Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mavis Jones

Biographic Data

ID3596751
NAMEMavis Jones
GIVEN NAMESMavis
FAMILY NAMEJones
SIGNATUREJONES M
AFFILIATIONSDalhousie University
ORCID0000-0002-6701-3186
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS12
TOTAL CITATIONS94
WORKS AS AUTHOR12
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2002
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2016
H-INDEX5
  • Exploring the post-genomic world

    Open Access•Christina Holmes, Siobhan M Carlson et al.•ARTICLE•New Genetics and Society•2016

    Richard Lewontin proposed that the ability of a scientific field to create a narrative for public understanding garners it social relevance. This article applies Lewontin's conceptual framework of the functions of science (manipulatory and explanatory) to compare and explain the current differences in perceived societal relevance of genetics/genomics and proteomics. We provide three examples to illustrate the social relevance and strong cultural …

  • Where Now for Post-Normal Science

    Open Access•John Turnpenny, Mavis Jones et al.•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•2011

    ‘‘Post-normal science’’ (PNS) has received much attention in recent years, but like many iconic concepts, it has attracted differing conceptualizations, applications, and implications, ranging from being a ‘‘cure-all’’ for democratic deficit to the key to achieving more sustainable futures. This editorial article introduces a Special Issue that takes stock of research on PNS and critically explores how such research may develop. Through reviewing…

  • Institutional policy learning and public consultation

    Open Access•Mavis Jones, Edna Einsiedel•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2011•Cited by: 5•References: 18

  • Rendre évident

    Janice Graham, Mavis Jones•ARTICLE•Sociologie et sociétés•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 50

    Dans le champ des études sociales de la science, les régimes de régulation du risque appréhendés selon une approche technocratique sont critiqués pour leur attention insuffisante au « public », point de vue épistémologique socialement situé qui pourtant est davantage en mesure d'articuler les préoccupations du monde réel aux implications (collectives) du risque. Il semble qu'on ait répondu à cette critique dans plusieurs pays en modernisant les r…

  • Proceeding carefully

    Open Access•Mavis Jones, B Salter•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2010

    The Canadian Act Respecting Assisted Human Reproduction and Related Research (AHR Act), which came into effect in 2004, was the culmination of fifteen years of policy development in this often controversial field. Drawing from a series of semi-structured elite interviews and extensive documentary research, we examine the path to policy for the AHR Act. We identified several influences on the Act’s development, including: 1) feminist-informed acti…

  • Locating Scientific Citizenship

    Open Access•Karen Bickerstaff, Irene Lorenzoni et al.•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•2010•Cited by: 10•References: 33

    In this article, we explore the institutional negotiation of public engagement in matters of science and technology. We take the example of the Science in Society dialogue program initiated by the UK's Royal Society, but set this case within the wider experience of the public engagement activities of a range of charities, corporations, governmental departments, and scientific institutions. The novelty of the analysis lies in the linking of an acc…

  • Noisy and definitely not normal

    Open Access•John Turnpenny, Irene Lorenzoni et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2009•Cited by: 16•References: 23

  • Climate change, human genetics, and post-normality in the UK

    Open Access•Irene Lorenzoni, Mavis Jones et al.•ARTICLE•Futures•2007•Cited by: 29•References: 28

  • Change in the policy community of human genetics

    B Salter, Mavis Jones•ARTICLE•Policy & Politics•2006•Cited by: 7•References: 3

    English The 1999 Review of biotechnology regulation required the policy community of human genetics to introduce a new and open approach to governance. In implementing this policy of self-reform, the policy community is obliged to reconcile conflicting political demands from the policy networks of civil society, science and industry as it seeks to establish and maintain the legitimacy of the new regulatory apparatus. Drawing on documentary and in…

  • Biobanks and bioethics

    B Salter, Mavis Jones•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2005•Cited by: 26•References: 30

    Taking Biobank UK as its centrepiece, this paper analyses the politics of legitimation accompanying the emergence of population-based genetic databases and the contribution of bioethics to the power play therein. First, it explores the nature of the legitimation problem experienced by biotechnology and considers the extent to which bioethics can be regarded as an epistemic community capable of responding to that problem through a regulatory contr…

  • The governance of human genetics

    Open Access•Mavis Jones, B Salter•ARTICLE•New Genetics and Society•2003

    The collection of practices now commonly understood as 'biotechnology' poses a challenge to traditional mechanisms of regulating science and technology, just as it challenges traditional practices of science. The task of regulation is to reconcile the often conflicting political demands of protecting science, economy and the public interest. Public trust is the key measure of political success or failure. The purpose of this paper is to use polic…

  • Regulating human genetics

    B Salter, Mavis Jones•ARTICLE•Health Risk & Society•2002

    Human genetics poses new political issues for the governance systems of the EU and, in so doing, graphically illustrates the regulatory problematic of innovative health technologies (IHTs). Civil society, industry and the scientific community are registering new, and conflicting, political demands on the governance policy community of the EU. At the same time, the traditional reliance of that community on technocratic networks as the mainstay of …

  • Climate change, human genetics, and post-normality in the UK

    Open Access•Irene Lorenzoni, Mavis Jones et al.•ARTICLE•Futures•2007•Cited by: 29•References: 28

  • Biobanks and bioethics

    B Salter, Mavis Jones•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2005•Cited by: 26•References: 30

    Taking Biobank UK as its centrepiece, this paper analyses the politics of legitimation accompanying the emergence of population-based genetic databases and the contribution of bioethics to the power play therein. First, it explores the nature of the legitimation problem experienced by biotechnology and considers the extent to which bioethics can be regarded as an epistemic community capable of responding to that problem through a regulatory contr…

  • Noisy and definitely not normal

    Open Access•John Turnpenny, Irene Lorenzoni et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2009•Cited by: 16•References: 23

  • Locating Scientific Citizenship

    Open Access•Karen Bickerstaff, Irene Lorenzoni et al.•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•2010•Cited by: 10•References: 33

    In this article, we explore the institutional negotiation of public engagement in matters of science and technology. We take the example of the Science in Society dialogue program initiated by the UK's Royal Society, but set this case within the wider experience of the public engagement activities of a range of charities, corporations, governmental departments, and scientific institutions. The novelty of the analysis lies in the linking of an acc…

  • Change in the policy community of human genetics

    B Salter, Mavis Jones•ARTICLE•Policy & Politics•2006•Cited by: 7•References: 3

    English The 1999 Review of biotechnology regulation required the policy community of human genetics to introduce a new and open approach to governance. In implementing this policy of self-reform, the policy community is obliged to reconcile conflicting political demands from the policy networks of civil society, science and industry as it seeks to establish and maintain the legitimacy of the new regulatory apparatus. Drawing on documentary and in…

  • Institutional policy learning and public consultation

    Open Access•Mavis Jones, Edna Einsiedel•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2011•Cited by: 5•References: 18

  • Rendre évident

    Janice Graham, Mavis Jones•ARTICLE•Sociologie et sociétés•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 50

    Dans le champ des études sociales de la science, les régimes de régulation du risque appréhendés selon une approche technocratique sont critiqués pour leur attention insuffisante au « public », point de vue épistémologique socialement situé qui pourtant est davantage en mesure d'articuler les préoccupations du monde réel aux implications (collectives) du risque. Il semble qu'on ait répondu à cette critique dans plusieurs pays en modernisant les r…

  • Regulating human genetics

    B Salter, Mavis Jones•ARTICLE•Health Risk & Society•2002

    Human genetics poses new political issues for the governance systems of the EU and, in so doing, graphically illustrates the regulatory problematic of innovative health technologies (IHTs). Civil society, industry and the scientific community are registering new, and conflicting, political demands on the governance policy community of the EU. At the same time, the traditional reliance of that community on technocratic networks as the mainstay of …

  • The governance of human genetics

    Open Access•Mavis Jones, B Salter•ARTICLE•New Genetics and Society•2003

    The collection of practices now commonly understood as 'biotechnology' poses a challenge to traditional mechanisms of regulating science and technology, just as it challenges traditional practices of science. The task of regulation is to reconcile the often conflicting political demands of protecting science, economy and the public interest. Public trust is the key measure of political success or failure. The purpose of this paper is to use polic…

  • Biobanks and bioethics

    B Salter, Mavis Jones•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2005•Cited by: 26•References: 30

    Taking Biobank UK as its centrepiece, this paper analyses the politics of legitimation accompanying the emergence of population-based genetic databases and the contribution of bioethics to the power play therein. First, it explores the nature of the legitimation problem experienced by biotechnology and considers the extent to which bioethics can be regarded as an epistemic community capable of responding to that problem through a regulatory contr…

  • Change in the policy community of human genetics

    B Salter, Mavis Jones•ARTICLE•Policy & Politics•2006•Cited by: 7•References: 3

    English The 1999 Review of biotechnology regulation required the policy community of human genetics to introduce a new and open approach to governance. In implementing this policy of self-reform, the policy community is obliged to reconcile conflicting political demands from the policy networks of civil society, science and industry as it seeks to establish and maintain the legitimacy of the new regulatory apparatus. Drawing on documentary and in…

  • Climate change, human genetics, and post-normality in the UK

    Open Access•Irene Lorenzoni, Mavis Jones et al.•ARTICLE•Futures•2007•Cited by: 29•References: 28

  • Noisy and definitely not normal

    Open Access•John Turnpenny, Irene Lorenzoni et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2009•Cited by: 16•References: 23

  • Proceeding carefully

    Open Access•Mavis Jones, B Salter•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2010

    The Canadian Act Respecting Assisted Human Reproduction and Related Research (AHR Act), which came into effect in 2004, was the culmination of fifteen years of policy development in this often controversial field. Drawing from a series of semi-structured elite interviews and extensive documentary research, we examine the path to policy for the AHR Act. We identified several influences on the Act’s development, including: 1) feminist-informed acti…

  • Locating Scientific Citizenship

    Open Access•Karen Bickerstaff, Irene Lorenzoni et al.•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•2010•Cited by: 10•References: 33

    In this article, we explore the institutional negotiation of public engagement in matters of science and technology. We take the example of the Science in Society dialogue program initiated by the UK's Royal Society, but set this case within the wider experience of the public engagement activities of a range of charities, corporations, governmental departments, and scientific institutions. The novelty of the analysis lies in the linking of an acc…

  • Where Now for Post-Normal Science

    Open Access•John Turnpenny, Mavis Jones et al.•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•2011

    ‘‘Post-normal science’’ (PNS) has received much attention in recent years, but like many iconic concepts, it has attracted differing conceptualizations, applications, and implications, ranging from being a ‘‘cure-all’’ for democratic deficit to the key to achieving more sustainable futures. This editorial article introduces a Special Issue that takes stock of research on PNS and critically explores how such research may develop. Through reviewing…

  • Institutional policy learning and public consultation

    Open Access•Mavis Jones, Edna Einsiedel•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2011•Cited by: 5•References: 18

  • Rendre évident

    Janice Graham, Mavis Jones•ARTICLE•Sociologie et sociétés•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 50

    Dans le champ des études sociales de la science, les régimes de régulation du risque appréhendés selon une approche technocratique sont critiqués pour leur attention insuffisante au « public », point de vue épistémologique socialement situé qui pourtant est davantage en mesure d'articuler les préoccupations du monde réel aux implications (collectives) du risque. Il semble qu'on ait répondu à cette critique dans plusieurs pays en modernisant les r…

  • Exploring the post-genomic world

    Open Access•Christina Holmes, Siobhan M Carlson et al.•ARTICLE•New Genetics and Society•2016

    Richard Lewontin proposed that the ability of a scientific field to create a narrative for public understanding garners it social relevance. This article applies Lewontin's conceptual framework of the functions of science (manipulatory and explanatory) to compare and explain the current differences in perceived societal relevance of genetics/genomics and proteomics. We provide three examples to illustrate the social relevance and strong cultural …

Political science (11 works) · Sociology (10 works) · Law (9 works) · Politics (8 works) · Law (6 works) · Public Administration (6 works) · Economics (5 works) · Biology (4 works) · Climate Change Communication and Perception (4 works) · Public Administration (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae