Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bemerkungen zu einer dispositionellen Erklärung des Rechts anhand der Diskussion der Verbindungs- und Trennungsthese

Bibliographic Data

ID22286388
AuthorsAlfonso García Figueroa (University of Castilla-La Mancha)
Year2006
Volume92
Issue3
Pages363-381
Publication date2006-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchiv für Rechts- und Wirtschaftsphilosophie (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0177-1108 • E-ISSN: 2363-5606
PublisherWissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.25162/arsp-2006-0026
OpenAlexW124809093
LanguageDE

This article shows how Positivism and Jusnaturalism are answers to one wrong question (a pseudoproblem). They may be considered as parts of one and the same paradigm based on two presuppositions, namely dualism and objectualism. This paradigm gives no suitable understanding of two main transformations of practical discourse: (legal) Constitutionalism and (ethical) Constructivism. A new paradigm, i.e. neoconstitutionalism, based on the idea of unity of practical reason and a dispositional conception of correction provides a better framework to study these changes. Within this framework, the article examines the discussion between Robert Alexy and Eugenio Bulygin concerning the relationship between Law and morality

Dualism · Empiricism · Epistemology · Humanities · Legal positivism · Morality · Philosophy of law · Political science · Positivism · Presupposition · Sociology · Law · Law and Political Science · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae