positivism and Jusnaturalism are answers to one wrong question (a pseudoproblem). They may be considered as parts of one and the same paradigm based on two presuppositions, namely dualism and objectualism. This paradigm gives no suitable understanding of two main transformations of practical discourse: (legal) Constitutionalism and (ethical) Constructivism. A new paradigm, i.e. neoconstitutionalism, based on the idea of uni…
No prominent works on this page.
Bemerkungen zu einer dispositionellen Erklärung des Rechts anhand der Diskussion der Verbindungs- und Trennungsthese
This article shows how Positivism and Jusnaturalism are answers to one wrong question (a pseudoproblem). They may be considered as parts of one and the same paradigm based on two presuppositions, namely dualism and objectualism. This paradigm gives no suitable understanding of two main transformations of practical discourse: (legal) Constitutionalism and (ethical) Constructivism. A new paradigm, i.e. neoconstitutionalism, based on the idea of uni…
La disputada gloria de Ronald Dworkin. Reflexiones a propósito de un homenaje póstumo = Ronald Dworkin’s Glory at Stake. Reflections on a Posthumous Tribute
This paper explores the causes and reasons of the success and preeminence of Ronald Dworkin’s theory in the Spanish speaking legal culture by examining the set of works which have been edited by the Centro de Estudios Constitucionales after the title El legado de Dworkin a la filosofía del Derecho on the occasion of the recent Dworkin’s death. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2016.3283
Lorenzo Peña y Gonzalo (2017), Visión lógica del derecho. Una defensa del racionalismo jurídico
.-
José Antonio Sendín Mateos (2017), La filosofía moral de Hans Kelsen
Este artículo reseña: José Antonio Sendín Mateos, La filosofía moral de Hans Kelsen. Madrid, Marcial Pons, 2017, 332 pp
Humanities (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (2 works) · Comparative International Legal Studies (2 works) · Legal processes and jurisprudence (2 works) · Critical Theory and Philosophy (1 work) · Dualism (1 work) · Empiricism (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work) · Glory (1 work)